no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Newton (abt. 1620 - 1683)

Thomas "Tomas" Newton aka Nuton
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [mother unknown]
Brother of
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 31 Mar 1648 in Middleburgh, New Netherlandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 63 in Long Island, NY, or, Bahamasmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 9 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 3,271 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Newton migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 240)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Biography

Bahamas Project
Thomas Newton is part of a Bahamian family.

Thomas was born in 1612. He passed away in 1683. [1]

From Genealogical and Family History of Central New York:

Thomas Newton, immigrant ancestor, was one of the first five settlers of Fairfield. Connecticut, in the autumn of 1639. The date and place of his birth are not known. In 1644-45 he was chosen deputy to the general court. During the year 1650 he became involved with the authorities of Connecticut, and was imprisoned, but escaped and fled to Long Island. June 20th of the same year, being then or lately of Fairfield, he conveyed certain property there. He was received by the IXitch on Long Island, but his surrender was demanded by the authorities of Connecticut, and he became the subject of negotiations between the commissioners of the United English colonies and Governor Stuyvesant, which extended over several years. In 1655 he was a landholder in Middleburg, and in 1656 paid fifteen shillings, "the Indian Rate" of a shilling an acre there. He was a carpenter by trade. He died before May 28, 1683. He married (first) Dorothea, and (second), March 31, 1648, Joan, daughter of Richard Smith, an early settler of the town of Newport, Rhode Island, 1638, and an inhabitant of Wickford, in Narragansett, about 1639. He was a prominent man in his day and a friend and neighbor of Roger Williams. Children of Thomas Newton: Abigail, married Lodowick Updike: Israel: James: Thomas.

From The Colchester, Conn., Newton family : descendants of Thomas Newton of Fairfield, Conn., 1639: [2]

