no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Unknown) Simmons (abt. 1614 - bef. 1689)

Sarah Simmons formerly [surname unknown] aka Simonson, Chandler
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1635 in Plymouth Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 75 in Duxbury, Plymouth, Plymouth Colonymap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 30 Jan 2013
This page has been accessed 2,399 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Sarah (Unknown) Simmons migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Biography

As documented in the Winter 2022 Mayflower Descendant, Sarah, wife of Moses Simmons, was possiby a daughter of Edmund Chandler by his first wife.[1] Wing includes a variety of evidence which supports this conclusion including:

  1. Plymouth Colony during the 1620s-1630s was quite small. Sarah Chandler, daughter of Edmund was the only otherwise unmarried female with a given name of Sarah documented as being in the colony during this early period.
  2. Edmund Chandler left a will, leaving some sugar he owned in Barbadoes to his daughters Sarah, Anna and Mary. Prior genealogists all stated these three daughters were by Edmund's second wife, but there is no reason why they could not be daughters by his first wife. Edmund's wording in his will leads us to believe Sarah was the eldest of his daughters. Edmund also gave a separate bequest to his daughter Ruth, which may indicate she was a daughter of a second wife.
  3. A Plymouth Court case in December 1663 dealt with dividing common land between Samuel Chandler (eldest son of Edmund) and Moses Simmons. This occurred shortly after the death of Edmund Chandler and the land likely was part of his estate, given to his heirs.
  4. The estate of the above Samuel Chandler was administered by his widow and John Soule. John Soule married Rebecca Simmons, so he was a son in-law to Moses Simmons. John would only be related to Samuel Chandler if the wife of Moses Simmons was daughter of Edmund Chandler.

We know that a woman named Sarah was married to Moses Simonson. Her maiden name is currently set as "Unknown". If she was the mother of Moses' children, they married by 1635, based on the estimated birth of their first child. They were clearly married by 13 December 1660, when Moses executed a deed that referred to the "consent of my wife Sarah."[2]

Torrey in "New England Marriages to 1700" says they were married about 1630; this aligns with the Duxbury land deeds found for Moses which appear to show him receiving a single man's portion of land and cattle in 1627 (see profile of Moses for sources).

Moses and Sarah had seven children:

  1. Rebecca, born c. 1635, married John Soule[2]
  2. Moses, born c. 1639, married Patience Barstow[2]
  3. Mary, born c. 1641, married Joseph Alden[2]
  4. John, born c. 1644, married Mercy Pabodie[2]
  5. Sarah, born c. 1649, married James Nash[2]
  6. Elizabeth, born c. 1651, married Richard Dwelley[2]
  7. Aaron, born c. 1653, married Mary Woodworth[2]

Sarah was still living in June 1673, when Richard Sutton of Roxbury sued "Moses Symonds", his wife Sarah and daughter Elizabeth. Sutton claimed that Elizabeth had promised to marry him but her parents prevented it. The court ordered "Symonds" to pay Sutton £3.[3] Sarah's last documented appearance was 4 December 1678 when Moses and Sarah gave land to their son Aaron.[4]

Sarah appears to have died before 17 June 1689, when Moses Simonson made his will, which [apparently] does not mention her.[2]

Research Notes

LNAB/Conflation Warning

Merge with caution:

There is no contemporary record that confirms a marriage of Moses and a Sarah Chandler. However, in 2022, Raymond Wing published a new theory about Moses' wife being Sarah, daughter of the immigrant Edmund Chandler in the Winter 2022 edition of the Mayflower Descendant (see info above).

It should also be noted that some sources identify Moses' wife as Sarah Chandler, the daughter of Roger Chandler. This connection is incorrect: Roger Chandler's daughter Sarah was married to Solomon Leonard and having children at the same time Moses Simmons was married to his wife Sarah and having children.

Sources

  1. Wing, Raymond T. "Sarah, wife of Moses Simmons of Duxbury: A Possible Parentage" in the Mayflower Descendant, 2022, vol. 70, pp. 42-46. AmericanAncestors.org($).
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633. Boston: NEHGS, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 1681-1683. AmericanAncestors.org($): profile of Moses Simonson.
  3. Shurtleff, PCR, vol. 5, p. 115. Archive.org.
  4. Simmons, Lorenzo Albert. History of the Simmons Family from Moses Simmons 1st (Moyses Symonson), Ship Fortune 1621. Lincoln, NE: Lincoln Herald Print, 1931, pp. 5-12. Archive.org: at p. 8, citing "Old Colony Deeds", vol. 4, p. 274.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Sarah's DNA have taken a DNA test. Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 18

