Edison Williams
Privacy Level: Private with Public Biography and Family Tree (Yellow)

Edison Williams

Honor Code Signatory
Signed 23 May 2017 | 9,308 contributions | 409 thank-yous | 1,694 connections
Edison E. Williams
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [private father (1890s - 1970s)] and [private mother (1920s - 1960s)]
Brother of [private brother (1920s - 1980s)] [half] and
[children unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Edison Williams private message [send private message] and H. Williams private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Mar 2017
This page has been accessed 17,904 times.

Contents

Biography

Guild of One-Name Studies
Member 7695
Edison Williams is a descendant of a Texas First Family who settled in the Republic of Texas before February 19, 1846.
Edison Williams is a Project Member of the Texas Project.
Edison Williams is a member of the Threlkeld Name Study Project.
Edison Williams is a member of the Pollard Name Study Project.
Edison Williams is a member of the Horton Name Study Project.
Edison is a member of the National Genealogical Society.
Edison is a member of the Texas State Historical Association.
Edison is a member of the Texas State Genealogical Society.
Edison is a member of the GeneaBloggers Tribe, a genealogy bloggers collective.
Edison is a contributor to the International Society of Genetic Genealogy and the ISOGG Wiki.
Edison is a member of the American Society of Human Genetics.
Edison is a member of the International Society for Computational Biology.
Edison is a member of the International Society for Biomolecular Archaeology.
Edison is a member of the advisory board of the Personal Genomics Foundation.

Interested in a great, broad range of subjects. Alas, master of none.[1][2]

Random Facts

  • Have annoyed many people at several universities[3]
  • Used to do some teaching; that's why I can tend to get all "lecturey" in G2G[4]
  • Worked at both entrepreneurial startups and Fortune 500s; one Fortune 100; one of the entrepreneurial startups grew into a Fortune 1000...all the numbers get confusing
  • The profile photo was not taken this year; the beard is heavier and I look much, much younger now
  • Published in unexpected places, like Oxford University Press...but absolutely nothing anyone would want to read
  • Speaking of, one of the few people I know who owns a hardcopy of the full Oxford English Dictionary...all 16 volumes and 42 shelf-inches of it (1st edition, 1978; a shame the 1989 2nd edition was the last that will ever see physical print; yep: word-nerd)
  • Owned a book publishing company for a decade and, perforce, got a grounding in copyright, permissions, and publication rights
  • Have a set of seal-of-office cufflinks given to me by a former Vice President of the United States
  • Manage the Guild-registered Threlkeld One-Name Study, and here on WikiTree; also the Guild-registered Pollard One-Name Study and the Horton study on WikiTree
  • Administrator for the McCollough, Pollard, Teasley, and Threlkeld Surname DNA Projects at Family Tree DNA
  • Blog at CountingChromosomes.com; the plan was for it to become a blog/podcast combo... A podlog? blogcast? Maybe just blast? But, alas, my word-count has gone to G2G, not my blog, and that notion was abandoned
  • Contributing editor to the International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG); brief bio at ISOGG
  • Member of the advisory board of the Personal Genomics Foundation, and member of the American Society of Human Genetics, the International Society for Computational Biology, and the International Society for Biomolecular Archaeology
  • Once had dinner with both James Watson and Francis Crick...well, along with a bunch of other people; I was just an undergrad and it was a college departmental thing
  • Every time I think I can finally spell "DNA," I learn something I didn't know
  • I share 98.7% of my protein-coding DNA with chimpanzees and bonobos; share 85% with mice; share 60% with fruit flies; but most impressive of all is that I share at least 41% of my coding DNA with bananas[5]
  • I am not completely human; I'm only about 43%-45% human[6]

