What fields are given priority in testing for duplicates, e.g. spellings of names, upper/lower case, LNAB or FNAB, etc.?

+6 votes
82 views
Which takes precedence for 'names' e.g. church-v-civil, registers-v-transcriptions, birth/baptism/marriage/death/burial events; other?
in The Tree House by Phil Grace G2G6 Mach 1 (17.6k points)

1 Answer

+8 votes
 
Best answer
I don't think the algorithm differentiates between one type of source versus another (civil v church).  Some duplicates don't even have sources!  It goes via name and sounds-like (and sometimes I wonder if what sounds-like to it is actually what sounds-like to a human!).  It also goes by date plus or minus 2 years, so if what you have put is 10 years out, it won't pick up any possible duplicates.
by Ros Haywood G2G Astronaut (2.0m points)
selected by Phil Grace
Thank you Ros.

I'd just prepared a lengthy comment in response and thought I'd add the star before adding the comment. Silly me, as the prepared comment left the room - and I don't feel like, at this time, starting over.

I'll be back..Phil (Grace-883).

OK. Sorry about the interruption – back to my major uncertainty.

My initial question was in anticipation of creating a new profile for the spouse - of an individual whose profile I’d already created.

I was aware of a similar (and basically the same person’s) detail in an existing profile but both the LNAB & FNAB were different, as to spelling, e.g. existing (but as yet without a spouse) “Catherine MacDonald” – v – proposed “Katherine Macdonald” (to be linked to a pre-existing spouse’s and children’s profiles).

To avoid creating a duplicate & then having to merge both, I first posted a comment to the Profile Manager for ‘Catherine’. She kindly changed the FNAB to 'Katherine' (but not the LNAB) and orphaned the profile (which I then adopted) - after linking it to the spouse & children’s profiles which I’d previously created. So, all good – almost.

The LNAB (MacDonald) for the now corrected FNAB 'Katherine', still does not match the LNAB (Macdonald) as shown in the source reference for Katherine’s birth registration.

Worse still that same source (QLD bdm) also shows LNAB (Macdonald) for Katherine’s father – whereas his LNAB for his birth registration (in the same QLD bdm records) is shown as McDonald – as is his father!

What to do?

Does any of this matter anyway? (IMHO it does)

If so, a similar situation will apply to existing profiles for Katherine’s siblings & their children, etc. as well as for Katherine’s father and his siblings, parents, etc., etc.

Where does it end? Who will make the edits, etc.?

Someone, please help!

Related questions

+4 votes
3 answers
+2 votes
1 answer
177 views asked Mar 30, 2022 in Genealogy Help by Cindi Bonney G2G6 Mach 2 (20.8k points)
+5 votes
1 answer
0 votes
2 answers
+7 votes
1 answer
+6 votes
2 answers
191 views asked Sep 17, 2014 in WikiTree Tech by Bob Jewett G2G Astronaut (1.2m points)
+5 votes
3 answers
+7 votes
2 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...