James Clark
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Clark (abt. 1608 - abt. 1689)

James Clark aka Clarke
Born about in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married before 1636 in Englandmap
Husband of — married 17 Oct 1661 in New Haven, New Haven Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 81 in New Haven, New Haven, Connecticutmap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 9,038 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
James Clark migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 66)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Contemporary James Clarks

James Clark of Boston and Roxbury - died 1674; m. Elinor
James Clark of New Haven - died after 1682. Had a son James Clarke (c1641 New Haven-c1713 Stratford)
James Clarke of Plymouth - (c.1636-b. 1731) m. Abigail Lothrop
James Clark son of William Clark and Mary Weston (1602-1648) died in England; spouse of Sarah Harvey

Disputed Origins

William Boardman in 1906 suggested that he may be the son of John Clarke alias Kingman of the Liberty of the Cathedral Church of St Andrews, Welles, Somerset.[1] This suggestion is based upon the 1641 will of John Clarke[2] where he wrote, "To my son James Clerke who is now in New England, if he be living, in money ten shillings."

James is not the son of William and Mary of East Farleigh. Therefore he was not baptized in 1602, nor was he married to Sarah Harvey

From “Genealogical Research in England.” by Alfred Rudulph Justice. New England Historical and Genealogical Register. 74:130. Boston: NEHGS, 1920 (cited below). This is the pedigree of Jeremiah Clark of Rhode Island and does not claim to be the pedigree of James of New Haven or of Boston/Roxbury.

Re: James Clark, son of William Clerke, of East Farleigh, co. Kent, and St. Botolph Aldgate, London, Gent. & his wife Mary Weston (c1579-b1614)

“James, of Aldgate Ward, London, grocer, the testator of 1647, bapt. 31 Oct. 1602; d. between 6 Dec 1647 and 10 Sept 1649; m. (1) about 1630 Sarah Harvey; m. (2) Helen ____ who was living 6 Dec 1647. ...” Children: Mary one year old in 1633, James, Anne

Baptism: 31 Oct 1602 belongs to James Clarke of Aldgate Wood. Baptism: April 1602 is not proved to belong to this James either.

Biography James Clark of New Haven

James Clark [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] (with Sarah?) arrived in Boston in 1637, aboard the Hector with the group destined to settle the Colony of New Haven.[9]

James Clark had two wives. The first wife was the mother of his children. Her surname and given name are unknown.[3] She was mentioned in the records as Goodwife or Sister Clarke, in conjunction with records concerning her daughters[10] and in the meeting house seating assignments.[8] She died after the 11 February 1655/6 meeting house seating and before the remarriage of James 17 Oct 1661.

James Clark married (2) Ann, the widow of John Wakefield on Oct 17, 1661, in New Haven, Connecticut[11]. She died in 1695.[3]

James received grants of land from the jurisdiction of New Haven, and bought and sold parcels. [12]

All men were required to be part of the local militia (trainband). 4 July 1648, James Clarke was complained of for coming late to a squadron training & late on Sabboth with his armes. He explained that his wife was sick which was allowed but he ws fined for coming late to training. He was also complained for absence to a training day, on which Sgt Munson had taken him away. James was surprised that Munson was not in court to clear him. It was remanded to next court.[13]

James did not have an assigned seat in the 10 Mar 1646 meeting house assingment. His wife did. Sister Clarke was seated “on the other side of the door.” Goodwife Clarke was in the 7th row of the seats in the middle (a more prestigious place.) The History of New Haven by Atwater makes a note that it was James Clarke’s wife in the seates on the other side the door. John Clarke’s wife was the other Clarke female. The next seating in the records took place 11 Feb 1655/6. John Clark and his wife died before this seating. James was in the seats on the side. Goodwife Clark was in the long seats, 8th row. This would indicate that it was probably her and not John’s wife who was in the long seats in 1646 as well. The seating chart for Feb 1661/2 places James on the side, his second wife is right up front on the side. This probably indicates she was hard of hearing or could have been placed there to assist one of the other women in the row [14]

