no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rebecca (DuBois) Vanmeter (1722 - bef. 1806)

Rebecca (Rebekah) Vanmeter formerly DuBois aka DuBoyes
Born in New Paltz, Ulster, Province of New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of and
Wife of — married 7 May 1741 in Philadelphia, Province of Pennsylvaniamap
Descendants descendants
Died before before age 83 in Moorefield, Hardy County, Virginia, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 5 May 2011
This page has been accessed 1,379 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Rebekah (DuBois) Vanmeter was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Rebekah (DuBois) Vanmeter is the descendant of a Huguenot emigrant.

Rebecca DuBois or DuBoyes

Henry VanMeter and Rebecca DuBoyes were recorded as marrying on 7 May 1741[1] in the First Presbyterian Church, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania [2]

Rebecca DUBOIS. [3] Dubois.

Born 14 AUG 1722. New Paltz, Ulster, New York, USA. [4]

Parents Rebecca may have been a daughter of Isaac and Rachel Dubois. The will of Isaac's father Solomon, dated 1756, states that his son Isaac had four daughters, including a Rebecca, and devised land in Pennsylvania to them.[5] This would be after Henry and Rebecca moved to Virginia. Onomastic support for this attribution comes from observing that Henry called one of his sons "Solomon" in his will (abstracted on his profile).

Husband and Children Rebecca married Henry Van Meter in Philadelphia on 7 March 1741.[6] They lived briefly in Pilesgrove in Salem County, New Jersey before moving to Hampshire County, Virginia (now part of West Virginia, just accross the Pennsylvania border).

On 30 April 1741, Henry Van Meter was the third signer to the covenant of the Pilesgrove Presbyterian Church in Salem County, New Jersey, the first two signers being his parents Isaac and Hannah Van Meter.[7]

On 4 February 1741/2, Rebekah, wife of Henry V. Meter Jur., was admitted to communion.[8]

On 26 September 1742 was recorded the baptism of Isaac, son of Henry V. Meter, Jur, & Rebekah his wife.[9]

Died 12 FEB 1806. Moorefield, Hardy County, Virginia, USA. [10]

Buried Pittsgrove Presbyterian Cemetery, Daretown, Salem, New Jersey. OR PA.

Will

The will of Rebekah Vanmeter of Hardy County, Virginia is dated 20 January 1802 and was proved 12 February 1806 in the same place.[11] A transcript follows:

In the Name of God Amen I Rebekah Vanmeter of Hardy County and State of Virginia being weak in body but of sound mind and memory taking into consideration the uncertainty of Life do make and ordain this to be my last & Testament.
First I recommend my soul to the Mercy of my creator & my body to be buryed at the discreation of my executor who is hereby ___ directed to pay all my Just debts and funeral expences Item I give and devise to all and every one of my sons all debts or demands that I have or might claim or demand from them or either of them and desire that they may not be Called on for any settlement on acct. of any thing due or owing me from them or either of them Item my will and desire is that at my death my slave Abigail be emancipated and set at liberty fully and free in every respect and it is further my will and desire that my slave Cuffy son of Abigail be emancipated when he attains to the age of twenty five years and enjoy his Liberty fully in every respect after that age.
Item I give and devise unto my son Jacob Vanmeter the use and Labour of my slave Cuffy from and after the first day of April next until he attains to the age of twenty five years at which time I have directed him to be set at liberty in consideration of this devise to my son Jacob my desire is and I do hereby direct that my son Jacob pay to my son Isaac twenty dollars annually so long as he continues to have the use and labour of my said slave Cuffy Item I give and devise all the rest of my estate unto my five sons to be equally divided between them And Lastly I do Nominate constitute and appoint my sons Isaac and Jacob Vanmeter Executors to this my last will and Testament In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal this twentyeth day Janary one thousand eight hundred & two
signed sealed published and declared in the presence of Isaac Vanmeter, Jacob Vanmeter

Rebekah Vanmeter made her mark.

Research Notes

This profile originally showed Rebecca's death on 8 December 1759 in Salem County, New Jersey. This is erroneous and seems to have resulted from confusion about Rebecca's husband -- see below.

Confusion about her husband

Later in the year following Rebecca's admission to communion in the Pilesgrove church, the record shows Henry Van Meter, Senr and his wife Mary were admitted to communion.

Then we see in the baptismal register both Henry Jr. and Rebecca and Henry Sr. and Mary having children in an overlapping time period, proving that there were two Henrys at this place and time and that the younger was the one who had married Rebecca. Because Henry Jr. is associated through the covenant of the church with his father Isaac, and these church records also associate that same Isaac with Virginia, we can be sure Henry and Rebecca were the pair later producing records in Virginia.

As noted on her husband Henry's profile, some sources have confused him with his uncle Hendrick "Henry" Van Meter. This latter man is the senior Henry who joined the Pilesgrove congregation in 1741. That Henry had several marriages, including one probably within just a few years of Rebecca's marriage to the younger Henry. The elder Henry also had some lineal descendants with connections to Philadelphia, where Rebecca married the younger Henry, so some confusion here is quite understandable.

