It appears that Family Search is finished (or nearly so) indexing the 1950 census records and adding source citations to their records. So I have been updating profiles with the new data, but I notice that Family Search seems to have changed its style a little bit. Their source citations no longer include the full URL for a record. They leave off the https://www.familysearch.org/ part and just give you the ark/... part, so you now need to add the first part back manually in order to get a working link. And where their citation would formerly show the name of the subject whose record you were looking at, it may now include other names from the same census record, and it often omits the name of the person for whom the citation is actually intended. And finally, there's that four-character alphanumeric designator at the end of a URL -- that's still being used to uniquely identify each person in a given record, but now the designator shown in their citation doesn't necessarily match the person whose data you're looking at, or the actual URL of the web page you're viewing. So if you routinely copy and paste a Family Search provided citation as a WikiTree source citation, you may need to do some repair to it first.
Fortunately for us the Sourcer app seems to offer a way around the problem. It uses the WikiTree templates to convert the Family Search data and images into real URLs and attach them to the right person, and seems to get it right every time. So I think that's the way to go for these records. But I just can't conceive of any rational explanation for what Family Search is now doing to their source citations, or any realistic expectation about where they might be trying to go with this approach. Does anyone have any insight into what's going on here? If you do, please explain.
(Or if you're thinking that perhaps WikiTree should develop a new 'Anal Retentive' badge for members who become concerned about stuff like this, just give it to me straight! 
)
