US_Black_Heritage_1880_Project.png

US Black Heritage 1880 Project

Privacy Level: Public (Green)
Date: [unknown] [unknown]
Location: [unknown]
Surnames/tags: black_heritage 1880_census
This page has been accessed 8,824 times.


US Black Heritage Project


US Black Heritage Project
... ... ... is a part of US Black heritage.

Please add the US Black Heritage sticker to every profile for every Black American you create. Add the code below, including the curly brackets, right under the biography heading; it will look like the sticker to the right. This helps us count the number of profiles and honor their heritage.

{{African-American Sticker}}


Contents

About

Goal: To create a profile for every Black American enumerated on the 1880 US federal census.

Total profiles needed: 6,580,793

Why the 1880 census? This is the first census record where household relationships are spelled out. It is also close enough to the time of slavery to help us link enslaved ancestors to descendants. Many formerly enslaved ancestors will still be alive.

Who can help? Every WikiTree member!

How? Click on the spreadsheet linked below for the state you want to work in. On that spreadsheet, put your Wiki-ID in the member column for the person/family you will be creating profiles for. Make sure to add the {{African-American Sticker}} to all profiles you create. If you don't plan to fully build out each profile, please consider using at least one of the USBH maintenance categories. Create profiles, then add the new Wiki-ID to the spreadsheet. Repeat!

Note: The following locations are missing from the 1880 census:

  • Alaska, Hawaii, Oklahoma
  • Kentucky = Crittenden County
  • Michigan = Oscoda and Sanilac Counties
  • Missouri = St. Louis
  • New York = Bronx and Madison and Tioga Counties, New York City (includes all 5 boroughs, Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, and Kings)
  • North Carolina = Guilford County
  • Ohio = Allen County
  • Utah = Rich County
  • Virginia= Henrico and York Counties

Available 1880 Spreadsheets

Many states will have only one spreadsheet with a tab for each county. The states with larger populations will have multiple spreadsheets. More spreadsheets/tabs will be added as people have time to create them.

If you would like to help us set up spreadsheets, please see the Spreadsheet Instructions Help Page.

The number below each state name is the approximate number of Black Americans who were enumerated for that state in 1880.

"List incomplete" means not everyone from the census is accounted for on the spreadsheet yet because the spreadsheet only included heads of households - we are working to add everyone to these spreadsheets.

Alabama
600,545
Arizona
127
FINISHED!
Arkansas
210,666
California
6,018
Full List
Colorado
2,436
Full List
Connecticut
11,547
Full List
Dakota Territories
352
Full List
Delaware
26,442
District of Columbia
59,596
Florida
126,690
Georgia
725,133
Idaho
48
FINISHED!
Illinois
46,368
Full List
Indiana
39,228
Iowa
9,357
Full List
Kansas
43,106
Kentucky
271,451
Louisiana
483,655
Maine
1,365
FINISHED!
Maryland
210,230
Massachusetts
18,697
Full List
Michigan
15,100
Minnesota
1,564
Full List
Mississippi
650,291
Missouri
149,946
Montana
323
FINISHED!
Nebraska
2,385
Full List
Nevada
447
Full List
New Hampshire
832
FINISHED!
New Jersey
38,853
Full List
New Mexico
862
Full List
New York
65,104
North Carolina
531,277
North Dakota: see
Dakota Territories
Ohio
79,815
Oregon
422
FINISHED!
Pennsylvania
85,535
Rhode Island
6,404
Full List
South Carolina
604,332
South Dakota: see
Dakota Territories
Tennessee
403,151
Texas
393,384
Utah
198
FINISHED!
Vermont
1,033
Full List
Virginia
631,616
Washington
402
FINISHED!
West Virginia
25,886
Wisconsin
2,702
Full List
Wyoming
313
Full List


Thank you to our spreadsheet creation helpers for states without space pages

Completed States

  • Arizona
  • Idaho
  • Maine
  • New Hampshire
  • Oregon
  • Utah
  • Washington

Statistics

See US Black Heritage 1880 Census Project Statistics page.

