William Peacock Sr.
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Peacock Sr. (abt. 1640 - bef. 1722)

William Peacock Sr.
Born about in Colony of Virginiamap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1 Jan 1704 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of
Died before before about age 82 in Surry County, Colony of Virginiamap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 4,297 times.
US Southern Colonies.
William Peacock Sr. resided in the Southern Colonies in North America before 1776.
Join: US Southern Colonies Project
Discuss: southern_colonies

Contents

Biography

William Peacock first appears in Lawne's Creek Parish in the mid 1670's. His origins are not known. His date of birth is approximated around 1635-1640, based on the age of a wife. There is no conclusive documentation of his arrival in Virginia, so it is an open question if he was born in the colony or in England.

It bears mentioning that one of the few boys that arrived in 1607 was one Nathanial Peacock. He survived the worst years and reached adulthood. However, the burning of Jamestown in 1676 destroyed most of the records so nothing exists that shows what happened to Nathaniel. Yet he was there in the beginning.

What is now known is that William was not the same William Peacock born in 1642, son of William and Agnes Peacock,[1], as the Dry Drayton, Cambridgeshire, parish register shows their young William died within a year or two of his christening. [2]

Lawne's Creek Tithable's Lists 1674-1675

Space:Lawne's_Creek_Parish_Surry_County,_Virginia

William Peacock appears on the Lawne's Creek Parish Tithable's returns dated June 10, 1674. He is grouped together with seven other men with the first named Mr. Arthur Allen. This suggests that William Peacock was working and living on Mr. Allen's plantation at the time.

The same day, the next sheet of returns by another enumerator lists among others, these Tithables: Mr. Oust: Honicutt and next listed is Jno. Kindred

The total number of Tithables for the entire parish is tallied next at 182. This would be all head of households male or female, males above sixteen, and all slaves and free persons of color. From this you can see it is all a very small population.

The next year,on June 10, 1675 we find these individuals on the Lawne's Creek Parish returns:

At Austin Honicutts His Sonn Austin Honicutt, Chas Denisen ; four households down from them is this household: Rich: Harris Law: Mogett , Henry Lewis, James Stringfellow. A few more households down is one led by Walter Taylor.

These families would intermarry each other and with the Peacocks.

Two more references found regarding William Peacock: p. 50 4 May 1686...William Peacock gives Richard Stringfellow one black cow & calfe and a brown Heyfer.William (X) Peacock."[3] There is a record in Surry Co. dated 1686 indicating that at the May 4 court, "Wm Peacock appeareing in Cort & acknowledging a Deede of Guift to Rich Stringfellow and his Sister it is admitted to Record"[4] Now we have a closer connection between William Peacock and the Stringfellow family. Here is an unknown female Stringfellow who may actually have turned out to be William's future daughter-in-law. We may never know for sure, but we know more than we did.

There is no source document showing William Peacock having children, but he is most likely the father of Samuel Peacock, though this has been a question for decades. Samuel Peacock married one Mary Stringfellow, who is the sister of Richard Stringfellow mentioned in the court records listed above. This circumstantial evidence supports William and Samuel having some connection.

William would have been married at an early age, His presumed first wife is not known. William's marriage to Katherine Hunnicutt took place in 1704. This was a late in life marriage for both of them. William was deceased by 1722. His will abstract shows Katherine Peacock inherited William's whole estate. Peacock , William: Leg- To wife , whole estate and makes her exerx. Thos. Walter, Edward Rowell. Presented by Katherine Peacock 9 Oct.1722. Prop July 15 , 1722[5]


Research Notes

Katherine Hunnicutt was the widow of John Kindred. William Peacock was the last husband of Katherine Hunnicutt. The source listed below confuses the two women. The will portion of the source refers to Katherine Andrews the wife of William Peacock Jr.. Katherine Hunnicutt married William Peacock about 1704 .

married BET 1664 & 1670 Surry, VA/ Raleigh County, Virginia [6] (The marriage will be sourced again shortly, but we will go with this date for now- DCO)

There has been a persistent position among early (pre-internet) Peacock researchers that there were three Samuel Peacock generations. William would be a better fit as progenitor with his date of birth at 1640ish, if in fact he was the first Samuel's father. -DCO 2022



Sources

  1. Cambridgeshire : Dry Drayton : St Peter and St Paul : Parish Register : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/5b4093c0f493fd3939eb8bef : viewed 24 May 2022)
  2. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:N82S-77Z : accessed 1 December 2015), Dry-Drayton, Cambridge, England, reference items 2-5; FHL microfilm 1,040,465.
  3. Surry County, Virginia Court RecordsOrder Book 1671-1691 1682-1691 Book IV by Willette Haun, 1990
  4. http://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/stringfellow/664/
  5. Wills and Administrations of Surry County, Virginia. 1671-1750 by Eliza Timmberlake Davis. p. 101
  6. http://www.genealogywise.com/group/peacock
  • Surry County Virginia Tithables, 1668-1703-by MacDonald http://tinyurl.com/Surry-Co-Tithables
  • Will of William Pecock, system number 000528315, the Library of Virginia, 1724 Indexed as 1722. Part of index to wills not listed in Virginia Wills and Administrations. p. 546.
  • Wills and Administrations of Surry County, Virginia, 1671-1750

By Eliza Timberlake Davis, page 101

  • Hunnicutt-HeirsandRoots.com. marriage of William Peacock Sr. To Katherine Hunnicutt , Cornwell , Kindred , Peacock.
  • Ancestors of Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter by Jeff Carter Google Books , marriage of Katherine Hunnicutt , Cornwell , Kindred , Peacock.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with William: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 30

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I intend to edit this profile to bring it into better compliance with current WikiTree standards (see Help:Biographies), to include rephrasing/moving the current all cap warning at the top of the profile. Trudy Roach posted the warning in Nov 2018 and subsequently added the 1704 marriage date but nothing after that and her account is now closed.