Thos. Newton of Fairfield, first American ancestor of which we have positive knowledge, in the summer or early autumn of 1«69, was one of the four men that came with Roger Ludlow, deputy governor, whom had obtained a commission from the General Court of Connecticut to begin a plantation at Pequonnock. The other three were Thomas Staples, Edmund Strickland and Edward Jessop.
"The tract of land purchased by Roger Ludlow for the town of Fairfield, embraced within its boundaries the Uncoway and Sasqua rivers, the fine harbors of Pequonnock and Black Rock, and a good harbor at Sasqua" ( p. 4, History of Fairfield, Conn., Schcnck). Page 23S, Vol. II, Hazard State papers say Thomas was a carpenter. The Court records of Connecticut show according to colonial Records of Conn, that June 3, 1G47, "Tho Newton for his misdemeanor in the vessell called the Virgin in giueing Phillippe White wyne wn he had to much before is fyned 5 £."
Thomas was frequently in court with his troubles. Page 144 Colonial Records of Conn., says: "In the action of Mr. Whiting pi Agt Tho Newton deft uppon an attacht returned by constable of Fairfield. Green appeared for Newton & the Jury find for the plant the byll 5 £. 16s. and 2d. vid damages & cost of court. " Again "In the ac of Ed. Hopkins pit agt Tho Newton deft the Jury find for the pi. The deft is to pay 4 £. 13s. 4d. in mony according to the bill 10s damages and cost of Court. "
Savage in Geneological Dic. of New England Vol. 3 says: "Thomas Newton of Fairfield was one of the five first settlers, a man of consequence, chosen representative to April session 1645, had frequent suits at law with his neighbors and in 1652 was charged with a capital crime, probably witchcraft or other imaginary offence; he escaped from prison, took refuge with the Dutch, who believed him innocent. He lived at Newtown on Long Island 1656 a purchaser that year of Middlebury and was a captain under Stuyvesant. By compact with the United Colonies of New England the Dutch were bound to extradit of fugitives as were the members of the United among themselves by Art. VIII of the Confed., and in the record record of the commissioners, Hag IL 229, may be read instructions by Congress to Newman Leverett & Davis to proceed to New York and demand his body and lb 236 their claim of the body of Thomas Newton, some time a capital offender in one of the Cols. of N. E. War was then raging between England and Holland but amicable relations wisely were preserved on our side of the water and Stuyvesant issued a warrant lb 23S on the same day, but we may be glad either cunning or common sense prevented its execution."
At the Court of Elections April 10, 1645, Thomas Newton was chosen a deputy or representative for Fairfield to Gen. Assembly. Page 172 of Col. Records of Conn, show on 23 Dec, 1648 he had suit at law before 'Pellicular Courte of Hartford'. The record is:
"Jonas Wood of Long Island pit contra Thomas Newton Fairfield in an action of the case damages 150£., " and same date and court Thomas Newton pit contra Jonas Wood defendt in an action of the case for breach of covenant to the damages of 2001." Same Court 7 June 1649, Thos Newton pit contra John Copell in an action of debt 8£. & damages 4£." At same Court, same date, page 192, Col. Records, Conn. : "Jonas Wood complaining to this courte that by reason of Thos. Newton failing to performe the virdict of the Jury according to agreement at the Courte In Hartford uppon the 28 day of December, 1648, hee was forced to his great loss and dammage to eatisfie his bond at the Mors ha toes himselfe. This Courte admdgeth to bee due to the said Jonas Wood from the said Thos. Newton according to the aforesaid Verdict and dammages :
For the Bond at the Dutch being 400 Gilders....................................38£.00.0
For so much Jure admdged Newton to pay him more than bond ..30 .00.0
For charge & dammage about it ......................................................... 10 .00.0
...................................................................................................................78 .00.0
Out of wch the Courte discount the 18 £, wch Wood was to pay Newton by the Verdict of the Jury uppon an action of Newton agt. Wood the same day; so there remains to Wood 60 pounds. Execution graunted."
In the action Thomas Newton pi. contra Jonas Wood deft, the Jury finds for the pit. The defdt to deliver to the pit. the two Cowes and the Steare and their increase if any and 20 shillings in Wampun according to the bargaine and if the said cattle cannott bee gott then the deft is to pay 18 1. and costs of Courte.
Col. Records, Conn., show 1648, Thos. Newton. Daniel Frost, Henry Gray, John Green and Fras Andrua were first five farmers and settlers of Plantation of Bankside and had right of possession to all lands enclosed by them and equal shares in future allotments of town lands.
On Tuesday, March 31, 1648, Thomas married Joan Smith. (Page 141-145 Albany Record, Vol. VII.)
In this connection we find he was a widower, his first wife was named Dorothea.
In regard to the marriage with Joan Smith, in history of New Netherland by O Callaghan, Vol. II, page 222, a foot note says:
"We find it recorded of him, that he married in April, 1648, at Flushing to Joan Smith, by Wm Hark, (or Hart), then Sheriff of that place, against. the consent of the woman's parents, and without being legally authorized; by the Supreme Authority. "As this is an indecent and never heard-of manner of marrying, " the sheriff was fined 600 carolus guilders, and "the indecent marriage" was declared null and void. To prevent the daughters of honest and respectable inhabitants being married against their will and without the consent of the parents, by unlawful and unauthorized persona, the bride and bride-groom were fined 300 g£ and ordered to have their marriage again solemnized after three previous proclamations of banns, which was accordingly done" (Alb. Rec. VII, 141-145).
"Thomas Newton, widower of Dorothea Newton, residing at Oakeway (Oncoway), being reconciled, both parties being satisfied with Mr. Richard Smith, with regard to the marriage with his daughter, Joan Smith, now wife of said Thomas Newton, after the usual proclamations have been made, without any opposition, so are Thoma3 Newton and Joan Smith confirmed in the bond of marriage by the Director General and Council, in the presence of the aforesaid Mr. Smith and John Dollingh, on the 10th April, 1643, in New Amsterdam" (Albany Records, Vol. VII).
April 27, 1648, John Underhill appointed Schout-fiscal (sheriff) of Flushing, "vice Harck, dismissed for having married a couple" (p. 44, New Netherland Register, O'Callaghan).
Richard Smith, father of Joan, was held in high esteem by Roger Williams.

In 1652 He was charged with being the father of Widow Elizabeth Johnson's child, Benoni Newton. Since he was married at the time this was considered a capital offense in the Connecticut Colony. He escaped from jail and fled to Long Island under the protection of the Dutch government.[3]

Family

Thomas married (1), Dorothy;[3] he married (2) at Flushing, Long Island, 31 March 1658, to Joan Smith, daughter of Richard Smith, Sr..

Children of Thomas Newton and his wife, Joan Smith:[3]

  1. Thomas Newton
  2. Abigail Newton b. abt 1654 d. 1745 m. Lodowick Updike
  3. James Newton; married Mary Hubbell, daughter of Sergt. Richard Hubbell.
  4. Israel Newton, died at Kingston, Rhode Island in 1720; will proved 9 June 1720.