Most Memorable Quotations

"I started out highlighting all the quotable passages in this blog post. I gave up when I noticed that most of the text was being highlighted."
       —Elizabeth Shown Mills (CG, CGL, FASG, FNGS), writing on
           11 September 2018 about my blog post,
           "Genetic Genealogy and the Dunning-Kruger Effect"
"Sources err. Sources quibble. Sources exaggerate. Sources misremember. Sources are biased. Sources have egos and ideologies.... There are no historical resources we can simply trust. There are no records whose riddles we do not have to thoughtfully decipher.... As careful researchers, we cannot apply an easy, generic label—reliable or unreliable—to any document, much less any type of document."
       —Elizabeth Shown Mills, Evidence Explained, Third Edition Revised
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
       —Eske Willerslev, GeoGenetics Centre, University of Copenhagen
"Hominem unius libri timeo; not only to the man of one book, but also to the man of one idea, in whom the sense of proportion is lacking, and who sees only that for which he looks."
       —Edward Everett
"One of the great challenges in this world is knowing enough about a subject to think you're right, but not knowing enough about a subject to know you're wrong."
       —Neil deGrasse Tyson
"The creative mind flourishes best when it is apparently wasting time. Shakespeare, we are told, was habitually idle between plays."
       —J. Robert Oppenheimer
"It cannot be said too often: all life is one."
       —Bill Bryson, A Short History of Nearly Everything
"DNA doesn't lie, but it can mislead. It's like consulting an accurate but cryptic and mischievous oracle. It often answers questions other than the one we think we asked, and it usually says a good deal less than we wish it did. A whole industry of sketchy interpreters surrounds the oracle, profiting from the confusion of the seekers."
       —Herbert Tardy
"Ed Williams is the most serious man in the world. His frown lines have frown lines. Clint Eastwood learned to squint menacingly from watching him. Ed has a black T-shirt with an arrow pointing at his face that says, 'I'm with the nihilist.' When he's in a cheerful mood, he listens to Orff's Carmina Burana. He considers Søren Kierkegaard to have been a stand-up comedian. Webster's Dictionary has his photo beside the word 'dour.'

"Oh... Wait. No. No, I'm thinking of somebody else. Never mind."

       —Anonymous

Sources

  1. First-hand information, entered by Ed Williams. Don't implicitly trust his memory, though. It used to be very good, but his tally of functional neurons and glial cells ain't what it used to be. And, at the end of the day, he is a 41% coding-DNA match to a banana.
  2. The sentence, "Alas, master of none," is not entirely accurate. Ed has been to every continent except Antarctica and used to travel quite a bit for work. Ed is/was an expert at napping on airplanes. The degree of expertise in this activity may have diminished in the past several years, however, because the amount of travel has decreased. Current areas of bona fide expertise include both sitting in recliners and the one-handed operation of Kindle eReaders.
  3. Ed's tendency to annoy is not limited to any particular time in his life. He remains efficient at it, though perhaps not a true expert. As a refresher of his outdated academic studies he took a few post-grad courses and labs in human genetics in 2018-19 at the University of Houston, where the other students at first mistook him to be a visiting professor emeritus...or perhaps just a homeless guy who had somehow managed to wander into the lecture hall. Ed was a decade or so older than the teacher. All indications are that he was quickly able to annoy even his fellow students because no one wanted to be his lab partner...some sotto voce comments about not pairing with someone who might have actually known Gregor Mendel. Which admittedly surprised Ed. Because he hadn't yet even begun throwing references to movies and TV shows of the '70s and '80s.
  4. Empirical evidence points to Ed as having, by a large margin, the highest per-post average word count on G2G. He can't write a simple grocery shopping list on fewer than two sheets of paper. Typed. Single spaced. Get him started trying to explain something about DNA and he can go on for an interminably painful amount of time. Perhaps no one else writing on G2G continuously runs up against the post limit of 12,000 characters. Perhaps few others even know that there is a 12,000 character limit.

    An examination of random posts completed between August 2021 and August 2023 showed he had an average word count of 612. Adjusted for a 15% margin of error, that would be 520 words per post. As of October 2023, Ed has written 2,887 combined G2G questions, answers, and comments, which then tallies to approximately 1.5 million words written. To put that loquaciously irritating number into perspective:
    • All seven of the Harry Potter books combined: 1,084,170 words
    • War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy: 587,287 words
    • Total in The Lord of the Rings trilogy plus The Hobbit: 576,459 words
    • Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand: 561,996 words
    • Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry: 365,712 words
    • The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky: 364,153 words

