I have never seen any proof that Thomas was the son of a French Huguenot and just because someone said it was so and put it in a book doesn't make it so. There is also no proof that Joseph was the brother of Thomas. What I am looking for is actual proof. I would think that the presence of Blanchards in the tiny village of Goodworth Clatford in 1549 would be much more believable that a supposed french ancestry. I think this ancestry deserves a better vetting that saying someone said it was so in 1939 and leaving it at that. Just my opinion.
this is from the Blanchard Message board:
The story about Pierre Jean Blanchard fleeing from Normandy to
Yorkshire is just a fable. One of the key elements of that story is
the supposed continuation of the odyssey in the form of the emigration
of two sons to Massachusetts in the 1600's. That aspect has been
debunked by the Blanchard DNA project, which established that the two
early Mass. Blanchard lines are not paternally related to each other
within the past several thousand years. Another key element is that
Pierre Jean was a Huguenot, and so was his family. However, Thomas
Blanchard, who married John Bent's sister Agnes and emigrated from
Hampshire to Massachusetts, was a member of the Church of England and
had his children baptized in the village church at Goodworth Clatford,
where, in fact, there had been Blanchards as far back as the records
go. Also, according to his marriage licence, he was a (native
English) yeoman -- that's a class designation that excluded
immigrants, even naturalized ones.