no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Francis Bernard Esq (1558 - 1630)

Francis Bernard Esq
Born in Kingsthorpe, Northamptonshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married about 1598 in London,,, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 72 in Kingsthorpe, Northamptonshire, Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 6 Aug 2010
This page has been accessed 4,760 times.
Magna Carta Project logo
Magna Carta Surety Baron Descendant (see text).
Join: Magna Carta Project
Discuss: magna_carta

Contents

Biography

Francis was the son of Francis Bernard and Alice Haselwood.[1] He was born in 1558.[2][3]

Francis lived at Kingsthorpe, Northamptonshire.[2][3]

Francis married Mary Woolhouse, daughter of Anthony Woolhouse (a London haberdasher) and Millicent Strelley, and sister of Elizabeth Woolhouse, who was the second wife of his brother Richard.[2][3][4] They had four children:

Francis died in 1630,[2][3] quite likely at Kingsthorpe, Northamptonshire.

Research Notes

Children

The following children have been previously shown as children of Francis Bernard and Mary Woolhouse, and have been detached in the absence of reliable sources:

Son John is not the John, Barnard-152 who immigrated to Massachusetts.

Sources

  1. Walter C Metcalfe (ed.). The Visitations of Northamptonshire, made in 1564 and 1618-19, Mitchell and Hughes, 1887, p. 3, Internet Archive
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. I, pp. 187-188, BERNARD 15, Google Books
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), Vol. I, p. 346, BERNARD 18
  4. Joseph Hunter. Familiae Minorum Gentium, Vol. II, Harleian Society, 1895, pp. 467-468, Internet Archive
  5. G E Cokayne. Complete Baronetage, Vol. III, William Pollard, 1903, pp. 249-250, Internet Archive
See also:
  • Wikipedia: Sir Robert Bernard, 1st Baronet
  • Frederick Lewis Weis, with additions and corrections by Walter Lee Sheppard and William R Beall. The Magna Carta Sureties, 1215, 5th edition, Genealogical Publishing Company, 1999, p. p. 66, line 46/14
  • "Barnard Pedigree" from the Robert Barnard family papers, 1658-1917 (MS 0541), The Historical Society of Washington, D.C., catalogue entry (pedigree not viewable on the web; not seen when this profile was re-reviewed)

Acknowledgements

Magna Carta Project

This profile was re-reviewed for the Magna Carta project by Michael Cayley on 17 October 2022.
Francis Bernard Esq was identified by the Magna Carta Project in a trail from Gateway Ancestor William Bernard to Magna Carta Surety Baron John FitzRobert that was project approved/badged in March 2015. Over time, the project identified this profile in other badged trails from William Bernard to surety barons Roger le Bigod, Hugh le Bigod, Richard de Clare, Gilbert de Clare, John de Lacy and Saher de Quincy. Francis Bernard Esq also appears in Magna Carta Ancestry in a Richardson-documented trail from William Bernard to surety baron Robert de Ros (vol. 1, pages 186-188 BERNARD) and another trail, to surety William d'Aubigny branches off the Ros trail. These two trails were badged in October 2022. All the trails named above are outlined in the Magna Carta Trails section of William Bernard's profile.
See Base Camp for more information about identified Magna Carta trails and their status. See the project's glossary for project-specific terms, such as a "badged trail".




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Francis's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 18

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I plan soon to do some work on this profile for the Magna Carta Project

- now DONE

posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Added "Disputed Children" section to retain information and links to questionable children added Jan 12, 2019. This information was retained in order to allow research to continue for verifiable sources. The sources provided for the children in question appear to be family trees of unknown reliability.
posted by David Douglass
Liz, I don't know how much more specific you need. MC is merging away profiles (with data being lost/deleted in those merges), and it is akin to Ancestry- by not showing sources. Ancestry has unviewable links, and MC just puts "Douglas Richardson, Plantagenet Ancestry. P___". That is not quoting, or showing, primary sources. There is no difference in someone dropping an Ancestry link, and someone dropping a (purchasable- expensive) book name. The whole point of Wikitree is to provide information- to which many have stated things such as "(such and such) is not a primary source"- and then they have deleted, or detached people from the tree. Richardson has mentioned that he omits people, and makes mistakes, and that his work is not complete.
posted by C (Gervais) Anonymous
M: I take exception to your comment "primary sources, information, and all else being deleted, detached, and discarded" - An Ancestry Family Trees reference is NOT a primary source. I especially disagree with your statement that "You guys are making a mess for people to sort..."

I also do not see how your statements apply to this profile. You obviously are not happy with something that the Magna Carta Project has done. Please be specific about what that is.

In addition, I cannot fathom that you expect all the profiles imported without sources from multiple Ancestry Family Trees gedcoms to remain attached to the profiles they get attached to. If you believe this is what WikiTree guidelines call for, please post that opinion to G2G so that it can be discussed by the community.

Thanks!

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Yes Joe, as you stated "attempts to". You guys are making a mess for people to sort (which had been long ago compiled and was being worked on). It's sad to see the primary sources, information, and all else being deleted, detached, and discarded- based on following one author's stuff. The books also do not (always) have primary sources listed, and Richardson, himself having acknowledged, makes mistakes, leaves out people, and is incomplete.
posted by C (Gervais) Anonymous
I fully agree that relationships ought to be sourced, and Ancestry trees aren’t a good source... I’ve found a number of instances where Richardson has omitted relationships. His forewords accept that his works inevitably have errors and omissions, and that some of his sources are incomplete and not always accurate. Where there’s a relationship on Wikitree for which there seems no good source, but which is found on the web & can’t be proved wrong, what I sometimes do - after commenting on the profile or raising a G2G question - is delete the relationship but refer to it in a research note, with a link to the other profile, as found on the web but not well evidenced. This serves as a warning, may encourage research, & makes it easier to restore the relationship if good sources are found.
posted by Michael Cayley
Gervais, that is not actually true. Richardson attempts to list all known children whether he traces them further or not. Leaving false children attached is just creating false genealogies and decreasing the reliability of wikitree. If Richardson does not list the children, then we need to have some reliable source which does show the relationship.
posted by Joe Cochoit
OK. Well. I just realized that Elizabeth was also recently attached as a daughter - no mention anywhere about her & her profile has only an Ancestry Family Trees source. I was going to detach her too but I suppose this is what Uncertain is for.

M - if you can find a decent source for Elizabeth, please do!

Thanks!

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
M: I also proposed a merge for the disconnected Thomas... it looks like he was confused with the son of a different Francis.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Richardson, as mentioned in G2G discussions, does not list all people. Disconnecting is leaving people without a direction to look for sources.
posted by C (Gervais) Anonymous
Disconnecting Thomas - not listed in Richardson's Magna Carta Ancestry and lacks verifiable sources.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett