Contents |
Thomas Ivie was born before 1519, the son and heir of Richard Ivie of Sodbury, Gloucester.[1] [2]
He married first, Elizabeth, daughter of H. de Keynes[2], before 1539, which is about eight years prior to 1547, by which time Elizabeth had died, and Thomas had remarried. Elizabeth Keynes is named the mother of Ferdinando, and probably the mother of at least three more children, which implies their marriage lasted at least seven years, assuming no twins.
Thomas married second, Elizabeth Malet, daughter of Hugh Malet of Enmore and Isabel Mitchell, by 1547, which is the latest possible birth of her oldest known child, Mary, who was married in 1562.[3] [2] She had at least five more children, whose births are estimated between 1551 and 1571 at the latest. Elizabeth died before December 12, 1592, as she is not named in Thomas' will.
In 1579, he deeded land to Thomas Smith.[2]
By his first wife, Keynes:[2]
and possibly:
By his second wife, Malet:
THOMAS IVYE, of West Kington, Wilts, esq. Will dated December 12, 1592, proved May 21, 1593, by Dr Tho' Hyde. [40 Nevilie.] To be buried in the Ile of West Kington Church, with my father and mother. George Ivye, my heir apparent, household stuff in the 5 chambers, the chamber where he & his wife useth to lie, 100 ewes, my best salte, 11 spoones, wheat & barley, land in Old Sodbury, Gloucr, called Gorland (?) My son Richard Ivye, £40. To my daughter Prudence Stokes,3 my white standing silver cup. My son Hugh Ivye, £177 due to me from William & Edmund Best, & £60 in the hands of Anthony Prater, my son in law. By deed I given an annuity of £6. 13. 4. to William Ivye, elder son of my son Ferdinando Ivye, dec d, & the same to William Ivye the younger, out of my lands in Ambresbury,4 Glouc., now I give £20 to each, to be paid into the hands of George Ivye, their brother. My manor of Brookeborrow, Glouc. p.6
My daughter Margaret, wife of Mr. Richard Digges, £5. To Leonard Ivye, my son, the bed, &c., which my sister Quinton lyeth on. Poor of Castle Combe, 20/, & of West Kington, 20/. My children, George Ivye & his wife, Hugh Ivye & his wife, James Huntley & his wife, Xtopher Stokes & his wife. My sister Quinton & her son's daughter Anne. My sons Richard & Leonard Ivye. William Ivye & William Ivye the younger. To Mary Digges, my daughter, a cloke of fine puke. My friend Dr Thomas Hyde, Chancellor of Sarum, Exor. My sons Hugh & Leonard Ivye, Overseers. Codicil Dec. 12, 1592. Henry Quinton owes by bond, £40. My cousin Clarke for my cousin Elizabeth Broke, £10. My cousin Vachell, £5. My cousin Harwell, which is desperate (sic) £10. p.7
Abstracts of Somersetshire Wills Etc. 1889[4] [5]
Featured Auto Racers: Thomas is 22 degrees from Jack Brabham, 23 degrees from Rudolf Caracciola, 16 degrees from Louis Chevrolet, 18 degrees from Dale Earnhardt, 33 degrees from Juan Manuel Fangio, 18 degrees from Betty Haig, 24 degrees from Arie Luyendyk, 22 degrees from Bruce McLaren, 16 degrees from Wendell Scott, 17 degrees from Kat Teasdale, 19 degrees from Dick Trickle and 22 degrees from Maurice Trintignant on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
Now, if Ferdinando was her only son, we would assume the next heir to Thomas would be one of his other sons named in the Visitation, Richard or Hugh, but it's not. His will names "my heir apparent, George Ivye." Did the Visitation forget to note Thomas' second son and ultimate heir? Or is he not Thomas' son? Ferdinando died before his father, but he left sons, one of whom was his son and heir, George, and this is the line which the Visitation follows: Thomas, whose heir was Ferdinando, whose heir was George.
George was born by the time of Thomas' death, named in Thomas' will, and apparently of age because he received and held the inheritance for his minor brothers. From what I can see, the only source supporting George as son of Thomas is Thomas' will. He does say "my son George" in the codicil, but people were known to be a bit loose with relationship definers at this time. For instance, it would not be a stretch to call a grandson "my son," especially if his father was dead and that grandson was your heir.
So the point here: does it seem likely to anyone else that Thomas' "heir apparent," George, was not his son, but his grandson?