I don't quite get the point. Is having a higher CC7 the Key Performance Indicator of Wikitree?
I've got my tree connected pretty far back, but left a whole bunch of 20th century relatives out, to respect their privacy. The easiest way to increase my CC7 would be to add them .. which I am still rather careful about.
I've also put energy into linking slave registers to profiles, and listing the slaves .. even though there is not enough to turn them into full profiles. Those don't count for my CC7. And I don't care.
I've also started creating profiles of 'notable' people from early times, if they are missing on wikitree. But as those are unconnected to your own tree, they don't 'count'. No problem.
I'm currently very interested in a historical Slave Revolt at the Houd-Den-Beck farm, in 1825 (and an Andre Brink Book). I created a category, and a space page, and am now finding all people connected in some way to that event. The slave registers help with this, sometimes, as I found nearly all the slave rebels. I'm now going through farm survey diagrams, which help figure out which people were living on farms near to Houd-Den-Beck, in 1825. None of this helps my CC7, as I'm spending time on people that were mostly not my ancestors. But should I care?
A nice competititive spirit and gamification around getting a counter to increase: it can be fun. But gamification can help turn any KPI into a drug. Always look out when Key Performance Indicators become too important, or even dominant. Never forget to think, and choose your own set of things to pursue.
Let's realise, that all those social media are all about manipulating people and companies with key performance indicators, usually the wrong ones. I'm happy that Wikitree is not like that.
Sorry, had to say it. Everybody is allowed some fun and games. But take care :-)
