I started reading the newspaper accounts from the time Amy's body was discovered through the trial. I don't think it's a clear cut case of a romantic tryst ending in tragedy. Unless the possible conviction of an innocent man were the tragedy.
Witness testimony for the prosecution is sketchy and Arthur appears to have had a solid alibi. And as an added twist, Arthur's brother-in-law, Homer Kneeland, 55, committed suicide August 19, 1920, by shooting himself in the head with a .38.
The medical examiner's determination of the manner of death is weak, granted it was 1920 and forensic examination was not as sophisticated at it is 100 years later.
And there was a problem with the timing of the trial. The trial was held during the Christmas holidays which may have influenced the jury to hasten their decision not taking all of the evidence into account.
Anyway, I'm going to keep reading the various accounts leading up to the trial, testimony, and inconsistancies. But the rule of law is the presumption of innocence and so far, the prosecution's case looks pretty weak. I'm just basing my opinion on my experience and I'm so far, I'm not seeing probable cause for the arrest of Arthur Mudgett.