    Note: This source citation has recently come under additional scrutiny, and it has been hypothesized, though as yet unconfirmed, that Ed was the inspiration for a brief dialog exchange in the movie The French Dispatch (released 22 October 2021; directed by Wes Anderson; screenplay by Wes Anderson; story by Wes Anderson, Roman Coppola, Hugo Guinness, and Jason Schwartzman). In a scene of an editorial meeting early in the movie was this bit of dialog:
    Story Editor: "We asked for twenty-five hundred words, and she came in at fourteen thousand, plus footnotes, endnotes, a glossary, and two epilogues."
    Arthur Howitzer Jr. (played by Bill Murray): (Sighs) "It's one of her best."
    Screenplay writer and director Wes Anderson has not yet commented on whether he knows Ed Williams, or whether this brief passage in the film was directed at him in a sarcastic manner.
  5. Sano Genetics, "Are We Genetically Similar to Bananas and Why is this Important for Research in Disease?" Sano Genetics Blog, 30 Nov 2019 (https://sanogenetics.com/blog/are-we-genetically-similar-to-bananas-and-why-is-this-important-for-research-in-disease/ : accessed 30 Mar 2020). But, no: Ed does not begin to display large brown spots after a few days sitting in a fruit bowl. In the spirit of full disclosure, however, Ed has never sat in a fruit bowl for longer than an hour or so; we have no empirical, peer-reviewed evidence regarding extended-duration brown spots.
  6. Crisp, Alastair, Chiara Boschetti, Malcolm Perry, Alan Tunnacliffe, and Gos Micklem. "Expression of Multiple Horizontally Acquired Genes Is a Hallmark of Both Vertebrate and Invertebrate Genomes." Genome Biology 16, no. 1 (March 13, 2015): 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0607-3. The Crisp, et al., publication clearly refers to the microbiome and the number of bacteria and viruses extant within every human being. However, people who have known Ed for over 30 years resolutely attest that 43%-45% microbial content alone cannot account for the degree of weirdness consistently displayed, that there is something more than that going on in the not-quite-human department.

Only the Trusted List can access the following:
  • Edison's formal name
  • full middle name (E.)
  • nicknames
  • e-mail address
  • images (1)
  • private siblings' names
For access to Edison Williams's full information you must be on Edison's Trusted List. Please login.


DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships by comparing test results with Edison or other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
  • Edison Williams: Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 838 markers, haplogroup R1b1-BY35083 + Y-Chromosome Test, haplogroup R1b1-FGC95121
  • H. Williams Find Relationship : Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 37 markers, haplogroup M-269, FTDNA kit #791074
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
  • Edison Williams: Family Tree DNA mtDNA Test Full Sequence, haplogroup H4a1a1a + Mitochondrial DNA Test, haplogroup H4a1a1a
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Edison:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Comments: 66

Leave a message for others who see this profile. If you prefer to keep it private, send a message to a profile manager: private message private message
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hello, sir. There's a post at phylogeographer.com that I'll link below in which the author describes an issue with the FGC78762 SNP. I'm not extremely knowledgeable regarding how phylogeny is established and I'm wondering whether you can help me understand this issue. Is the author suggesting that an SNP could be identified between DF27 and some subclades (including R-FGC78762)?

https://phylogeographer.com/r1b-ft318890-a-sw-france-lineage-of-r1b-df27/

posted by M. Hebert
First, "sir" was my father.  :-) Second, thanks for the note; I'll try to decipher some of what Hunter is saying in his post, but I'm not certain I'll be much help.

My reply ran way too long to put here in the Comments section, so I'll send you a private message from your profile. If that doesn't reach you, you can contact me securely at https://countingchromosomes.com/about-us/contact-us and let me know the best email address for you.

posted by Edison Williams
Got it, thank you. It seemed like the post might portend a development that would lead to refinement below DF27 at YFull. That's still my interpretation, but based on your email it seems it would somehow result from merging of branches rather than from identification of a new "intermediate" SNP. Interesting email... I appreciate it, Edison!
posted by M. Hebert
Hello again Edison so sorry but I wrote to you and I made a mistake I replied to Alan all the words were meant for you extreme thank you for your huge write up re; me and my dna best wishes from Diane.
Never a problem, Diane; and thanks. Alan contributed as much as I did. It just takes me a lot more words to say anything...  ;-)
posted by Edison Williams
Hello Edison,

We now have a Google group for the Texas Project. https://groups.google.com/u/0/g/wttexas

If you are interested in joining the Texas Google group, please send me your email address by private WikiTree email.