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
FYI, I contacted Raymond Wing, the author of the 2022 Mayflower Descendant article cited above and asked (1) his opinion about merging this profile with Chandler-3494 and (2) if there was any new DNA information to add. His reply:
My own PERSONAL opinion is that Sarah, wife of Moses Simmons WAS the daughter of Edmund Chandler. However, the individuals who peer reviewed my article (including Robert Charles Anderson, FASG) were of the PROFESSIONAL opinion this is only a POSSIBILITY.
I don't have any updates at the present time, but am looking for matrilineal descendants of Sarah to take a mtDNA test.
Another SPECULATION is that Anna, daughter of Edmund Chandler MAY have been Hannah, wife of Joseph Rogers. The same logic used in the article for Sarah documents where there are very few Anna/Hannah's in Plymouth Colony at the time of the marriage and all other KNOWN Hannah/Anna's are already accounted for. The Pilgrim Thomas Rogers Society is actively looking for a mtDNA descendant of Anna to mtDNA test.
IF we are able to get mtDNA testing done on both of these lines and they match, it wouldn't prove the relationshop 110%, but I do believe it may be proof enough for even the GSMD to accept (as the odds of two females in Plymouth Colony during that time period to share mtDNA but not be closely related is VERY slim).
In the end, it would be up to you to decide if you feel the two profiles should be merged.
Ray

NOTE: This profile and Chandler-3494 are currently set as unmerged matches

posted by Traci Thiessen
edited by Traci Thiessen
I think it's best to maintain the status quo with the two separate profiles unless/until some proof is found or at least the GSMD decides to recognize them as being the same person.

I think it may be best to show the two profiles as a rejected match for now.

Opinions of others welcome.

posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Thanks Bobbie. I know unmerged matches are supposed to be temporary but, in this case, wouldn't it be appropriate to keep them connected as matches? I agree the profiles aren't quite ready to be merged, but the likelihood is that they will be merged eventually (hopefully soon ... do any matrilineal descendants of Sarah want to take a mtDNA test and help by submitting their results?).
posted by Traci Thiessen
Research notes should be sufficient to keep the two profiles separate but linked. If we are waiting on DNA or further evidence, that wait could be very lengthy. As an alternative, instead of a rejected match, the merge can be removed altogether.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Hi PGM. This profile would benefit from adding PPP as this Sarah has been conflated with 2 different women named Sarah Chander. Thx!
posted by Traci Thiessen
Done, thanks for the heads up and the Research notes.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Stump-19 and Unknown-190100 do not represent the same person because: Completely different time period
posted by Gavin Kennedy K
Stump-19 and Unknown-190100 do not represent the same person because: I removed this match previously. I see no reason why anyone would be confused between these two people.
posted by Ellen Smith
I authored an article in the Winter 2022 "Mayflower Descendant" showing where Sarah was possibly daughter of Edmund Chandler (Chandler-194). The article was peer-reviewed by Christopher Child (current "Mayflower Descendant" editor) and Robert Charles Anderson of NEHGS (and well known for his "Great Migration" series). While the evidence is not 100% "bullet proof", I am personally convinced of this relationship (based on the evidence provided in the article). However, I understand why the reviewers asked me have the article only state where Sarah was possibly a daughter of Edmund Chandler.

In his will, Edmund Chandler left to his daughters Sarah, Anna and Mary , and a separate bequest to daughter Ruth. Most researchers assumed they were all by his second wife (and presumably unmarried), but there is no reason to believe they were unmarried or they were by his second marriage. There is other evidence (documented in the article) linking Sarah Simmons to a number of relatives of Edmund Chandler.

posted by Raymond Wing
Could you please cite your article as a source (including author, title, date, and page numbers) in the biography section of the profile and describe the evidence that supports your notion that she was the daughter of Edmund Chandler?
posted by Ellen Smith
Thanks for that suggestion, Robin.

It's not certain that Sarah was Moses' only wife, but since the only identified wife of Moses was Sarah, and he had a wife in New England by 1635, it's reasonable to treat her as PGM. I've added the project box and project account; the PGM project leaders may want to consider how they want to deal with her.

I am going to disconnect the connected father, since there's no reason for her to be connected to any father.

posted by Ellen Smith
Shouldn't she also be PGM?
posted by Robin Anderson
I adopted this orphan profile to help get it merged to Unknown-190100.
posted by Ellen Smith
This woman Unknown-190100 was not a Chandler. Any objection to disconnecting this profile from "Anonymous Chandler" as her father?
posted by Ellen Smith
Chandler-2148 and Unknown-190100 appear to represent the same person because: The Chandler-2148 profile represents the Sarah Chandler who is supposed to have married Moses Simmons. As documented on his profile, the maiden name of his wife Sarah is unknown, and she was not the Sarah Chandler who was born in 1622. Please merge. The merge destination should be the Unknown profile.
posted by Ellen Smith
Is there any proof that Moses Simmons (Jr. or II) married Sarah Chandler? for example a record dating from the 1600's?

Featured Eurovision connections: Sarah is 28 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 20 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 24 degrees from Corry Brokken, 18 degrees from Céline Dion, 22 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 24 degrees from France Gall, 25 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 24 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 18 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 31 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 29 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 15 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

[Do you know Sarah's family name?]  |  S  >  Simmons  >  Sarah (Unknown) Simmons

Categories: Estimated Birth Date | Puritan Great Migration