- Profile
- Images
Location: [unknown]
Surnames/tags: southern_colonies sources pre-1700
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
![private message](/images/icons/mail.gif.pagespeed.ce.Q4d4kzofWu.gif)
US Southern Colonies Project | Reliable Sources | Sources and Resources Directory
Quick-links for Sources pages US Southern Colonies Project Reliable Sources | |||
Maryland | Virginia Jamestown | Carolinas NC / SC | Georgia |
- This Page has General/Multi-Colony Sources. For Colony Specific Sources, please click on one of the Colony Links above.
This is the Reliable Sources page for the US Southern Colonies Project, which includes profiles covered by pre-1700 project requirements.
This page contains sources focused on the period 1600-1776 recommended (or warned against) by WikiTree's US Southern Colonies Project.
- Note: for resources pertaining to learning about the history of the US Southern Colonies, see: US Southern Colonies History.
- Note: for creating a citation from a website that has not been provided see citing websites. Add the link from the page that you are sourcing.
- After finding a reliable source, care must be taken to establish that the source belongs to your profile.
- Some pages are under development. See also
Contents |
Colony Neutral / Multiple Colonies
- Sources here are colony-neutral or cover multiple colonies. Reminder: books, databases, compilations, and websites are only as reliable as the sources they cite. They are an extra resources in addition to the Colony Specific Reliable Sources pages.
Reliable Sources
Peer Reviewed Journals
- Articles in the following journals are peer-reviewed, typically authored by experienced researchers, and well-cited.
- Blassingame, John W. “American Nationalism and Other Loyalities in the Southern Colonies 1763-1775.” The Journal of Southern History, vol. 34, no. 1, 1968, pp. 50–75. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2205474. Accessed 19 June 2021.
- Journal of the American Revolution. Life in the Southern Colonies: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. move to Resources Page?
Vital Records
Births
- See Individual Colonies
Marriages
- See Individual Colonies
Deaths
- See Individual Colonies
Land Records
- See Individual Colonies
Probate Records
- See Individual Colonies
Tax Records
- See Individual Colonies
Other Records
- Final Payment Vouchers for Those who fought in the American Revolution. ($)
- US National Archives provides access to thousands of Case Files of Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Applications Based on Revolutionary War Service https://catalog.archives.gov/search?q=revolutionary%20war%20pensions&f.oldScope=online&rows=100
Cokayne
- Cokayne's Complete Peerage, 2nd edition, is a reliable source for information about the ancestors of colonial immigrants, although it may not be as useful for the immigrants and their descendants. See the links to online copies provided at
- Joe Cochoit's Complete Peerage page
- this page on Familysearch
- Additional details about The Complete Peerage can be found on the Pre-1500 Resource Page (here).
Reliable Sources with conditions
- Sources here are colony-neutral or cover multiple colonies. Reminder: books, databases, compilations, and websites are only as reliable as the sources they cite.
Biographical Compilations
- Brown, Alexander, The First Republic in America, (1898), 21-40; digital images, Hathi Trust (accessed 2021).
- Robert E. Brown, The Birth of a Nation: A Portrait of the American People on the Eve of Independence. By Arthur M. Schlesinger. With an introduction by Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1968. Pp. viii, 258, xi. $7.95.), The American Historical Review, Volume 74, Issue 4, April 1969, Pages 1357–1359, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/74.4.1357
- Child, Christopher Challender., Otto, Julie Helen. Ancestors of American Presidents. United States: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009.
- Coldham, Peter Wilson, The Complete Book of Emigrants 1607-1660, more details needed
- Crozier, William Armstrong, A Key to Southern Pedigrees, being a comprehensive guide to the colonial ancestry of families in the States of Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia and Alabama; Baltimore: Genealogical Pub. Co., 1953.
- Gandy, Wallace, editor, The Association oath rolls of the British plantations, London: Private Printing (1922).
- Mackenzie, George Norbury, Colonial Families of the United States of America, in which is given the history, genealogy and armorial bearings of colonial families who settled in the American colonies from the time of the settlement of Jamestown, 13th May, 1607, to the battle of Lexington, 19th April, 1775
- Mackenzie, George Norbury, Colonial families of the United States of America..., Vol 6. Baltimore, MD: The Seaforth Press, Genealogical Publishers, 1907 (MCMXVH).
- MacKenzie, George Norbury, Colonial Families of the United States of America, Vol 7. New York, The Grafton Press, 1907.
- Marshall, Michael R., Early Colonial Settlers of Southern Maryland and Virginia's Northern Neck Counties (web site) link
- Richardson, Douglas, Magna Carta Ancestry (2011). Richardson's Magna Carta Ancetry documents connections between the immigrant (Gateway Ancestor) and a Surety Baron. Richardson does not document descendants of the immigrant, although the Gateway's entry may include children and their spouses (in which case, you'll want to explore and access the sources listed following the Gateway's entry).
Surname / Family-Specific Compilations
- Buckner, Bernard, A Blakey book : being an account of those believed to be descended from Thomas and Susannah Blakey of Christ Church parish, Middlesex County, Virginia, Repository, Provo, UT Generations Network, Inc., 2004.
