Foulques (b. ante 1100 - d. [uncertain] young?). White, writing in Complete Peerage, proposed that if he didn't die young, then he became a monk at Abingdon Abbey.[1][2][3] He wrote:
"FULK the KING'S SON, and Richard the tutor, witnessed a gift to Abingdon Abbey by William, s. of Anskill and Ansfride, the mother of Henry I’s s. Richard, all abovenamed;[Footnote "e": Itinerarium Kambriae, pp. 130-31 ; Annales Camlzriae, ut supra (under 1158); Brut y Tywysogion (Rolls Ser.), p. 189 [under 1156; indexed as son of Henry II, who was only 23 years old in I156].)] the gift being made in consideration of his mother having been bur. in the abbey. The obvious inference is that Fulk was a yr. s. of Henry and Ansfride, and was being brought up at the abbey in charge of his tutor. In any event he must have been a son of Henry I. Fulk probably became a monk at Abingdon or d. young."
As explained on the Henry II project webpage, Kathleen Thompson's more recent publication questions these conclusions.
"White [110] would make him a son of Ansfrid, based on the fact that he appears in the same document as her and her son Richard (d. 1120, above). Thompson considers it unlikely that he was Ansfrid's son, since the source does not explicitly say that Fulk was her son."[4]
↑ Geoffrey H. White, "Henry I's Illegitimate children", CP 11, Appendix D (pp. 105-121).
↑ 2.02.12.22.3 Cawley, 2006, MedLands Database. at Foundation for Medieval Genealogy website, (accessed 2021). Entry for Foulques son of Henry I.
↑ Weis. Britain's Royal Families. (2011): page 49.
↑Henry II project, referring to, Kathleen Thompson, "Affairs of State: the illegitimate children of Henry I", Journal of Medieval History 29 (2003): 129-151.
See also:
Weis, Alison. Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy, (2011): page 49. Google Books.
Is Fulk your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
This person is listed as an illegitimate son of Henry I by his mistress Ansfride in Richardson's Royal Ancestry (2013) at Vol 1, p 12. Richardson didn't qualify his attribution of this parentage with "alleged" or "possible" or any other term.
Thanks David, but Thompson's article states that Fulk is referred to only as the King's son, which is different to Richard in the same document, who is definitely referred to as son of Henry I and Ansfride.
I also find Richardson's books difficult as they don't actually cite sources, just have a list of sources which means it's difficult to tell whether he has seen Thompson's article and rejected her assessment or not seen it a all.
The biography does need a bit of updating, but I think I'll leave Ansfride as uncertain.
Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections:
Fulk is
33 degrees from 今上 天皇, 26 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 26 degrees from Dwight Heine, 34 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 29 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 28 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 27 degrees from Sono Osato, 41 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 28 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 30 degrees from Taika Waititi, 27 degrees from Penny Wong and 25 degrees from Chang Bunker
on our single family tree.
Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
I also find Richardson's books difficult as they don't actually cite sources, just have a list of sources which means it's difficult to tell whether he has seen Thompson's article and rejected her assessment or not seen it a all.
The biography does need a bit of updating, but I think I'll leave Ansfride as uncertain.