Geni has the same gimmick. I dunno if they'll fixed the tree. I already pointed one of the curators to this thread.
And yea you can't trust anything on the Internet. Not just genealogy. I haven't even ADDED anyone past the PGM people and Quebecois stuff in on the main tree on Ancestry. Italy, I am fairly confident in because I've found records to the 1700s for several towns. Working on the commune in San Pietro a Maida.
The reason I initially asked is because I was surfing around on the dynamic tree and found that. I see other people who go far back to 1000s or so. But, I dunno how accurate they are. I do have some notable people in the tree. But, they are from the 1600s. Tristram Coffin, John Putnam and Hannah Duston's sister, Abigail.
That's good enough. This is just hearsay at the 1500s level. I was always a wee bit skeptical about this line. Or any of the others. I've seen the confidence levels.
So, Hugh was my best line? It would make sense if I didn't have connections to the Magna Carta signers. So, I'm not sad/angry or anything. Chop away, man.
Would be nice to get the profile managers of Hugh in here. See where they came up with the parents.