FAQ's

  1. Do I need to create profiles for household members who were not Black?
    You are welcome to create profiles for them if you'd like, but for the purposes of this project, a household can be marked as "Complete" when all of the Black household members and their family members have profiles. So if there is a white person in the household who is related to a Black person (spouse, parent, etc.), the profile should be created. But if there is a white person who is not related (i.e. a landlord-renter or an employer-employee situation), you do not need to create the profile for the household to be considered complete.
  2. Someone on this spreadsheet is not Black. Should I create a profile for them?
    Again, you're welcome to create the profile if you'd like, but you can also just add a note in the WT ID column on the spreadsheet saying "not Black" and go on to the next person on the sheet. Race in the 1880 census was recorded with just a single letter, and often the W for White and the M for Mulatto look very similar and get transcribed incorrectly. Also, people who do not fit in to the four "official" race categories for the 1880 census (white, colored, Chinese, Indian) are sometimes recorded as Black/Mulatto - this is frequently the case for Latinos. It's always best to find several records if possible to confirm if a profile should get the {{African-American Sticker}} in these cases.
  3. I found someone who is not listed on the spreadsheet.
    You can go ahead and add them to the spreadsheet. The spreadsheet creation depends on FamilySearch having the person's residence location and race correctly transcribed and indexed, so there will inevitably be some people who were missed.
  4. The location I want to work on does not have a spreadsheet.
    Please contact Christy Melick or Emma MacBeath and let us know which location you're interested in. We will put it on our to-do list and will let you know when the spreadsheet has been created. Please be patient - we only have a few volunteers who fill these requests. While you wait, please consider working from the existing spreadsheet(s) for the same state. If you are interested in creating the spreadsheet yourself, please see the US Black Heritage 1880 Project - New Spreadsheet Instructions page.
  5. Are we using census categories for this project?
    These are not an official part of this project nor does the USBH project manage census categories - we are just asking people to use general location categories. However, if you feel like a census category would be helpful for your work with the 1880 census project, you may use them. Many 1880 census categories already exist (you should just be using county-level census categories, not specific towns/cities), but if the one you need does not exist yet, Nat Durbin has kindly offered to create them, at least in early 2024 as this project gets going, so that G2G is not flooded with requests. Please send her a private message with "1880 Census Category" in the subject line and make sure to include which county you need a category for and a profile ID of a profile that needs the category.
  6. What location category should I use for these profiles?
    You can always add the location category for their residence location in 1880. If you find additional records, you can also add location categories for birth/marriage/death locations or any other location they lived for a long period of time. Location categories should always be for the most specific location you know, but always a county or smaller (township, towns, cities, etc.) - please do not add state- or country-level categories to profiles. Location categories should not be created for census-designated places (CDP's) - Wikipedia pages for locations will often say if it is a CDP or other type of location and each county on Wikipedia usually has a "Communities" section that will list CDP's separately from other locations (example. If a person's 1880 residence location is a CDP, you may be able to determine which township the CDP is a part of and use the township category. If you can't determine a township to use, you can use the category for the county. Generally, all US counties should already have categories. If the township/town/city/etc you need does not already have a category, they can be requested on G2G.
  7. Is the USBH Project going to do similar projects for other census years?
    There are no plans for this currently. 1880 was deliberately chosen because (1) it is the first census with family relationships stated, so it allows us to create profiles in family groups, and (2) it is close enough to 1865 that many formerly enslaved people were still living and recorded in this census - this project will help us create the profiles we need to eventually be able to more systematically start making connections between people's lives/records after Emancipation and their lives/records before that when they were enslaved. Our Heritage Exchange team is already hard at work on creating profiles and processing documents for enslaved people and this project will be a cornerstone of the USBH project's work to create the post-Emancipation profiles we need to begin making those connections more frequently. Additionally, the 1880 census alone will keep us busy for a while - there were more than 6.5 million African Americans enumerated in the 1880 census and when this project began in 2024, we had ~265,000 African-American profiles on WikiTree.
  8. Where can I ask questions about how to participate in this project? You can ask questions on G2G, just be sure to use the tag black_heritage so that US Black Heritage Project leaders will see it. There is also an 1880-us-census channel in the Challenges and Events section of WikiTree's main Discord server that can be used by any WikiTreer and an 1880-census-project channel on the USBH project's server that USBH project members can use.
  9. Is there a sticker or anything for people who lived in Canada for part of their lives?
    Profiles for Black people who lived parts of their lives in both the US and Canada can use both the {{African-American Sticker}} (placed right below the Biography heading) and the category [[Category:Black History Canada]] (categories are placed above the Biography heading). If you are creating profiles for additional family members who only ever lived in Canada, they would just get the Black History Canada category.
  10. How do I add categories? How do I know which category to use?
    The Categorization help page has a section called How to Categorize a Profile that explains how to add a category. The US Black Heritage Project Categories page has a lot of helpful information about how to pick location categories and maintenance categories, especially in the section Categories to Add to Each USBH Profile. We also have a more detailed help page for our maintenance categories and the section about maintenance categories for the Profile Creation Cycle (Needs Sources, Needs Profiles Created, Needs Biography) are the ones we'd really like people to focus on for the 1880 Census Project.




