no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elizabeth Ruth (McQueen) Brown (bef. 1727 - aft. 1806)

Elizabeth Ruth Brown formerly McQueen
Born before in Baltimore, Maryland, British Colonial Americamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Wife of — married before 1747 in Baltimore, Maryland, British Colonial Americamap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 79 in Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Dennis Gordon private message [send private message] and Millie Kreis private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 31 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 1,818 times.

Contents

Biography

Elizabeth Ruth McQueen b. ca 1727-1730? in Anne Arundel county?, Md, d. bef 1806 in Baltimore county, Md, married before 1747 in Baltimore county to John R. Brown, Sr.[1].
Note: The first name of "Ruth" for McQueen, wife of John Brown, is not certain[2], however, other sources such as Find A Grave list her first name as Elizabeth Ruth.[3]
Edward Logsdon II, b. 15 Aug 1752, Frederick Co., Maryland, was married in 1769 in Baltimore, Maryland, to Polly, b. 12 November 1760? (no doubt incorrect year), Baltimore, Maryland, daughter of John Brown and ___ McQueen (dau. of Dugal and Grace McQueen), son of George and Mary (Stevenson) Brown"...[2]

Notes regarding Wills and Testaments during the 1700s

One reason Dugal McQueen daughter(s) are not mentioned in the Will could be for certain reasons as follows: When one child seems to be missing from the list, you should not attach too much importance to this. It does not mean he or she was disinherited. The family farm may have been passed on to the older son when the father retired. Since he already had his inheritance it wasn't necessary to name him in the will. Another son may have been given money to start his own business or to move west. Daughters were often given their share at the time of their marriage, so married daughters might not be named.[4]

Elizabeth was born after 1725. She passed away after 1810.

Baltimore County Maryland, USADeath: 1810 Baltimore County Maryland, USA Wife of John Brown, daughter of Dugal McQueen and Grace Brown McLean McQueen. Grace Brown McLean was born in Scotland in 1694 and died March 26, 1746 She married Dugal McQueen about 1720. 

Records say that Elizabeth Ruth McQueen was born "abt 1725".

Children of John Brown and Elizabeth Ruth McQueen: Henry b. about 1752, Ruth b. 1752, Anne Nancy b. abt 1760, Edward b. abt 1760, Mary b. abt 1760, Nicholas b. abt 1762, George b. abt 1765 and Richard b. abt 1767.    Family links:   Spouse:   John Brown (1725 - 1810)    Children:   Ruth Brown Algire (1745 - 1840)*   Anne Nancy Brown Richards (1763 - 1834)*  

  • Calculated relationship

 Burial: Unknown  Created by: HBB Record added: Jul 21, 2014  Find A Grave Memorial# 133136512

Baltimore County Maryland, USADeath: 1810 Baltimore County Maryland, USA Wife of John Brown, daughter of Dugal McQueen and Grace Brown McLean McQueen. Grace Brown McLean was born in Scotland in 1694 and died March 26, 1746 She married Dugal McQueen about 1720. 

Records say that Elizabeth Ruth McQueen was born "abt 1725".

Children of John Brown and Elizabeth Ruth McQueen: Henry b. about 1752, Ruth b. 1752, Anne Nancy b. abt 1760, Edward b. abt 1760, Mary b. abt 1760, Nicholas b. abt 1762, George b. abt 1765 and Richard b. abt 1767.    Family links:   Spouse:   John Brown (1725 - 1810)    Children:   Ruth Brown Algire (1745 - 1840)*   Anne Nancy Brown Richards (1763 - 1834)*  

  • Calculated relationship

 Burial: Unknown  Created by: HBB Record added: Jul 21, 2014  Find A Grave Memorial# 133136512


Sources

  1. Boles, D.B. (2016). Boles-Barth Omnibus Ancestry. Tuscaloosa, AL, pages 39, 40, 197: private print at Lulu
  2. 2.0 2.1 The Durbin and Logsdon Genealogy with Related Families, 1626-1998, 2nd Revised Edition.
  3. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=133136512
  4. Wills and TestamentsI Do Hereby Bequeath...by Donna Przecha


  • "Family Tree," database, FamilySearch (http://familysearch.org : modified 31 December 2023, 17:57), entry for Elizabeth Ruth McQueen (PID https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:KLV9-859 ); contributed by various users.
  • Carson, Betty Jewell Durbin, The Durbin and Logsdon Genealogy with Related Families, 1626-1998, 2nd Revised Edition, Heritage Books, Inc., page 884.
Source: #S-899753593
Page: Ancestry Family Trees
Note:
Data:
Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=7221440&pid=774460092
Source S-899753593
Repository: #R-899753595
Title: Ancestry Family Trees
Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.
Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created.

Acknowledgments

  • This person was created through the import of Beaman Family Tree.ged on 31 March 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom.
  • "Family Tree," database, FamilySearch (http://familysearch.org : modified 15 March 2023, 21:24), entry for Elizabeth Ruth McQueen (PID https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:KLV9-859 ); contributed by various users.
  • England Births and Christenings 1538-1975




Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Please, it's time to merge these two profiles.
posted by Jane Peppler
McQueen-3493 and McQueen-102 appear to represent the same person because: Appear to be same person
posted by Millie Kreis
Do we have any sources that support an additional marriage, besides the one to John Brown? Why is Edward Brown listed as another husband?
posted by R Prior
Just a reminder to chase up the above as to wondering why Edward is showing as a husband. If there are no reliable source then he should be taken off.
posted by Cliff Truesdale

M  >  McQueen  |  B  >  Brown  >  Elizabeth Ruth (McQueen) Brown