Yes. Me n 1958. A biological half-uncles son. My biological mothers son…to name a few.
So I have two trees to work on. Many years before knew I would learn my biological story, I had researched my adopted mothers line of Trescotts. This line extends through immigrant William Trescott to his father-in-law George Dyer of Dorchester, MA in the 1630s. I did quite a bit of research on George Dyer, but never learned what happened to him in his later years.
Then spring forward about 10 years, and I have discovered my biological parents, and I’ve got a good start on that tree. In that tree I learned that I likely descend from David Phippen of Boston. In examining Phippen’s will, I find a mention of a George “Diet” [I believe “Dier”], an occupant of one of his houses in Boston in 1650. This makes sense to be my George Dyer because David Phippen is related to Thomas Purchase, George Dyer’s partner, and another adopted tree ancestor that I researched extensively.
Could it be that Sarah Purchase and Gamaliel Phippen (my biological ancestors) were looking after or renting to an older George Dyer in 1650? All that previous research came in handy or I would never of made that connection.
I have to wonder….we’re my biological Phippens helping my adopted Dyer/Trescotts in advance of the Trescotts helping me, years in the future…my adoption just paying off a bit of an ancient debt?
(Furthermore, if you try to extend the Phippen line and the Trescott line back to the Middle Ages you find a rivalry between the de Wrottesleys (Phippen) and the de Pertons (Trescott), wherein Sir Hugh de Wrottesley murdered poor John de Perton. Too much to prove on this one…but makes me wonder that perhaps this was the actual ancient debt being paid for….since Sir Hugh got away with it!