Couples where one partner is PPP, the other not

Question

Aukje Jans Viersen (Jans-4915) is PPP her first husband and father of her 8 children not; her second husband is PPP. All the children are PPP. So to connect them is blocked. On the one side we promote a Connect-A-Thon (I enjoyed to assist with 250 connections) and for some reason we are blocked. I am not against PPP, but it should be logical and following clear rules (they are defined). The family I mention here is not notable, just common people, living between 1750 and 1850 - what is the reason to make them (partially) protected: the father is not protected

Comments

It appears the PPP locked status came from a merge because the change log does not indicate when the PPP status was added. It may no longer be necessary but Netherlands Project leader would need to lift the status if it is no longer needed.

Answer 1

hoi klaas,

Het verwijderen van overbodige PPP's is een "work in progress"   Een paar jaar terug hebben we de afspraken erover binnen het project aangescherpt. Kom je er meer tegen, laat het dan even weten, dan kijk ik er naar en verwijder zonodig de ppp.

De meeste PPP's zaten in de overgangsperiode tussen patroniemen en vaste achternamen  om profielen volgens de afspraken van wikitree te laten ontstaan met de Last name at birth als bepalend voor de naam in het profiel. Er ontstonden nl heel veel dubbele profielen.

Comments

heb de PPP van zijn echtgenote verwijderd.