Thanks, Patricia. Are you assuming Burhans-363 is the one with a wife and children in Middleburgh? He could be. But that could also be Buchans-2. (Doesn't help that his name was incorrectly transcribed. If you look at the actual record, you can see that it says Burhans.)
But you're probably right. And the cautionary notes are there, so if any new info surfaces, it can be sorted.
Good catch finding the marriage record! It didn't turn up when I searched.