Text 2
All these aporias[?] [German singular: aporie] and conflicting theories
are but reflections, a kind of super-
structure of the real[ity] apory [aporia?] in
which a) the will finds itself the mo-
ment it starts willing b) the clash
the will gets into with thinking as
an existential attitude. Notably{?}
the will itself produces its antagonist
in the counter will, but the thinking
Text 3
before it existed. Hence: Wood is a potential
table—of course with the other causes. G---{?}
true for natural things. The table has as its
origin not a cause but a causatory, keine (German: no)
kneche (German: xxx), sandun{?} einem (of a) Urheben ?(German origin), jenan[?]
Bergsma’s Symphonie nicht es miplichheit(?) (German: empathy?)
verlag bevor ihre(r) Kamposition. [Bergsma’s symphony was not published before its performance.] Der Ur-
ber ist der Mensch, der beginnen kann,
weil er selbst einen Aufang in{?} ein Ende hat.
[The author is the person who can begin because he himself has a beginning into an end.]{or something along those lines}
Kant, Metephzen{?}
Text 4
[Note: This has Latin in it.]
Will: definitions:
1) Organ of Future: Future among the ‘sq’ 3 per. Ag. Fatum. Aporaipssis xxxx suffi m.
2) Volo ut sit =aman . To confirm (and) to negate. Hate: volo ut non sit = annihilate)
3) To do something which I could also not have done. Contingency.
4) I-will-and-I-cannot – Teulus?, beg?-
5) libu arbitrium: Farndly? of choice
6) Autonoms
7) Spontaneity -
Text 6
Prefade – K---land
(first line crossed out)
Each time one is asked to write a new
introduction to an old book the generator???
a writes??; Would, could become, with the
book today on it rewritten then ? And
if no - - is it worth anything
Tis ??? instance??; the first intro-
duction: the old metaphors won’t?? work.
(So what?) But even if it looks as though the framefhedoen?,
that I still believed in old metaphors
- - The moon (&?) xxx - - wlabfollows
seems more or less all right.
The question ritually sharbingers?? :
What is action? And how is it
distinguished from ssss?-
titstes?? ?
Well, that's what I get out of it. Hopefully, others can improve upon it.