- Ladd, Ruth Kline, One Ladd's family: revisited, Hudson, WI: RK Ladd 2002.
Emigration / Passenger Lists
- This section covers emigration from 1600 to 1776. Passenger lists are generally considered reliable, but the names in compiled lists may or may not reflect a woman's name at the time of her passage (e.g., the 1624/5 Jamestown Muster includes the ship that a settler arrived on but her name at the time of the muster). Information about specific ships can be found on ship category pages (or their companion space pages). Two WikiTree categories are particularly useful:
- Southern Colony Ships excluding Jamestown
- Chesapeake Colony Ships Jamestown
- Jamestown Colony Ships Jamestown
- See also the Ship Index on the Space: Jamestown Colony Index.
- Hotten, John Camden, [https://archive.org/details/originallistsofp00hottuoft The Original Lists of Persons of Quality]... 1600-1700; London, 1874. link; See also extracted names at PackRat Pro.
- Lancour, Harold, 1908-; Wolfe, Richard J, compiler, A bibliography of ship passenger lists, 1538-1825; being a guide to published lists of early immigrants to North America, third edition. New York: The New York Public Library (1963).
- Stevens, Anne, compiler, Pilgrim Ship Lists, Packrat-Pro.
Unreliable Sources
- This page and the colony-specific reliable sources pages focus on sources "this side of the pond" - post-immigration. Other WikiTree projects' reliable sources pages - such as the Magna Carta Project (Magna Carta Project Reliable Sources) and the European Aristicrats Project (European Aristocrats Project Reliable Sources) - should be consulted when looking for colonists' ancestors. Three sources frequently used to support a connection between colonists and the aristocracy are not considered reliable by those projects, and should be considered unreliable for colonists' profiles:
- Burke reference works: Avoid all Burke reference works (including Burke's Peerage, Burke's Dormant and Extinct Peerages, and Burke's Extinct and Dormant Baronetcies). They have many errors. 19th century editions are especially unreliable. Cokayne's Complete Peerage covers some of the same ground (see Cokayne, above).
- Lewis's Database: Marlyn Lewis's "Our Royal Titled Noble and Commoner Ancestors" (ORTNCA) is mostly based on Douglas Richardson's work, which is considered reliable "with conditions" (see Richardson under Biographical Compilations, above), but care must be taken even when it appears that Richardson is the source of information in the database (Lewis includes citations at the end of a phrase or sentence, and sometimes the person's name is the only information given by Richardson).
- Lundy Database: Darryl Lundy's database (thepeerage.com) is largely based on Burke's work. While it can be helpful in identifying possible relationships and lines of inquiry, its use as a source in its own right should be avoided as far as possible.
Examples of Sources that Provide Uncertain Information
Colony Neutral / Multiple Colonies
- The following sources should not be cited and are subject to removal from project-managed profiles if found. If these are the only sources on a profile, please replace it with something better prior to removal.
- Yates' US and International Marriages Index. See this discussion for why.
- Millennium File: "created by the Institute of Family Research to track the records of its clients and the results of its professional research. It contains more than 880,000 linked family records, with lineages from throughout the world, including colonial America, the British Isles, Switzerland, and Germany. Many of these lineages extend back to nobility and renowned historical figures. In fact, one of the things the Millennium File focuses on is linking to European nobility and royalty."
- Edmund West Family Data collections, per their own description, "should be used to find primary sources."
- UNSOURCED user-contributed family trees, including (but not limited to):
- Pedigree Resource Files on familysearch.org
- Public or any other family trees from Ancestry.com
- Geni.com - World Family Tree - RootsWeb / If the tree cites reliable proofs, find the proofs and cite them instead.
- A personal family tree.
- Find-A-Grave. Find-A-Grave profiles rarely cite reliable proofs. When they do, find the proofs and cite them.
- Transcriptions of documents (wills, etc.) found online that are not published.
- A discussion in a genealogy forum. If the discussion cites reliable proofs, find the proofs and cite them.
- Books with family trees/family histories that do not cite reliable sources. These books are secondary sources and should be seen as a starting point. Further research is needed to confirm those relationships.
Additionally, it was very popular in the late 1800s and early 1900s to publish family genealogies. These are much like the online trees of today-- their quality varies depending on the extent to which they cite their sources. Some contain accurate information-- especially about the people living within the last 50 years prior to the publication date; but many have been subsequently proven to be incomplete, inaccurate, or in a few rare cases, downright fraudulent. Absent better sources, these old published genealogies can be cited or included under "See also:". A goal of the project, however, is to find more original documentation, closer to the time of the event being cited.
- Find-a-Grave is a user-contributed site, and as such is generally excluded from the list of reliable sources. Please do not make changes to a profile's vitals, including identification of relations, based solely on information transcribed on a Find-a-Grave profile. The exception is that if the Find-a-Grave profile contains a photo of a contemporaneous gravestone (i.e., a gravestone created and placed at the time of the person's death) and includes information about the person's death, you can cite the Find-a-Grave profile for the death information, and for other information that appears on the gravestone. Please understand, though, that even gravestones may contain erroneous information.
