All of my responses are starting to go into the wrong things...So I'm going to sum it it here...I've seen pretty much everything there is to see on Lovina (nee Taylor, Flanders) Bates (including the following spellings of her first name 1) Lovina, 2) Lavina, 3) Lavinia, 4) Linnie, 5) Sovina, and 6) Louisa), I am aware that Lovina Taylor married "a" Philetus Bates on 02 Jan 1865, I am also aware that "a" Philetus Bates married Sarah M Isabell on 17 Oct 1849...
And I know everyone is doing their best to help me, which I very much appreciate. But what I need help with is listed in Philetus's profile...and I'm getting the impression that putting his profile in the original posting of my question was pointless. I assumed that we are suppose to include that so people could actually look at what we have or see what it is that we are looking for. Did I misunderstand the point of including that information?
I do realize that other than the 1850 and 1870 US Census and the two marriage records is all I have in the profile...but as I've said elsewhere in this thread...I know that Lovina was married to Lyman Flanders prior to marrying Philetus (it's obvious on the 1870 US Census from the last names of the children that are not George E (not correct middle initial) Bates. I found ALL of the children, birth, death, marriage...I'm looking for date of death for Lyman Flanders so I know who the biological father of my Great Grandfather George Franklin Bates is. I have his marriage record that states that Lovina is his mother...so there is no question there, and while that his father is listed as "Lee Bates" there is the matter that he was born 18 days after Philetus married Lovina. I kinda feel like I need to just copy and paste all of what I have in Philetus's profile...because I'm just repeating myself.
I mean no disrespect to anyone, I promise...just trying to help you help me. I pray I'm coming across that way.