Who Owns FamilyTreeDNA? (Explained)

+12 votes
507 views

Found this well researched article: Who Owns FamilyTreeDNA? (Explained)

The author actually did similar analysis about Ancestry, 23andMe, MyHeritage, LivingDNA and GEDmatch.

Well worth the reading for everyone interested in genetic genealogy.

in The Tree House by Andreas West G2G6 Mach 7 (76.4k points)
retagged by Ellen Smith

Her LivingDNA article unravels also some very interesting background info, explaining why the author doesn't want to do business with them:

Who Owns Living DNA? (Explained)

For the record:  The blog is Data Mining DNA, and the author is Margaret O'Brien.

I'll add a link to another blog post from three days ago, this one from Leah Larkin, The DNA Geek: "The Future of FTDNA". She includes the questions from a survey sent out to FTDNA customers this week. The first five questions are demographic (age, sex, etc.), but the remaining ones, I'm afraid, pretty much tell the tale.

What's interesting is that the survey was first brought to my attention in a groups.io ISOGG discussion. One well-known individual wrote, "I got at least 3 copies. One to every email that I have ever used as an Admin or customer."

Funny thing. I've been a customer since 2002; admin or co-admin five FTDNA surname projects; have purchased (almost) every test they've ever offered; and from purchasing tests for others I have eight different email addresses on file with them and, of course, receive all group admin notifications.

What I find strange is that I never received email one from FTDNA about this survey. Hm. I wonder if they have a "curmudgeons, do-not-send" list; you know, so that they avoid riling up contrarian people who buy ink by the gallon. Looks like they should have put Leah and Margaret on that list, too.
wink

I have several FTDNA accounts, and I didn't get the survey either.

Wait... Let me check the curmudgeons list...

Nope. You're not on it. smiley

The survey must have been sent to some subset of the customer base, but I wonder how it was segmented? The brief quotation I used is from someone, like me, who has been a customer almost since day one and has bought virtually everything. So the target list can't have been selected based on length of relationship or "upsellability." Maybe it was simply a random extraction so that myDNA can start its market research.

I'm going to be really concerned for FTDNA if they load all their eggs into the "DNA for diet, vitamin supplements, and skin care" basket. I'd have thought that, by now, we'd be beyond the naiveté that our microarray tests can accurately tell you which brand of vitamin D3 to take or what kind of wine will taste best to you. Sigh.

I bought 10+ DNA tests with them as well (still have 2 lying around waiting for relatives to agree to testing) but I didn't get that survey either.

Probably on their sh$tl$st too.

Somehow I didn't make it on the curmudgeons list and received the offer to take the survey.  All questions were related to a potential "health" offering, at least in some distant fashion, to which I uniformly answered "Not at all interested."  No questions related to genetic genealogy.  I don't have much use for FTDNA anymore, at least for auDNA, as the pool of matches is very small.  Text of email:

Hello,

As part of our ongoing effort to provide you, our customer, with valuable products and services that are of interest to you, we would like to request your feedback via a short online survey. It should only take about 3 minutes of your time.

FamilyTreeDNA's focus will always be genealogy, and we will continue our efforts to bring you new and innovative features that support you in your journey of discovery. As a result of our recent merger with myDNA, we are also looking forward to expanding our product offerings to include myDNA's health and wellness services and would like to gauge your interest.  

 

Take Survey

 

Thank you very much for your time and effort!

Sincerely,

FamilyTreeDNA

1 Answer

+17 votes
 
Best answer

Thanks for posting this, Andreas. The blog is concise (something I respect but have difficulty achieving myself), but when talking about Family Tree DNA's company history I feel there's someone who was left out and deserving of mention.

Thomas Krahn and his wife, Astrid, owned DNA-Fingerprint in Germany before the company was acquired by Family Tree DNA (Gene by Gene) in 2006. The Krahns relocated to Houston, Texas, and were responsible for helping plan, design, and operationalize Gene by Gene's Genomics Research Center where the company would do all subsequent testing and sequencing. I've visited that center several times, and my biggest concern about the acquisition is potentially losing genetic genealogy as a priority for the lab. The Big Y test has been an absolute game changer and I sincerely hope it continues to be a focus for support and development.

The Krahns moved back home to Germany around the 2012 timeframe and founded YSEQ in 2013. YSEQ is one of the only labs in the world besides FTDNA where significant consumer yDNA testing is performed. Many DNA project administrators look to YSEQ for singleton SNP testing since their catalog of available one-off SNPs is larger than FTDNA's and they're generally less expensive for the purpose. YSEQ also provide NGS whole genome sequencing.

The Krahns have been researchers and influencers in genetic genealogy for two decades. For those familiar with SNPs on the Y chromosome, the naming convention includes one or more letters prefacing numerals. These designate the discoverer of the SNP. An "A" stands for Thomas and Astrid Krahn (for example, the SNP I-A19420), and a "Z" represents a group of several researchers that includes Thomas, Alex Williamson, Roman Sychev (one of the team at YFull), and others (for example, the SNP R-Z290).

Thomas also continues to develop and offer DNA utilities free of charge to the community. Under the auspices of ISOGG, YBrowse provides a detailed Y-only chromosome browser using Build 38, the current human genome assembly and the one FTDNA uses for the Big Y test. You can search by SNP, STR, or a range of base pair loci. If you're so inclined, from that site you can also download the current underlying data files for yDNA.

The YSEQ Clade Finder v1.0 is also free and OpenSource, and uses an application interface to the YFull haplotree to determine the deepest subclade based on either manually input SNP results, or by uploading data files from 23andMe, AncestryDNA, MyHeritage, or an NGS VCF file. Originally pioneered by Whit Athey, also offered free is a new YSEQ Haplogroup Predictor (beta version) that takes as input up to 111 Y-STR values and returns an estimated haplogroup.

The Krahns had a lot to do with the success of the Gene by Gene Genomics Research Center and the migration of testing there from the University of Arizona. So just a footnote to acknowledge them and all the work they did in relation to Family Tree DNA.

by Edison Williams G2G6 Pilot (449k points)
selected by Andreas West
Thank you, very interesting info. I tried to save it but apparently flag means something different than in email.
As you probably know by now, flagging on G2G means you object to the post and think it should be removed.

Depending on your device and your software, you might be able to save the post in several ways.

• Save the entire thread as a PDF.

* Save the link.

* Highlight the post and save it to a Word page.

Edit:  You can also click on the plus sign at the upper right of the question and that will add it to your G2G favorites.

Related questions

+16 votes
2 answers
+26 votes
8 answers
+13 votes
6 answers
+24 votes
1 answer
+17 votes
4 answers
580 views asked Dec 2, 2017 in The Tree House by Dorothy Barry G2G Astronaut (2.7m points)
+8 votes
2 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...