I will then add your email address and you will be set to receive the postings.

Thanks,

Mary Richardson, Project Coordinator, Texas

posted by Mary Richardson
Thanks for adding me, Mary! I've visited the Group and set it as one of my favorites. I only hope I can contribute a little bit along the way...
posted by Edison Williams
Edison, send the email address for the Texas google group, as I am not sure I got an email for you. Mary
posted by Mary Richardson
I'm all set up and good to go, Mary. The Google Group shows me as having been admitted, along with several others, on June 9. Isn't it nice to get a reply once in a while that says you have no new work to do?  :-) Thanks again!
posted by Edison Williams
I'm so glad you were able to join the Team Roses party for the Connect A Thon. It's always a blast working beside you! Emma :-)
My question was: I need info about the y dna test; will it give info as to whether a person is my 5th ggrandfather?

I read your answer and others and It seems from all the replies that I have gotten is that the Y dna test is worthless for verifying a distant ancestor. The situation is that I have documents that take me back to a John Teague born around 1750; a book on the Teagues indicate that a Edward Teague was either his father of his uncle. Most researchers on the Teagues believe Edward is his father; but the only reference to John and Edward says that Edward was a pioneer from Virginia who came with several brothers and John probably came with Edward. Because there is nothing that definitely says John was his son, he may have been his brother. We do not know for sure what their birthdates were so they may have been close enough in age to be brothers.

posted by rj Teague
Heya, RJ! Thanks for the comment and the clarification. Since it might be useful for others to read, and because I know the word-count is gonna get hefty (partly because I glanced at a couple of the WikiTree profiles involved and I think there are problems) I hope you're okay with me going back to that G2G topic and posting an answer there.

The bottom line, though, is that you're correct. While yDNA testing can be super useful for identifying patrilineal ancestry, using it to distinguish paternity for a SPECIFIC ancestor--e.g., was it one of two brothers--isn't impossible, but can take a lot of luck and a lot of data from multiple test-takers.

posted by Edison Williams
Thanks for posting this news, Edison.

Tangent: I think these SPACs seem like a symptom of a bubble, inflation, and presage bad news to come.

posted by Chris Whitten
Thanks, Chris. Yeah' I'm with ya. Not that I'm terribly informed about the matter. On one hand, I think the market should be as free as possible; on the other, I lived through the Penny Stock Reform Act and it's difficult to argue that measures of investor protection are needed and...things constantly change and require vigilance. I've been following the whole Game Stop & Robin Hood brouhaha, and who would have thought a decade ago that something like that would actually happen.

To me, superficially, a SPAC seems a bit of a back-door, a lawyer-created way to...bend SEC 419 a bit. But I had a phone conversation Friday with an old friend and whip-smart business guy who's less negative about SPACs. His opinion is more that they're a double-edged sword. His point was that (paraphrasing) if you validly describe a SPAC as a shell company that goes public with no assets and whose only business plan is to purchase an as-yet unidentified company, well, it doesn't sound exactly on the up-and-up. But he pointed out that the SPAC's primary investors are the most sophisticated--hedge fund managers, mainly--and that they, as a SPAC, aren't going to end up on anyone's index fund or likely impacting 401(k)s and IRAs. Too, that the Securities Act of 1993 put in a number of regulations to protect investors from the penny stock boiler-room type stuff of the '80s.

He described a SPAC as betting on the driver, not the car. That it was the expertise and reputations of the management that formed the SPAC that big-block investors are willing to get behind. Branson's VG Acquire a great example. A SPAC is actually a vehicle that looks more like a limited partnership than a traditional corp or S corp. For example, a minimum 85% of the proceeds from the SPAC going public has to be placed in a trust or escrow that, until an acquisition is made, has to be invested in low-risk government securities. And at least 80% of the SPAC's investors have to approve of the target acquisition; and the SPAC, after formation, has 18 months to make the an acquisition (plus a 6-month grace for a total of 24 months if a deal is announced during the first 18 months but not finalized). So there are steps to mitigate investor risk and keep the acquisition on the level.