Collaboration


Comments: 34

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Marshall Brown (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MNWH-NCB) is living in the home of a widow with 2 children and a grandson. The widow is listed as mulatto, the daughters as black and the grandson as mulatto. Thus far I have been skipping those listed as mulatto. Any suggestions on how I should proceed with this family?
Generally, anyone listed as mulatto is considered African-American and we want profiles to be created for them as part of this project. Their profile would get the African-American sticker. In some cases, particularly in the northwest, we've found that "mulatto" was used for people with one white parent and one Native American parent, but for this family in Arkansas, that is probably not the case. So I'd go ahead and create the profiles with the AA sticker.

For Marshall, you can create a profile that is not connected to the rest of the profiles for the household, since there is no familial relationship specified for them. If you'd like, you can add links to their profiles in the text of the biography, though. If possible, we encourage people to do further research to find other family in other sources so that we can connect them up with their families.

posted by Christy Melick
I have a family, 30-year-old woman, listed as head of household and single, with five children. Should I list her with the last name shown on the census, or as Unknown LNAB?
posted by Judith Booker
edited by Judith Booker
Hi Judith, I would use the name on the census, especially if she's marked as single. It can be updated later if we find out it was a married name. Emma
Just to note re: New York - there are only four boroughs mentioned, Brooklyn = Kings County. Staten Island is the one that's missing.
posted by Heather Quinlan
Okay, I think i've misunderstood the category desired for my USBH 1880 profiles. I've been using "US Black Heritage Project, Family Tree Size One" for everybody. is this just for someone who has no family? What category should I put for those individuals who are connected to a souse or children, etc.?
Jean, the Tree Size One category is only for people who have no family at all attached. If the person was born before 1865, you can use Category:USBH Heritage Exchange, Needs Linked if they don't have children attached or Category:USBH Heritage Exchange, Linked if they do have children attached. Does that make sense?
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
edited by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
Thanks for your quick reply, Kate! Still kinda hazy on these categories.

So, if they are born before 1865, have no children attached and no other relatives, should I put both the "...family tree size one" category and the USBH Exchange, Needs Linked category? What if they are connected to a spouse, but have no children? What if they are connected to siblings? Why the specific birth cut-off of 1865?

posted by Jean (Proffitt) Nunnally
edited by Jean (Proffitt) Nunnally
To keep it simple, If they are connected to any family member, you don't need to worry about any of the categories mentioned above. We will be checking all new profiles and adding categories as needed. But to answer your last question, the birth cut off of 1865 is because we have a separate set of categories (called Heritage Exchange) for people who were born during the slavery era.
How do we designate a person who has no family?
You can add this category: US Black Heritage Project, Family Tree Size One (just start typing "tree size one" in the category picker)
posted by Elaine (Weatherall) Martzen
edited by Elaine (Weatherall) Martzen
At how many sources should a profile get the "needs sources" category? I've been doing so for all of those that have only the census, but also for those that only have either another census or a marriage record but not a "vital" record (birth or death). Should I be more, or less, particular about this?
posted by Ariel Hansen
This page discusses the category's use in more detail. It's generally for when you haven't had time to look for all the basic genealogical sources (vitals, census, burial), like if you create a profile for all the children in a family with their census records as children but don't have time to look for records for each one after they leave the parents' home.
posted by Christy Melick
Hi, I came across a source that might be useful to researching some African American families and history in both Canada (New Brunswick) and Maine, whose descendants migrated at least to the Boston area. Is there a free space page for sources? I'm trying to add the source on the individual profile pages, but thought it might be useful more broadly. Here's a link: https://www.uelac.org/Loyalist-Info/extras/Cornelison-William/William-Cornelison-research-v3.pdf

I'm working on members of this family found in the 1880 Census for Maine.

