Daughter of Thomas Boyd, 6th Lord Boyd of Kilmarnock and his wife Margaret Campbell, daughter of Sir Matthew Campbell of Loudoun, who appears as Lord Boyd's wife in 1658.[1][2]
Children of her second marriage are delineated in the Disputed Origins and Marriages section.
In 1641, Isobel was accused of practicing witchcraft in 1607 and 1608, by Sir Francis Hamilton of Silvertonhill.[1] Jamie Reid-Baxter provides a detailed account of the charges and asserts that accusations were largely based on a failed marriage contract between them from 1607 and failures in his financial matters. Based on the meritless claims and the fact that Isobel was of higher status in Scottish society, his pleas went largely unheard until his death in 1645.[8]
Isobel survived her second husband, for she is mentioned in a bond of 1652 as relict (widow) of Sir Dugald. The bond in question is listed in the "Index of Blair Muniments" prepared by the Miss C. M. Blair of Blair for Her Majesty's General Register House in Edinburgh, Catalog No. GD 167, Box 14, Bundle 2, being dated to 1652 and described as "Bond of Isobel Boyd, relict of Sir Dougall Campbell of Auchnbreck, Kt., as principal, and John Blair of that Ilk, etc., as cautioners, to John Boyd, writer in Edinburgh, for 1,000 merks." Isobel thus died sometime after that 1652 bond.
Disputed Origins and Marriages
Lundy, Darryl Roger (compiler) regarding Isabella Boyd said Isobel was a daughter of unknown Boyd, Bishop of Argyll, citing Mosley, Charles, ed. Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage. 107th ed, vol 1. 2003, p. 666. Wilmington, Delaware, USA: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd. Lundy notwithstanding, The Scots Peerage cites primary sources that prove Isobel was a daughter of Thomas Boyd, 6th Lord Boyd of Kilmarnock and his wife, Margaret Campbell, daughter of Sir Matthew Campbell of Loudon.[1]
Of note also is that Lundy did not list her first marriage to John Blair, younger of that Ilk, only her marriage to Sir Dugald Campbell, and indexes those children thusly:
Grizel / Isabel (Campbell) Stuart, m. Sir James Stuart of Ardmaleish, 1st Baronet of Bute (d. 1662), had issue
Archibald Campbell (d. c. 1630), no issue
Anne (Campbell) Campbell - m. John Campbell 4th of Lochnell, had issue
Mary (Campbell) Chalmers m. John Chalmers (apparently no issue listed in Burke's Peerage)
Marion (Campbell) Maxwell, m. Sir Patrick Maxwell of Newark, had issue
The above references regarding the first marriage are conclusive, as are the mentions of her father, though some references erroneously name him as 5th Lord Boyd of Kilmarnock instead of 6th. Both of her marriages are described in The Scots Peerage.[1]
This section is mainly provided as an acknowledgment that differences in the sourcing appear.
Research Notes
Early writers on the Blair family disagree on the list of children of Isobel Boyd and John Blair, but the list is definitively settled by the Jan. 1604 testament dative and inventory of Isobel's late husband John Blair, younger of that Ilk, which lists only their four daughters Grizel, Isobel, Agnes, and Margaret as surviving children. John testament dative and inventory is found in the Glasgow Commissariot records, recorded in Jan. 1604. In his history of Ayrshire, James Paterson, p.415, quotes from John's testament, saying in a footnote, "John Blair, younger of that Ilk, died in 1604, in the month of January. The 'Inventar' of his 'guidis and geir' was made and given up 'be Issobell boyd, his relict, in name and behalf of Grissell, Issobell, Agnes, and Margaret Blairis, dochteris laull. to the defunct".
Sources
↑ 1.01.11.21.31.41.5Paul, James Balfour. "The Scots Peerage : founded on Wood's ed. of Sir Robert Douglas's Peerage of Scotland; containing an historical and genealogical account of the nobility of that kingdom", Edinburgh: David Douglas, 1908, Vol. V, Archive.org,
p. 167
↑
Burke, John Bernard. Royal Descents and of Founders Kin. Pedigree VIII: James Maxwell Graham, Esq. 1858, p. i. London: Harrison, Bookseller to the Queen.
