The problem stems from no verifiable sources as well next to no explanatory info. Specifically the data in the profile fields (particularly birth) do not agree with the lone unsourced statement in the biography at "abt 1744" which represents a generation after the field date, implied "certain", 25 Jan 1723. This profile cold easily represent father-son, uncle or nephew.
The two apparent sources shown are recently published in 1990 and 2009 what appears to be "Family Genealogies" which are typically unsourced or at best limited sourced. The 1990 is written in German. Both sources were published in Germany where its unreasonable to think the author had sufficient knowledge about early Maryland or Pennsylvania.
As far as Maryland and Pennsylvania is concerned in this period, Maryland initially extended well into Pennsylvania almost to York before 1763 (yet certainly to Hanover) when the Mason Dixon was surveyed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mason%E2%80%93Dixon_line#/media/File:Marycolony.png. The disputed lands originated when John Digges of St Mary's was granted 10000 acres in 1727 and had it surveyed in 1736.
One cannot solve the issue of this scantly provided profile merely on hearsay of what is told in the family genealogy publications unless there is by chance an unlikely primary source attached.
The only real solution is to detach with wiki links between both profile with a discussion in the "notes". However with as limited info that exist, this can easily be done in sturm-992 maintaining the two so-called sources and ONLY info.