5 July 1653 Ellis Mew, lived with John Jones. According to James Clark on a day when Jones and his wife were away from home Mew “came into y roome where his daughter [Susan] who liued wth John Jones also was and offered to abuse her in a filthy way throwing her downe vpon the bed kissing her pulled downe his breeches and would haue forced her but she cryed out and he left her.” Susan’s testimony was about the same but saying that he “discovered her nakedness and his owne too.” Mew “said that hee did throw her vpon the bed and kiss her but that was all and hee intended no hurt and when she bid him let her alone else she would tell her master and dame then he let her alone.” Goodwife Clarke and Goodwife Jones both testified. After a lot of discussion about the truthfullness of the two. Ellis Mew was “for this miscariage be publiquly corrected by whipping.”[15]

James daughter Mary also became embroiled in a matter of “filthy miscarriages” with John Knight who was notorious for having committed such offenses before with young children. Knight was sentenced to be hung. Mary was part of the Judson household at the time and they were taken to task over leaving Knight and Mary together. James and Mary’s mother were admonished for not speaking up sooner. Mary was considered totally corrupted. She confessed to “unclean carriages” with some other boys, and was sentenced to be whipped.[16]

James was the surveyor of highways Apr 1680, constable in Dec 1680, and fenceviewer Apr 1682.[17]

At the time of the third division Dec 1680, there were two in his household, an estate valued at £50.2s, and he owned 20 acres.[18]

He died probably in 1689. His name is in the index of the second volume of probate records. Unfortunately his estate was in the first twenty pages that are missing.[AB] There is a James Clark who continues to appear in the New Haven records until 1682.[19] James' son James went to Stratford by 1664 (children were born there), and there do not appear to be any other likely Jameses in New Haven at the time.

Death date in December 1674, belongs to James Clark of Roxbury.

The following paragraph from the book "The Ancestry of William Boardman"[1] makes reference to a land document which quotes from the probate of James's estate early in 1689:

"The wife of William Chatterton was Mary Clark, daughter of James Clarke (No 198), whom he married about 1660. After the death of her husband she lived some years in New Haven but about 1717 went to live with her daughter Mary Hotchkiss, in Wallingford, and died there February 3, 1722. In a document dated March 8, 1688-9, James and Samuel Clark, administrators of the estate of James Clarke, Senior, give William Chatterton, whom they term "our brother," power to in behalf of his son, Samuel Chatterson, as an heir of James Clarke. [New Haven Land Records, 1: 448.]"

Children

From Families of Ancient New Haven. Jacobus listed them James, Mary, Samuel, (perhaps) Sarah, Susan, Ebenezer.