↑
Note that the Crawfurd and Robertson (1818) text lists no other children of the marriage of Isabel Boyd and John Blair (the Bryce who is mentioned on p. 85 is clearly John Blair's brother). Note that the Blair (2010) article shows that John Blair and Isobel Boyd did NOT have a son Brice Blair: "The return of the jury on 10 Apr 1610 that the next heir male was Brice Blair the next brother is conclusive proof that John Blair younger of that Ilk died 1604 without male issue [C22/4.371v]." Even if John and Isobel had an underage son, by law the retour would have found that underage son to be the next heir male of that Ilk. Finally, John's testament dative (will) and inventory lists only four daughters as the living heirs of John Blair, younger of that Ilk, no sons. This conclusively rules out any sons of John surviving him.
↑
Reid-Baxter, Jamie. Journal of the Northern Renaissance. Issue 4. 2012. Natio Scota. "The Apocalyptic Muse of Francis Hamilton of Silvertonhill (c.1585-1645)." Citing Supplementary Parliamentary Papers. 131. 1641: Petition by the laird of Silvertonhill; 131a. 1641: Paper relating to trial of Dame Isabell Boyd for witchcraft.
Blair of Blair, C. M. (Miss). Index of Blair Muniments at Her Majesty's General Register House, Catalog No. GD 167, Box 14, Bundle 2.
Is Isobel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Isabel, according to Robertson, married John Blair, but Collins' Peerage states that James Stuart of Bute, (d. 1662) married Isabel, daughter of Sir Douglas Campbell of Auchinbrick and Isabel his wife, daughter of Thomas, Lord Boyd, which must mean that Isabel married twice. [Citing Paul (1904) The Scots Peerage. but only a page range is given. Once sufficient detail for a profile or matching is obtained, this note can be deleted.]
Thus, a daughter of Isabel (Boyd) Blair Campbell and her second husband, Sir Douglas Campbell of Auchinbrick is not yet attached. She would be:
Isabel (Campbell) Stuart, who m. James Stuart of Bute, (d. 1662)
I see no evidence presented of uncertainty as to whether Isabel (Boyd) Campbell is the daughter of Margaret (Campbell) Boyd and Thomas Boyd. In fact, 1. her grandmother, Margaret's mother, was also named Isabel, 2. Isabel married a Campbell, 3. she was born during Thomas and Margaret's marriage, and 4. Isabel is listed as one of their children.
Perhaps the [uncertain] button was hit by mistake.
Quite correct. There is no doubt whatsoever that Isobel Boyd was a daughter of Thomas Boyd, 6th Lord Boyd of Kilmarnock, by his first wife Margaret Campbell. The old citation from an out-of-date tertiary source like Burke's alleging she was a daughter of Bishop Boyd has no basis in reality. The primary sources, including the Great Seal charter mentioning the 1589 marriage contract of Isobel Boyd and John Blair, younger of that Ilk, affirm that Isobel was daughter of Thomas and Margaret.
Boyd-2082 and Boyd-10173 appear to represent the same person because: due to the differences in "about" birthdates, matching didn't pick up the duplication. I hate when that happens ;) Please let me know if you have any questions on the minor differences. (In the Sources): Cracroft's Peerage mainly accounts for the differences, and I was about to link to her second husband, but I think the merge can do that, hopefully. Thanks very much, Fann Fann
This week's featured connections are
Canadian notables:
Isobel is
16 degrees from Donald Sutherland, 16 degrees from Robert Carrall, 15 degrees from George-Étienne Cartier, 16 degrees from Viola Desmond, 25 degrees from Dan George, 16 degrees from Wilfrid Laurier, 11 degrees from Charles Monck, 14 degrees from Norma Shearer, 23 degrees from David Suzuki, 19 degrees from Gilles Villeneuve, 18 degrees from Angus Walters and 15 degrees from Fay Wray
on our single family tree.
Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
Thus, a daughter of Isabel (Boyd) Blair Campbell and her second husband, Sir Douglas Campbell of Auchinbrick is not yet attached. She would be:
Perhaps the [uncertain] button was hit by mistake.