upload image

The Genealogy of the Descendants of Henry Kingsbury, of Ipswich and Haverhill, Mass.

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Date: [unknown] [unknown]
Location: [unknown]
Surname/tag: Kingsbury
Profile manager: Rick Pierpont private message [send private message]
This page has been accessed 603 times.

Other: Family Genealogies

Contents

The Genealogy of the Descendants of Henry Kingsbury, of Ipswich and Haverhill, Mass.

Available online at these locations:

Table of Contents

  • TBD

Errata

  • No errors in this publication have been identified. When found, please list the problem(s) here, and include a link to a source that describes the problem.

WikiTree Syntax

  • <span id='Kingsbury'></span>Kingsbury, Frederick John. ''[[Space:The Genealogy of the Descendants of Henry Kingsbury, of Ipswich and Haverhill, Mass.|The Genealogy of the Descendants of Henry Kingsbury, of Ipswich and Haverhill, Mass.]]'' (Case, Lockwood & Brainard, Hartford, 1905) [ Page ].
  • ([[#Kingsbury|Kingsbury]])




Collaboration
  • Login to edit this profile and add images.
  • Private Messages: Send a private message to the Profile Manager. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
  • Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)


Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Edwin, I think that is a great idea. I've only found a few errors, in other sources, so I have been adding them to the source free-space page. If you do create a separate free-space page, please link to it from this page and the profiles that are impacted by the error.
posted by Rick Pierpont
Rick, thanks for another great source.

What do you think about possibly including a mechanism to record source errata? Since we have better hindsight on missed facts (due to improved data access), I occasionally find errors or omissions in older published sources.

Maybe we could add a standard freespace errata page when one surfaces a putative source reference error? That way, the source freespace page doesn't get clogged up but another free space page would have sufficient space for a more in-depth commentary about the error.

I'd be happy to set up a model one of these since I believe I found an error of omission (missing child) in this source, p. 138.

Thanks

posted by Edwin Priest

Categories: Sources by Name