  • (perhaps) Sarah m. 25 Oct 1650 William Wooding. A marriage in 1650 would indicate a birth about 1630, not later than 1636, making her a first born child.
  • Susan; m. James Kelly of Hartford. The 1653 court record does not give her age but indicates born between 1635 and 1641.
  • James Clark d. 1712; resided in Stratford; m. (1) Deborah d/o John Peacock; m. (2) Hannah d/o William Jones, widow of Patrick Falconer (children b. 1664-1686, his birth say 25 years before child = 1639, or 21 at marriage b. about 1643)
  • Mary d. 3 Feb 1722 Wallingford m. William Chatterton. Mary's 1655 court appearance is indicative of an age 13-18 so born 1637-1642.
  • Samuel d. 22 Feb 1729/30 New Haven; m. (1) 7 Nov 1672 New Haven Hannah Tuttle (1655-1708); m (2) 18 Apr 1717 New Haven Mary d/o John Thompson, widow of Samuel Lines and John Hitchcock. If age 25 when he married b. about 1647
  • Ebenezer, b. 29 Nov 1651 New Haven; d. 30 April 1721 ae 70 Wallingford; m. (1) Sarah _____ (prob not Peck) ; m. (2) 22 Dec 1696 Wallingford Elizabeth Parker, widow of Josiah Royce; She m. (3) 16 Oct 1721 Wallingford Nathaniel Andrews.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Boardman, William F. J., The Ancestry of William Francis Joseph Boardman (Hartford, 1906), page 245
  2. NEHGR 51:115 [1]
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Jacobus, Donald Lines (compiler). Families of Ancient New Haven, Vol I-VIII. and Index Vol IX New Haven: 1931. Reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1974, 1981, 1997. Originally published as New Haven Genealogical Magazine, Volumes I-VIII. (Rome, NY and New Haven, CT 1922-1932). Pp 407-409
  4. Hoadly, Charles J, MA. (editor) Records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven, From 1638 to 1649. (Hartford: Case, Tiffany and Company, 1857.)
  5. Hoadly, Charles J, MA. (editor) Records of the Colony or Jurisdiction of New Haven, From May 1653 to the Union. (Hartford: Case, Tiffany and Company, 1858.). Mary 137-139
  6. Dexter, Franklin Bowditch (editor) Ancient Town Records Vol 1. New Haven Town Records 1649-1662. (New Haven: New Haven Colony Historical Society, 1917.)
  7. Dexter, Franklin Bowditch (editor) [Ancient Town Records Vol II. New Haven Town Records 1662-1684. (New Haven: New Haven Colony Historical Society, 1919.) Index beginning at page 445.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Atwater, Edward Elias, and Lucy M. Hewitt, and Bessie E. Beach. History of the Colony of New Haven to Its Absorption Into Connecticut Meriden, Connecticut: 1902 pp 544, 545, 546, 548, 551, 548
  9. Calder, Isabel MacBeath, 1934. Passengers on the Hector, 1637-1638. In The New Haven Colony, New Haven CT: Yale University Press, pp. 29-31.
  10. Hoadley2, pp 137-139; Dexter1 pp 182, 183
  11. Vital Records of New Haven 1649-1850 Part I. Hartford: The Connecticut Society of the Order of the Founders and Patriots of America, 1917
  12. Dexter1 p 110, 137-139, 284, 396; Dexter 2 p 37, 78
  13. Hoadly1 p. 391
  14. [Atwater 544, 545, 546, 548, 551, 548) Also in colony town records.] [Dexter1 p. 271 p. 511; Dexter 2 p. 219]
  15. Dexter 1 p 182, 183; Full account
  16. Hoadley 2 pp 137-139
  17. [Dexter 2 pp 397, 401, 419]
  18. [Dexter2 p 405]
  19. Dexter, Franklin Bowditch (editor) Ancient Town Records Vol II. New Haven Town Records 1662-1684. New Haven: New Haven Colony Historical Society, 1919.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 54

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Clark-34936 and Clark-1851 appear to represent the same person because: The merge was previously held up because of the erroneous daughter attached to -34936. Sufficient research has been done to prove she was not this James' daughter.
posted by Anne B
Confusions:

The James Clark of New Haven did not have a daughter Mercy who allegedly married John Culver. James Clark and Elinor Wright Clark of Boston did have a daughter Mercy. That Mercy was b 1660 ish so not the wife of John Culver.

John Culver's wife should be Unknown (maybe Mary Unknown) There is no evidence of the surname Clark.

There is ample evidence that the alleged Mercy Clark, wife of John Culver, was not the daughter of James Clark of New Haven or of James and Elinor (Wright) Clark of Boston. I am disconnecting the relationship.

posted on Clark-34936 (merged) by Anne B
Clark-34936 and Clark-1851 are not ready to be merged because: Because of the daughter attached. I think this merge needs to go on hold. The two James appear to be the same and one source says her father is this James, but other sources say not. Not to mention the odd wife. who as far as I've seen doesn't figure into the equation at all.
posted by Anne B
In the currently proposed merge, Clarke-34936 has a child attached not recognized by others and born in the wrong place with a mother who was never married to this James Clark but who is not attached to this James Clark as wife.
posted by T Stanton
Thanks Heather, but please clarify: what does the record you posted below have to do with this *James* Clark?
posted by Jillaine Smith
Here is entry from catalogue at Somerset record office