In particular, this profile originally listed 8 December 1759 for Rebecca's death date. This is the exact date that the elder Henry's will was proved.[12] It is undoubtable that this is not a coincidence. Because the will names no wife, presumably Rebecca's death date was supposed to have been listed as "before 8 December 1759" and we can infer that the person who entered it had erred and thought Rebecca was married to the elder Henry.

Alternate place of birth

Profile Dubois-1959 had her birthplace as Frederick Township, Montgomery, Pennsylvania.

Sources

  1. The Old Style date in the record, in month, day, year format, is 3, 7, 1741. This corresponds to 7 May 1741.
  2. Record of Pennsylvania Marriages Prior to 1810, page 21
  3. Ancestry Family Trees. Record for Rachel DuBois
  4. Ancestry Family Trees. Record for Rachel DuBois
  5. Documents and Genealogical Chart of the Family of Benjamin DuBois of Catskill, New York, (New York: Peter Eckler, 1878), page 15
  6. "Pennsylvania Marriages, 1709-1940", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2WF-R4G5 : 6 February 2020), Henry Vanmeter, 1741.
  7. Turner, page 68
  8. Turner, page 72
  9. Turner, page 77
  10. Ancestry Family Trees. Record for Rachel DuBois
  11. "West Virginia Will Books, 1756-1971," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-HGSX-5K?cc=1909099&wc=Q8BW-M9W%3A179686301%2C179697801 : 21 June 2016), Hardy > Will book, v. 001 1786-1811 page 323 > image 161 of 242; citing Jackson County Clerk, West Virginia.
  12. Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey: Vol. 32, Pages 336-337
  • Wallace, H. E. "The Inskeeps." Moorefield Examiner, Moorefield, W.V. Originally published in 1906. Available online on Burlington County, New Jersey, GenWeb at http://sites.rootsweb.com/~njburlin/inskeepbio.html. The information regarding Rebecca found in this source is: "Mary Inskeep, the eldest daughter [of Joseph Inskeep], married Col. Joseph VanMeter, a son of Henry and Rebecca (du Bois) VanMeter. It is supposed that Joseph VanMeter was born shortly after his father and mother removed from New Jersey to the South Branch."
  • Joseph Brown Turner, "Vital Records of the Pittsgrove, N.J., Presbyterian Church, 1740-1768," Journal of the Presbyterian Historical Society (1901-1930) 9 no. 2 (June 1917), pages 65-94.
  • Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey (The Daily Journal Establishment, Newark, New Jersey, 1880-1949)
  • Ancestry Family Trees. Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile DuBois-799 was created through the import of wikitree1.ged on Oct 17, 2012 by Kimball G. Everingham.
  • The WikiTree profile DuBois-176 was created through the import of LaBach Family TreeApril28_2011.ged on 05 May 2011.
  • The WikiTree profile Dubois-940 was created by Jeffrey Lewis through the import of LewisFamilyTree.GED on May 27, 2013.
  • The WikiTree profile for Rebecca Dubois (Dubois-129) was created through the import of carl&elaine_(grove)_rhodes-10-2-2010.ged on 09 March 2011.
  • Dubois-1278 was created by John Floyd through the import of Van_Meters_Cundiff_HardinCoJDF.ged on Sep 5, 2014.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rebekah: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 19

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Dubois-1959 and DuBois-176 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly intended to be the same person.

No real proof for her parents or birth. In the absence of a true New Netherland record for her, I think that continuing with the DuBois name on the existing DuBois profile is the better choice than revising the LNAB.

Since her presumed parents stayed in Ulster County, I think it far more likely that she was born or baptized in New Paltz than that she was born in Pennsylvania. There are no Dutch church records known for New Paltz from the time of her birth; maybe there is a bible record or a French church record somewhere.

posted by Ellen Smith
Dubois-1959 and DuBois-176 are not ready to be merged because: Certain data to be confirmed.
posted by Schalk Wilhelm Pienaar
DuBois-176 and Dubois-1959 have a proposed merge that has been approved by profile managers on both profiles, but there are large discrepancies between the two profiles (place of birth and date of death are very different), and neither profile cites an identifiable source for the main facts. It seems likely that there has been some conflation of details for two different women.

Could the profile creators and managers provide sources (for example, New Paltz Church records) to substantiate the information?

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Ellen Smith
The death date here is the exact date that will of the other Henry was proved (the Henry who is sometimes mistaken for Rebecca's husband):

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Van_Meter-27

So okay to remove this death date as a clear mistake?

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Barry Smith
Please add your information and sources to the body of the profile(s), Barry. Nothing in this pair of profiles tells the reader where any of the birth and death data came from, nor how many Henry Van Meters (or how many Rebecca Duboises) there were.

I cannot help it if it sounds like I am whining, but we should not be deleting information that we know is wrong until we are able to document for others what it is we know and how we know it.