In 1652 and then a married man, Thomas was charged as the father of a child born to Elizabeth (____) Johnson, widow,[3]

  1. Benoni Newton,[citation needed] born 1652, in Hartford.[citation needed]

Needs

Extractions. Narrative seems mostly a series of lengthy extractions, like a series of mini-biographies. These need to be integrated into a single biography, with inline citations provided for the various claims.

Benoni Newton. How has the identity of this child been proven? Donald LInes Jacobus does not provide a name in History and Genealogy of the families of Old Fairfield ... Jacobus reports only that the child was born tothe widow Elizabeth Johnson? How is the location of this child's birth known?

Sources

  1. Profile created by K Bris through the import of Briscoe Family Tree.ged, 8 Aug 2011, and by Pamela Smith-Irowa through the import of Smith Family Tree.ged 1 Sep 2012. Added information from Florence Broderick, 23 Sep 2012, and from Beardsley family researcher Nick Dann, 21 Nov 2016.
  2. One should read the beginning paragraphs of this work for a discussion of the English origins of this Thomas Newton.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Jacobus, Donald Lines, MA (compiler, editor.) History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield. (Fairfield, Conn.: The Eunice Dennie Burr Chapter of Daughters of the American Revolution, 1930.) p 432, 433

See also:

  • The Colchester, Conn., Newton Family: Descendants of Thomas Newton of Fairfield, Conn., 1639, compiled by Clair Alonzo Newton, Naperville IL, 1911The Colchester, Conn., Newton Family




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test. Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Re-named and re-arranged the "children" section so the reference note is better placed.

Jacobus provides the names of the children born to his second wife, but does not report the name of the child born out of wedlock. Added the latter item to needs.

posted by GeneJ X
History of the Newton Families of Colonial America, Vol. I calls him Moses.

However, the child, given to "Nathaniell Rescew" (Ruscoe) till of age (The Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut, Vol. I, p. 222) appears to have been Benoni (transcribed as "Benjamin" in Ruscoe's will printed in A Digest of the Early Connecticut Probate Records, Vol. I, p. 228).

According to Savage, William Ruscoe (supposed Nathaniel's father) kept the prison at Hartford in 1650. The child, born in prison betw. 15 May 1650 when Eliz. Johnson and Thomas Newton were found guilty (Records of the Particular Court of Connecticut, 1639-1663, p. 82) and 15 May 1651 when the court ordered the child to Nathaniel.

Benoni removed to Southampton, LI with Nathaniel, Jr.

[Daniel Allen Hearn (Legal Executions in New England: A Comprehensive Reference, 1623-1960; 2015; p. 397) attempts to make the case that Thomas1 Newton didn't have a second wife, saying that Jacobus mixed up father and son, and was executed in Fairfield 27 May 1650???]

posted by Patrick Griffith
edited by Patrick Griffith
Hoping for updated guidance from PGM regarding the now-suggestions regarding "Warning 945: Unused Span Anchors."

There are three on this profile--Newton, Leonard and Lull. --Gene

Edited: Changed "Error?" to Warning. See Warning 945 Unused Span Anchors

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
It looks as if the span tags that preface each of these three sources are deleted, namely "<span id='xxxx'></span>", then the warning will go away (note, where I used xxxx in what I said, that would be replaced by Newton, Leonard and Lull, respectively).

We always want to keep the source, but considering the span tags are not referenced in the bio, the Span tags are not required with the source.

Thanks for your help.

posted by S (Hill) Willson
edited by S (Hill) Willson
What seem a series of lengthy extractions appear to make up this biography--like a group of mini-biographies. The apparent titles of the sources lead each extraction but are not otherwise cited as sources.

Added maintenance categories--needs biography, needs inline citations.

posted by GeneJ X
Newton-3527 and Newton-1101 appear to represent the same person because: Both have the same person as a son and therefore the two profiles must represent the same person
posted by Dale Byers
Newton-1101 and Newton-2841 appear to represent the same person because: Please see the information I added to Newton 2841 which details correct information about Thomas Newton. Newton-1101 seems to have an incorrect spousal relationship which does not appear in The Colchester, Conn., Newton family : descendants of Thomas Newton of Fairfield, Conn., 1639. Can we remove Elizabeth Johnson unless there is a reliable source he was married 3 times.
posted by Elizabeth (Hart) Hyatt

Featured Auto Racers: Thomas is 17 degrees from Jack Brabham, 22 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 16 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 15 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 32 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 16 degrees from Betty Haig, 20 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 18 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 18 degrees from Wendell Scott, 16 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 16 degrees from Dick Trickle and 23 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.