- Lineage Society Applications. Lineage societies such as Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR), Society for Colonials Wars, and others, vary with regard to the proofs that they require for membership. And some, like DAR, have changed their rules over time. Therefore, such applications should be used more as finding aids than actual sources. When looking at a lineage society application, please check what sources they cite, and then seek to find those actual sources.
- Links to sources on paid subscription sites such as Ancestry, FindMyPast, and MyHeritage can be frustrating for WikiTree members and visitors without access to these sites. We recommend searching for a freely available copy of the source document on sites such as FamilySearch, Google Books, USGenWeb, Archive.org, or HathiTrust.
- If the source record is only available to paid subscribers, when providing the URL please also extract as much information as possible, such as relevant names, dates, and the source of the original data.
ALL data that was originally on this page has been permanently moved to a Colony Page. Craig-4574 13:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Login to request to the join the Trusted List so that you can edit and add images.
- Private Messages: Contact the Profile Managers privately: Sandy Patak, Liz Shifflett, Scott McClain, Darlene Athey-Hill, US Southern Colonies Project WikiTree, Laura DeSpain, and David Douglass. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
- Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)
- Public Q&A: These will appear above and in the Genealogist-to-Genealogist (G2G) Forum. (Best for anything directed to the wider genealogy community.)
Is it appropriate to have a sources section and then a section below that listing the 'unreliable sources'? Just saw the see also comment above...can I use that?
Also, I've seen links to pages that need permission to view in the sources section and that seems inappropriate to me.
Looking for guidance....
KIm
edited by Kim (Kroesing) Marcus M.S.
The problem with providing just a list of sources (which you could group into reliable and unreliable) is that the reader doesn't know which fact in the biography you got from which source.
edited by Jack Day
Kim
Jamestown Society is the link for one of the stickers source. [MR]
Maybe Jamestown Sources should just stay on Jamestown page. [MR]
edited by Mary Richardson
The second wave of effort will be to add links ON THIS PAGE to the various colony-specific source pages. Ideally, those pages would also be organized as Reliable, Reliable (with conditions), and Unreliable, then we could link to specific sections within those pages. This wave has not yet begun.
The third wave of activity will be to slowly move those items on THIS page that are colony-specific to their colony-specific source pages (if they're not there already) so that we do not have duplication. This wave of activity has not yet begun.
Fourth wave: there are a number of items listed at the bottom of this page that are not sources, but resources; they need to be reviewed; if still active links, they need to be moved to the appropriate RESOURCE page. This wave of activity has not yet been started.
Fifth wave of activity will be to review those sources that remain on this page, to determine whether or not they have an existing SOURCE profile page; if so, link to it (and update it if necessary); if not create such a page. This wave of activity has not yet begun.
Am I missing any waves?
edited by Jillaine Smith
On the question of semantics.... A recommendation for a needs= category was "Inline Sourcing". I started researching that today (before getting distracted) and was surprised that among the many things the help pages call them, "inline source" wasn't one! However, WikiTree does use citations, references, and footnotes interchangeably (and mean footnote when referring to an inline reference).
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Sources says you can "Embed them as references (footnotes)" or list them below the references tag below the "Sources" heading.
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Sources_Style_Guide has the following:
Perhaps the simplest solution: if something is between ref tags, US Southern Colonies Project refers to it as a footnote with a general rule of thumb that ideally facts in the biography section need to have footnotes providing a reliable source to support those facts; that all of a profile's information needs to say where it came from, regardless of the quality of the source; and that information from unreliable sources would probably be better presented in the Research Notes section instead of the biography.
The Examples section of Help:Sources says
When I have had profiles that included "Reliable with Conditions" sources, the info is in the bio with an inline, er, with a footnote & the entry in the bibliography includes a note to see the project's Reliable Sources page for cautions about using the source. A similar warning that the source is considered unreliable could be used if we have a profile that's only sourced by unsourced Geni or MyHeritage or other online trees.
https://archive.org/stream/originallistsofp00hottuoft/originallistsofp00hottuoft_djvu.txt
FULL TEXT OF: "The original lists of persons of quality; emigrants; religious exiles; political rebels; serving men sold for a term of years; apprentices; children stolen; maidens pressed; and others who went from Great Britain to the American Plantations, 1600-1700 : with their ages and the names of the ships in which they embarked, and other interesting particulars; from mss. preserved in the State Paper Department of Her Majesty's Public Record Office, England"] Searchable format
https://archive.org/details/originallistsofp00hottuoft
We need to figure out how to merge the two.
Your comment must be at least 30 characters long.
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:US_Southern_Colonies_Sources
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&id=GALE%7CA163867853&v=2.1&it=r&sid=zotero&userGroupName=nm_p_elportal&isGeoAuthType=true
Stevenson, Brenda E. "The question of the slave female community and culture in the American South: methodological and ideological approaches". The Journal of African American History Vol. 92, Issue 1 (Winter 2007): ?-?
http://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaxtf/view?docId=wm/viw00110.xml;query=James
Bibliography of Jamestown Sources, Jamestown Archaeological Assessment, 1992-1996, National Park Service, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.