On the flip side, while IPOs certainly still happen every week, they're harder to pull off and generally less explosive and publicly visible than they were from the mid-90s through the early-2010s. The three largest IPOs since 2007 were Chinese firms, headed by Alibaba Group in 2014. The last big biotech IPO was Hong Kong's JD Health that raised about $3.5 billion last year. Branson's SPAC offers 23andMe a way to go public without a traditional IPO and reliance on private equity. And it's sort of a "reverse merger" because, unlike big-player private equity (a la Blackstone and Ancestry.com) or a leveraged buyout, with a SPAC there typically isn't an existing management structure waiting to clean house: the acquired company, at least initially, keeps control of its operations. While I knew that Georgiadis was gone from Ancestry before the ink had dried on the Blackstone deal, I don't think we'll see Anne Wojcicki go anywhere anytime soon.

All that said, the frequency of the use of SPACs has been going through the roof...well, as a growth percentage. And I don't really know what to make of that. In 2016 there were 13 SPACs formed to the tune of $3.5 billion, and in 2019 there were 59 and they raised a total of $13.6 billion. In 2020 we saw 242 SPAC IPOs raising $83 billion. It still isn't quite February yet and 2021 has already had a whopping 91 SPAC IPOs raising $25.4 billion (https://spacinsider.com/stats/).

I hear your fear about a bubble. The pandemic is chopping away at millions of small and mid-size businesses, not to mention the entire T&E sector; we're more dependent upon global economic conditions than ever before, and political and particularly pandemic factors there are kinda scary to consider; the market remains extremely high, I think artificially so in some respects; interest rates really can't be lowered any further as a practical matter; the federal government has been and likely will be printing scads of money in the form of pandemic stimulus payouts; we have a new administration that is less business focused and, Green New Deal or no, will certainly be spending more deficit on environmental and other issues that, while maybe super-great in the long term, may hurt the economy in the short term. And we have a big spike in blank-check SPACs raising billions in the markets for speculative acquisitions. I know it's just me getting more risk-averse as I get older, but I gotta admit that lately I've been moving aggressive investments to conservative ones, and have even been shifting stuff into precious metals. Economic recovery from COVID is going to be a marathon, not a sprint. Too many small businesses are going to shutter permanently with too many owners having exhausted their savings trying to keep them afloat. I think it's inevitable that at least a correction is coming.

Geez. That sounded more pessimistic than I feel. But now that I'm in that train of thought, maybe I'll go shift some more stuff into metals. Ya can't make electronics without metals...  ;-)

I know I post way too much on G2G about business dealings of some genealogy and genetic companies, stuff that may be of concern to about 0.01% of WikiTreers. Subject just interests me. But maybe later I'll rewrite/condense some of the above mess to add as a follow-up to that G2G topic and Darlene's reply. I really don't think we'll have to wait long to find out if we have a VGAC/23andMe deal. If we do, I'm betting there'll be a public announcement within two weeks.

posted by Edison Williams
I never read enough of your posts, Edison. Every time I do I am impressed your breadth and depth of knowledge.
posted by Chris Whitten
Naw. I don't know squat. I just use way too many words, so it LOOKS like I know something.  :-)

But thanks!

posted by Edison Williams
Thank you for the help with Almarinda Bates!

Deb

posted by Deb (White) Atkinson
You are a HOOT! Besides being beyond extremely informative. I always enjoy your G2G posts. I just thought I'd drop by and say hello. I wonder if we'll ever get a chance to meet down there in my home state of Texas?! Take care and quit working so hard!!
Thanks, Darlene! I have solid statistical data that show at least 4.2% of people who read my posts on G2G enjoy them...and 2.3% of those 4.2% actually read the entire post! So you aren't alone!  :-)

I'm trying my best to be done with work-work as of this week and through January 4. Usually I stay busy in Q4, but this right here ain't a usual year by any stretch. The number of memes for 2020 available on T-shirts and coffee mugs is legion. I'm trying to tell the fam to NOT get me one for Christmas, but I'm sure that's an exercise in futility.