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Well yes, I thought it goes without saying that we delete from fields, but place a research note with the original information and commentary. My understanding is that "delete" delete with no trace is never appropriate. Am I wrong? But it sounds like you want the order of operations to be adding evidence/commentary first and delete from the field second, so I'll do that.
posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Barry Smith
My concern is that we have two profiles that are, for all intents and purposes, unsourced. Both contain factoids that could have come from anywhere. Rather than deleting one unsourced factoid because you are sure it is wrong, while keeping another conflicting unsourced factoid, I want to see people document the information you have and tell me and other readers what it means.

I have in fact run across a source (although it is just a FamilySearch index record) for the marriage of Rebecca Duboyes, but I lack the background information (or clairvoyance) needed to determine which Henry (and which Rebecca) this might be:

  • "New Jersey, Church Records, 1675-1970," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG54-N3Y9 : 3 October 2019), Henry Van Meter and Rebekah Duboyes, 7 Mar 1741; citing Marriage, Salem, New Jersey, British Colonial America, Archdiocese of Newark, New Jersey.
posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Okay, I have now added a will abstract to Henry's profile, a will transcription to Rebecca's profile, and a will abstract to the attached Henry's father Isaac's profile. This should shore up that Isaac *did* have a son Henry who married a Rebecca who was the mother of , and the 1741 marriage record is in a reasonable time frame.
posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Barry Smith
I have added a bunch of citations to original records on Rebecca's profile, her husband Henry's, his father Isaac's, and Isaac's brother Henry's profile. Now are you okay with removing Rebecca's death date because it is an exact match to the date of proving of Hendrick's will, indicating someone had confused her husband with the elder Henry?
posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Barry Smith
Nice work, Barry. Please remove the bad death date and the Unsourced template.

I guess I have a "thing" about changing controversial information in profile data fields without backing it up with content (and sources) in the profile text. I see the profile data fields as an index to the salient information in the profile, not a substitute for profile text.

The two profiles still will not be ready to merge because they do not contain the information needed to determine her LNAB. I see no reason not to treat her as the daughter of Isaac and Rachel. The 1722 baptism record from New Paltz (or Kingston, if the baptism was recorded there) would determine her LNAB, unless you think there is some reason to believe she was actually born in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, as the other profile claims. The 1741 marriage record shows the marrying couple as Henry Van Meter and Rebekah Duboyes, so Duboyes needs to be in one of the last name data fields in the merged profile. Baptism records for the children of Henry and Rebecca probably have additional spellings.

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Hmm... There are no New Paltz records for the decade in which Rebecca is alleged to have been born, and there is no record for her baptism in Kingston. I am wondering where the date certain of 7 August 1722 comes from.

Additionally, the History of New Paltz indicates that her parents removed to Perkiomen, Pennsylvania. Solomon DuBois owned land there, and he left that land to Rebecca and her three sisters (his granddaughters). It seems likely that Rebecca was born at Perkiomen.

Poking around to try to figure out her family history, I find https://books.google.com/books?id=p7I-AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA45 -- an article in West Virginia Historical Magazine. It is over a century old, so it is not a model of high-quality scholarship, but it may help in assembling the traditional version of the history of this family.

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Perhaps Henry Louis Gates Jr can enlighten us on this . See Vanmeter-188 https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Vanmeter-188

Abraham Van Meter appears to be a son of this Henry and Rebecca...

posted on Dubois-1959 (merged) by Beryl Meehan
DuBois-176 and Dubois-1959 have a proposed merge that has been approved by profile managers on both profiles, but there are large discrepancies between the two profiles (place of birth and date of death are very different), and neither profile cites an identifiable source for the main facts. It seems likely that there has been some conflation of details for two different women.

Could the profile creators and managers provide sources (for example, New Paltz Church records) to substantiate the information?

posted by Ellen Smith
http://www.rootsweb.com/~njburlin/inskeep.htm

This Link under Sources does not work.

posted by Chet Snow
She is a Huguenot descendant.

I note there are 2 widely-divergent death dates - is there another source other than an Ancestry Tree for which is correct? Also, shouldn't her current name be Van Meter ? or did these women not take their husbands' surnames after marriage?

posted by Chet Snow
Dubois-1959 and DuBois-176 appear to represent the same person because:

Hi,

These are the same and can be merged thanks !

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
Dubois-1959 and DuBois-176 do not represent the same person because: different birth dates
posted by John Floyd
Dubois-1959 and DuBois-176 appear to represent the same person because: Please review these potential duplicates.

Thank you. Note the multiple dates of death in bio.

posted by Philip Smith
Dubois-1278 and DuBois-176 appear to represent the same person because: they appear to have the same birth and date, and other vital information are the same.
posted by John Floyd

Featured Auto Racers: Rebekah is 20 degrees from Jack Brabham, 23 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 15 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 15 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 29 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 15 degrees from Betty Haig, 20 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 19 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 13 degrees from Wendell Scott, 16 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 15 degrees from Dick Trickle and 21 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.