Chad and/or US Southern Colonies Project: Does anyone know if there was a space page where people were collaborating on research in addition to what is found in the profile/comments? Also, if anyone reading this would rather do the editing, let me know & I'll cross it off my to-do list :D

Cheers, Liz

P.S. Please feel free to add sources if you have any not currently listed. I've put this profile on my to-do list for the weekend (27-29 May 2022).

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Liz, I would be happy to work on it so that you don't have to do so. I might not complete in your time frame but within a few days of that. :)
posted by Chad Olivent
Thanks Chad! I'll take it off my to-do list. Give me a holler if something comes up that you think I could help with (William's not in my lineage, so what I can contribute is mostly just what I can ferret out online).

Cheers, Liz

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Thank you Liz and Chad- this profile definitely needs some TLC, and it looks like the "DON'T EDIT ME" disclaimer at the top has been there for a few years now, so it is definitely time to give poor William Peacock a proper bio.

I am not aware of any free space page related to the profile. It kind of looks like this profile page was being used as the free space page.

posted by Scott McClain
I think that the William baptized 30 Oct 1642 died the following year - I just added info from the Dry Drayton parish register (as transcribed/posted by freereg).
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Then perhaps the best option is to remove the birth data, since he would not be that William Peacock?
posted by Chad Olivent
It also means that this William's parents are probably not William & Agnes of Dry Drayton & he should be detached from them. Looking at the profile attached as his wife... maybe c1650-55 would be a better birth year estimate for him?
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Peacock-191 and Peacock-171 do not represent the same person because: Reading Peacock-171's bio & comments, it would seem that these profiles were detached as father/son & that William Sr had no known children (this is not contradicted by his will, which leaves everything to his wife).
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Peacock-191 and Peacock-171 appear to represent the same person because: Sources in Peacock-191 refer to William Peacock who died 1722, in Surry county, Virginia, and his wife, Katherine Hunnicutt.
posted by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
Based on the dates and locations, plus the Jr/Sr, I think that it is more likely these profiles are for father & son & that the sources in Peacock-191 are probably an attempt to support that relationship.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
hmm. Except that this profile (for "Sr", Peacock-171) says - I think - that William Jr is not the son of William Sr. This was common for the time and place - that two adults of the same name in the same area but who were not parent/child would be referred to as Sr/Jr in the records based on their relative ages.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Yes, I do not thin that Peacock-191 is an actual separate person that existed and should be merged away because we cannot delete the profile.
posted by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
based on the datafields - born a generation apart and birth/death locations are different - I'm thinking that they are separate people, but lacking any evidence to support the info in the datafields for "Jr", I'll defer to the PMs: Chad & the US Southern Colonies Project.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
This profile was edited without the information on this profile being read. Katherine Hunnicutt Peacock out lived her husband William. Thus the marrage ended at William's death.
posted by Anonymous Roach
I don't think its your William Peacock, but I have so many old birth certificates etc for one branch of the Peacocks...They were from London area Battersea, Wandsworth etc...The names repeat, and its mind boggling at times to view some of it...I have records i think going back to about early 1800's..If anyone ever wants to know..
Hi..I've been back in the hospital, I've only been on sporadically. Is this one of our relatives? I show 10th great-grandfather for me. On ancestry there are records showing Samuel's death, Marriage etc. Are they not correct or a bogus source for some reason? It shows my 9th GG Samuel, is William's son. I am a bit confused. Is there another William Peacock who should be my 10th Grandpa? Thanks~Shanan =)
posted by Shan (Ward) Dawson
I noticed the question on G2gG and had a look at the profile. As there wasn't a source for the date of birth. I looked for one.

There was a baptism (not birth) of William Peacock son of William and his wife Agnes on October 30th 1642 at Dry Drayton, Cambridgeshire.Freereg However, there was also the burial of a William Peacock son of William on 6th June 1643.

posted by Helen (Coleman) Ford
I have detached Peacock-167 , Samuel , and Peacock-191 from Peacock-171 as no documentionation is known to exist that proves these relationships . At one time there was a long standing reward offered to anyone who could prove Samuel was Williams son. William's last wife Katherine Hunnicutt Kindred had a son Samuel Kindred who has often been confused in online trees as being the son of William Peacock.
posted by Anonymous Roach
Since no known documentation exists that proves William Jr. and Samuel are the sons of William Sr. I tend to detach them both as children of William Peacock Sr. There was at one time a reward offered to anyone who had proof Samuel was actually William's son. Any objections please state them in the bulletin section.
posted by Anonymous Roach
To the person who formatted the information on this profile Thank You so very much. It doesn't show in the changes. I appreciate it more than you know.
posted by Anonymous Roach
F. Jay I'm removing the match of Peacock171 and Peacock -191 they are father and son. Thanks for catching my mistake.
posted by Anonymous Roach
I re-proposed the merges when I changed it from an unmerged match. I didn't mean to I meant to compel the merge. F. Jay would mind approving it again. Thank you
posted by Anonymous Roach
Peacock-1020 and Peacock-171 are not ready to be merged because: The merge between these two profiles will take place. I need to source the children in one profile and move them to the son of this William Sr. and attach them to William Jr. Thanks
posted by Anonymous Roach

Featured German connections: William is 23 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 23 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 21 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 23 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 21 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 21 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 23 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 14 degrees from Alexander Mack, 31 degrees from Carl Miele, 18 degrees from Nathan Rothschild, 20 degrees from Hermann Friedrich Albert von Ihering and 18 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

P  >  Peacock  >  William Peacock Sr.

Categories: Lawnes Creek Parish, Virginia Colony | Virginia Colonists