And now, suddenly, inexplicably, I have the urge to read a book I've never read: a 2002 young-adult novel by Carl Hiaasen titled HOOT...

posted by Edison Williams
Oh, no!! FOFL!! So give me an idea of your ethnicity estimate. I figured you must have strong Irish roots -- because of your humor. If you aren't Irish, which ethnicity is your largest chunk? I know those of us that have American ancestors for many generations are generally Heinz 57, but still . . . Looking at your tree, you are the most southern Southerner I've ever come across! (Probably one of the reasons I like you.)  ;)

But I know those people weren't Native Americans.

Southern? Whyever would you think I'm a Southerner? I had people arrive in North America north of the Mason Dixon line. Several of them. Well, a few of them. Er, at least two. Maybe.

Okay; so, yeah. If you were to draw a line from Norfolk, Virginia to the Rita Blanca National Grasslands in the Texas Panhandle, we were mostly born south of that. So I sorta guess I see your point. <cough>

I've never been big on atDNA ethnicity estimates. In cases like mine where there's a disappointing lack of diversity, it doesn't indicate much that wasn't already known. And in cases where there IS strong diversity, it more often than not leads to test-taker confusion: "What do you MEAN my twin sister is part Asian?!" But Ancestry's last ethnicity update didn't move the needle much for me, other than introducing 2% Norwegian. Otherwise, in order, the bulk is Scotland (46%), England & NW Europe (25%), Ireland (11%), Wales (10%). As if they can actually delineate, from 1,000 years ago, among Northern Ireland, Southwest Scotland, and Western Wales. It's all WAY too generalized to have any real accuracy.

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go check the refrigerator to make sure everything is thawing correctly for a traditional Thanksgiving. We're having haggis with neeps and tatties, shortbread, and a braw tablet that I make meself with a canny dram o' whiskey, with maybe just a wee bit more in the bottle for after, but dinnae git ooot yer tree!

posted by Edison Williams
Tried to follow your directions. Seemed to go okay until I tried to connect to dad. So now I'm stuck. Something about trusted lists. I clicked on a request to be added, or something like that. I'll call you in a little while.
posted by H. Williams
Hi, Edison

The Ambassadors project has been reorganizing and is looking for those who have a membership at a genealogical society, to help in spreading the word about WikiTree.

We're working on ways to improve how WikiTree connects and interacts with genealogical and local history societies. This is the kind of thing we want to do:

  • Liaise with societies: set up your local society with a free-space page and some WikiTree materials as part of a package.
  • Use social media to promote what societies are offering on WikiTree.
  • Encourage bloggers to blog about societies and the resources available to them on WikiTree.

Are you interested in participating in some way? Do you have some ideas to share?

Azure Rae ~ co-Leader of Ambassadors Project

posted by Azure Robinson
Hi, Azure! Thanks for reaching out. I do maintain a few genealogical society memberships, including a couple not listed on my profile...albeit "active," and using the word very loosely, only in two. However, the nature of my professional time commitments will, I'm afraid, preclude me from consideration. Most weeks have me working 70+ hours, and rare is the day (like today!) that I can find time to even kick back and annoy folks with overlong posts about DNA on G2G.  ;-)

Thanks again, and all the best to the Ambassadors Project!

posted by Edison Williams
Thanks for responding, Edison!

Azure Rae

posted by Azure Robinson
Hi Edison

Thanks for your wonderful summary of the history of Texas in response to my comment. I’m a New Zealander, so it’s not an area of history I know a lot about. I was not being critical of your request, and the decision on including the category is most definitely above my pay grade too.

Fiona

posted by Fiona McMichael
Team Roses has missed you! I am glad we got to work beside us again. You did an amazing job! :-) Emma
Hello, Edison in Hot Texas!

Thanks for all the work you accomplished during our Connect-A-Thon 2020. It is amazing how many more profiles were created and added to our Shared Tree. You have every right to be pleased with your efforts!

