Confusion about the parentage of two Hannah Potts

+1 vote
89 views
The two women were both born Hannah Potts. Potts-2087 and Potts-2005. I believe the husbands of each are correct and well-supported by sources. But I suspect these two Hannahs are linked to the wrong parents! I believe Potts-2005 should be linked to parents Potts-2006 and Unknown-562033. I have cited the reasons why, with sources, in the Research Notes for Potts-2005. (I used the research notes to include a link to a very compelling hypothesis that aligns with my thinking. I also uploaded an image that I believe is not copyrighted that spells it out.)

I believe Potts-2087 should be linked to parents Potts-218 and Borden-1099. The profile manager of Potts-2005 has asked me not to make any changes, and I will not unless I can make a better case for my hypothesis. Or until someone finds credible sources that explicitly link Potts-2005 to Potts-218 and Borden-1099.

Any thoughts or suggestions would be appreciated!
WikiTree profile: Hannah Currie
in Genealogy Help by Suzanne Lowe G2G4 (4.8k points)

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

+8 votes
1 answer
112 views asked Jan 16, 2023 in Appreciation by Stuart Hague G2G3 (3.0k points)
+3 votes
2 answers
426 views asked Feb 28, 2022 in Genealogy Help by Kristen Gere G2G Rookie (220 points)
0 votes
0 answers
+3 votes
1 answer
140 views asked Dec 20, 2019 in Genealogy Help by Simon Croft G2G Crew (360 points)
+2 votes
1 answer
+1 vote
1 answer
+5 votes
0 answers
308 views asked Oct 13, 2012 in Genealogy Help by anonymous G2G Rookie (280 points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...