posted by Jaki Erdoes
Thanks, Jaki, I've added the source to both our Maine and Massachusetts resource pages. We have a resource page for each state https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:US_Black_Heritage_Resources_by_State
Here's another question: your FAQ above recommends creating profiles of family members even if those family members are not black. But if we do not know the maiden name of the wife, do you really want us creating profiles for, say, "Lucia Unknown"? I have searched extensively for other records besides the 1880 census, without success. Profile Baptiste-234.
posted by Jillaine Smith
You certainly CAN make profiles for white family members, but you don't have to for completeness. I'm working on Maine and there are a surprising number of interracial marriages. I've been making profiles for the white spouses because I can't not. :) And yes, it's a bummer, but if you don't know the wife's LNAB, it's correct to make LNAB unknown profiles. In this case, whether you make a profile for Lucia is up to you. You've documented that she's Native American in her husband's profile quite nicely.
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
If anyone is interested in further breaking down the status of counties they are working on by town, I've created a table in the Fairfield and Tolland County, Connecticut spreadsheets whose formulas should also work in the others. Just copy the headers and the first row.
posted by Brian Lamothe
Hi Brian, as great an idea as that is, please don't add sort functions to our spreadsheets. This will encourage members to sort while working which we want to discourage. This has already caused havoc when more experienced spreadsheet users sorted a spreadsheet while someone else is working and others could no longer find who they were working on. Can you please remove the sort headers? Thanks, Emma
Filters removed. Since being able to filter the data is extremely useful, I looked into it a bit and discovered that it is possible to create a "Filter View" that is only visible to the active user, leaving the sheet unaffected for other users.

My original comment was actually referring to the table I appended to the far right of the spreadsheets, breaking down completion status by towns in the county.

posted by Brian Lamothe
Okay, the table is cool! Feel free to add any like this as long as they are off to the right like that where people won't accidentally edit them. We have a lot of people helping us who are brand brand new to spreadsheets :-) I added a heading called Stats Breakdown so people will know to look there. Emma
New question: Is it okay to add non-head-of-household individuals to the spreadsheet as we find them?

Before fully understanding the spreadsheets, I searched FS for all black people in Los Angeles County. I found a black woman there, born Virginia, who is not on the spreadsheet because she was not head of household. But when I went to the spreadsheet, I found another black person, head of household, also born in the same decade also in Virginia, same surname, but living in San Francisco. I'd like to add the woman to the spreadsheet on the slight chance that they might be related...

posted by Jillaine Smith
The spreadsheet should include everyone in the household, not just the heads. Can you give me more information about these two women?
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
The western states don't all have all the people listed--just heads of households. This was our first effort at creating spreadsheets :-) If the person isn't on the spreadsheet, yes, please feel free to add them below their head of household. We are working to complete the full lists for these states.
Thanks, Emma! Good to know! :)
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
The black woman I found was a servant in a white household with a completely different surname. Hold on. Here she is (Ann Gardner, row 31): https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33S7-9YBF-SMZP?i=23&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3AM6GB-PGS

The California spreadsheet is sorted by last name at birth (at least it was when I first/last looked at it). Was just going to add her on a row after Abraham Gardner. If you don't want that, please clarify where I should put her in the spreadsheet.

posted by Jillaine Smith
edited by Jillaine Smith
Oh, yeah, I would definitely add Ann Gardner to the spreadsheet.
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
Are we as individual profile creators the profile managers, or should the project be the manager? Do we need to add the project to a "trusted" list, or take any other action as managers?
posted by Ariel Hansen
The Project doesn't need to manage these. You can stay on as manager if you like, but it's also fine to orphan them. We just ask that you put the
US Black Heritage Project
... ... ... is a part of US Black heritage.
on profiles so we can keep track of them!
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
I read the project page, but saw nothing about adding a sticker to the profiles. Where do we get the sticker?

Do we add it to every profile, or just Head of Household?

posted by J. (Jaross) Kirk
Every Black person should get the sticker. The code for the African-American sticker is the phrase African-American Sticker inside double squiggly brackets. You can copy and paste it from the "About" section near the top of this page.
posted by Kate (Gardner) Schmidt
I just added the code at the top of this page as well. Emma
hey Im new to all this history family finding stuff, but maybe someone can research my family, im some african american so maybe that can help
posted by Chara Simmons
Lemuel, Welcome to WikiTree. It would be good to begin by signing the honor code and then I suggest you begin to add your immediate family through your grandparents. There are good WikiTree help pages that your greeter can help you find. Just follow her directions on your profile page.
posted by Gina (Pocock) Jarvi