Kind regards,

Pippin Sheppard ~ WikiTree’s Appreciation Team

posted by Pip Sheppard
Kia ora from New Zealand Edison, I hope you are doing ok with all your great work on covid. I'm enormously grateful for your response to a query about True Ancestry. I spent some time on the TA fb page asking valid questions about whether the company consults scientific DNA data from archaeological human remains for its consumer results. I received considerable spin from the social media managers on that page and left. I feel idiotic about paying anything to the company as I usually research first but you saved me and others from making the same mistake again. Thank you for being both brilliant and kind.
posted by Jane England
I believe they were twins. I don't have any more info other than what I have posted. It's been a while since I did any other genealogies for my family.

Re: Mary Hirner (Hirner-29) and Josephine Hirner (Hirner-28) are currently set as Rejected Matches to indicate that the two profiles represent different people. Same birth date, same parents, no primary sources, no spouses. Are Josephine Mary and Mary Josephine identical twins?

posted by William Hirner
HI Edison!

Thank you for your time and energy in creating over 1000 contributions to WikiTree for the month of July 2019. Your efforts are appreciated!

Pip Sheppard

WikiTree Appreciation Team

posted by Pip Sheppard
Thanks for joining Team Roses for the CNat and adding 215 profiles to the big tree. You knocked it out of the park!
Hey, Edison, not only are we fellow-Texans, but you also share 11 cM of DNA with my mother. Ha ha! I can't find a genealogical connection except that it is on my Fry branch.
Found it! Meador-3 appears to be the likely connection.
Darnit! I just saw this. Sorry 'bout the delay, Edie; I would never ignore such a stellar Texas cousin.  :-) I have so let actual genealogy lapse this year. By now I thought I'd have had more of my tree entered, but we have Chris Douglas to thank for coming along four months ago and linking an already-extant profile to Drucilla Meador. That's when it looks like our trees first joined; Meador is on my maternal side. We're 8th cousins once removed! Where do I come for Thanksgiving dinner?  ;-) Running the updated Connection Finder on the two of us, I see we also have a by-marriage connection on my paternal line, too. Small world!
posted by Edison Williams
Somehow I missed this post. I just saw that we are actually distant cousins! I'm glad to get that mystery cleared up. I'll have to check out that paternal connection. Sorry about Thanksgiving dinner, but it sounds like you were wrapped up in Haggis for Thanksgiving, anyway. :)
And now I missed your reply! Well, not completely missed it. Just looked at my own profile and there you were as most recent edit! As serendipity would have it, I hadn't looked at that Meador line in months, but just revisited a bit of it a couple of weeks ago.

So. Thanksgiving. On the 25th this year. Never too soon to start planning.  ;-)

P.S. What seems odd is that the "thank Edie" link isn't reverting to the usual "1 thank-you received." I wonder if I can just keep clicking it. Hm. If your "thank you" count suddenly bumps, it was me experimenting...

posted by Edison Williams
Hey! We missed Thanksgiving again! I dropped out of my usual WikiTree life for a good year. Sold a place. Bought a place, but still in Texas. I was messaging someone about triangulation and distant ancestors and pasted one of your G2G articles, I mean comments, in my response to him...with proper attribution to you and a link to the G2G question. After completing my message, I realized I hadn't read any posts by you in awhile and decided to catch up with you for a good laugh. Just reading your profile again was the best laugh-medicine I've had in awhile. I guess the question is, just how long have you sat in a fruit bowl?
Thank you for catching the space in my Gedmatch kit#. Turns out that was preventing it from linking Gedmatch and Wikitree.
posted by Tim Campbell
LOL! No ... I love it.
posted by Susan Keil
Hi Edison, Would you mind taking a look at the following G2G post and offering a response? I'm not going deep enough for the person asking ... Thank you!

https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/719146/segment-differences-between-23andme-and-gedmatch

posted by Susan Keil
Edison,

If you are interested you can place this on YOUR profile page

Edison Williams is a Project Member of the Texas Project.
posted by Mary Richardson
Thank you very much for the research notes you provided on the new Z1a page! Your contribution and support is greatly appreciated.
posted by Susan Keil
Putting. The. Phone. Down. Now.

Backing. Away. Slowly.

Thanks for the virtual pint. It really did calm me down.

posted by Brad Foley