Deeds relating to Goodalls and Blackhouse messuages, Croscombe. Repository • Somerset Heritage Centre Reference number • DD/SVL/2/4/3 Description • On 2 Oct 1665 Robert Fortescue of Filleigh, Devon, Esq. leased to William Clarke alias Kingman the elder of Croscombe, clothier, John Clarke alias Kingman and Strode Clarke alias Kingman his sons, a houses known as Goodalls and Blackhouse, with lands, in the parish and manor of Croscombe. On 4 Apr 1685 Strode Clarke alias Kingman leased the property to Thomas George of Croscombe, clothier. On 2 Jan 1687 Strode Clarke alias Kingman leased the property to Thomas George and James Bise of Pilton, gent. On 17-18 Dec 1697 Strode Clarke alias Kingman web address https://swheritage.org.uk

This appears to be a duplicate:

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Clark-34936

The birthplace is clearly wrong, so its not surprising if the birth date differs as well. The death date appears to be confused with his son James's death date. Children line up pretty well with names and dates.

posted by Barry Smith
I think that the order of the children given by Jacobus may be wrong. Because Susan was "molested" by Ellis Mew in 1653. I think she was somewhere between 12 and 18 (b. 1635-1641) Likewise Mary was committing unclean carriages in 1655 so between 13 and 18 (b. 1638-1643). I think the order is likely to be Susan, Mary or James, James or Mary, Samuel, Ebenezer.

Sarah m. in 1650 to Wm Wooding seems way off, unless she were an even earlier child. The Sarah listed in the first list m. Marvin and Sill is the dtr of George Clark.

posted by Anne B
I am going to update this profile - heads up
posted by Anne B
The only good childs birth date listed on this profile is Ebenezer (29 Nov 1651) The vital records don't begin until 1649. They are not bapt. in the First Cong. Ch records or the records kept by Davenport transcribed in NEHGS. I can't imagine where else they might have come from. In the interst of accuracy they should be removed. Objections?
posted by Anne B
Which of these Research Notes apply to the family in this profile?
posted by Chris Hoyt
James Clark Research Notes

"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHDX-6MF : 5 November 2017), James Clark, 07 Mar 1694; citing Death, Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States, , town clerk offices, Massachusetts; FHL microfilm 721,179.

"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHDX-6MF : 5 November 2017), James Clark, 07 Mar 1694; citing Death, Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States, , town clerk offices, Massachusetts; FHL microfilm 721,179.

"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHFL-Q51 : 5 November 2017), James Clark in entry for Mary Clark, 25 Jun 1711; citing Death, Cambridge, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States, , town clerk offices, Massachusetts; FHL microfilm 893,860.

posted by [Living B]
England Research Notes

"England, Cheshire Probate Records, 1492-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGBL-DY7 : 3 December 2014), James Clark, 1613; citing Adlington, Record Office, Chester.

England, Cheshire Probate Records, 1492-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FGBS-VM9 : 3 December 2014), James Clark, 1709; citing Dean Row, Record Office, Chester.

posted by [Living B]
England Research Notes

"England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NNC4-DPV : 10 February 2018), ... Clark and Elizabeth Chapman, 02 Jan 1622; citing St. Andrew'S, Canterbury, Kent, England, reference Item 2, index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,751,624.

"England, Essex Parish Registers, 1538-1997," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XKDH-1VG : 18 July 2017), James Clark in entry for Ann Clark, 07 Oct 1683, Christening; citing , Roxwell, Essex, England, Essex Record Office, England; FHL microfilm 571,184.

"England, Cheshire, Land Tax Assessments, 1778-1832," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FP67-5M5 : 8 December 2017), Clark, 1610; citing Nantwich, Cheshire, England, Record Office, Chester; FHL microfilm 1,564,661.

posted by [Living B]

Featured Eurovision connections: James is 27 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 20 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 24 degrees from Corry Brokken, 17 degrees from Céline Dion, 22 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 23 degrees from France Gall, 26 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 24 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 17 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 29 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 27 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 16 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.