There will always be the one who likes the old way better. This time it is me.
I agree this is far easier to manage and probably much more useful to most.
I used the old way with blanks and who that number was for help in DNA research, finding the generations and numbering of the missing useful. The numbering of the people not in the database and and referencing back to the number of the generations that are there.
I am finding it hard to explain.
Not a real big issue at present as I did print the list for easy access, however is there a way I can print things the old way with the all the numbers and references back? If not not a huge issue, just asking.
The effort of volunteers to continually update and improve is very much appreciated, with a hint of jealousy, I wish I could do that too. (once was a programmer - now I get lost trying)