no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hugh Williamson (1720 - 1813)

Hugh Williamson
Born in James River Valley, New Kent County, Colony of Virginiamap [uncertain]
Son of and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 92 in Virginia, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Jim Williamson private message [send private message] and James Dolan private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Oct 2010
This page has been accessed 1,927 times.

Contents

Biography

More About Hugh Williamson:
Fact 2: PA-Rev War-MD-VA
Fact 3: Emigrated from Wales 1720

Note

Note: # Hugh Williamson
Birth: in Wales 1
1720 in , Wales
Marriage 1 ?
Children
1. Alden Williamson b: 1750 in New Kent, Virginia
Sources:
1. Abbrev: SAP - family info
Title: SAP - family info
Note:
Source Media Type: Letter

Sources

Acknowledgments

  • Entered by Marie Mills, Dec 26, 2011
  • WikiTree profile Williamson-1777 created through the import of My Tree.ged on Aug 10, 2012 by Jennifer Justice. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Jennifer and others.




Is Hugh your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hugh: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Williamson-1778 and Williamson-159 do not represent the same person because: Minimal information, nothing in common except name.
posted by Neal Parker
I have not looked for documentation yet, but I believe 1778 is the father of 159. Unable to confirm at this time.

You are correct however, they are not a match. I never saw anyone suggest they were, but I see two rejections from you and I concur. 946 and 1778 need revisited again however.

posted by Jim Williamson
edited by Jim Williamson
Williamson-1777 and Williamson-159 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth information and son Alden.
Williamson-946 and Williamson-159 are not ready to be merged because: The only similarity between the two is the name/dob; not enough to merge.
posted by Tom Coley
Williamson-946 and Williamson-159 do not represent the same person because: Nothing in common except the name
posted by Neal Parker
Williamson-946 and Williamson-159 appear to represent the same person because: Would the profile mangers please look at these two profiles. They seem to have the same facts, but not all in the correct places
posted by Jean (Cox) Price
Williamson-946 and Williamson-159 appear to represent the same person because: Would the profile mangers please look at these two profiles. They seem to have the same facts, but not all in the correct places
posted by Jean (Cox) Price
Williamson-946 and Williamson-159 are not ready to be merged because: More info needed.
posted by Tom Coley

Featured Auto Racers: Hugh is 22 degrees from Jack Brabham, 25 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 13 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 15 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 29 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 19 degrees from Betty Haig, 23 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 18 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 15 degrees from Wendell Scott, 21 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 15 degrees from Dick Trickle and 17 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

W  >  Williamson  >  Hugh Williamson