Suggestions News and Updates (January 21st 2024) [closed]

+22 votes
838 views

News

Previous News

closed with the note: Outdated
in The Tree House by Aleš Trtnik G2G6 Pilot (812k points)
closed by Aleš Trtnik

2 Answers

+7 votes
Thanks for posting this information and the nifty info for thon info.

Are the state suggestion reports being updated later today or will that wait until next week?
by Tricia Aanderud G2G6 Mach 1 (15.9k points)
They are created now.

Hi, Tricia

The state reports are run with the suggestions update every week.

To find the regional reports, go to the link here:  Suggestion lists by location, and then search for your area of interest.

+7 votes

Hi Aleš

Van Diemen's Land is the former name for Tasmania (in Australia)

The place format "Van Diemen's Land, Australia" is used three times more frequently than any other variation of Van Diemen's Land, and yet it's not currently recognised in the reports and get dumped into "Unknown Region" for Australia.

Could I please have "Van Diemen's Land, Australia" added to the Van Diemen's Land/Tasmania reports so it disappears from the Unknown Region report?

by Mark Dorney G2G6 Mach 6 (65.6k points)
Sure, but I will set it to unofficial location, since it is not "correct". It will prevent the suggestions.

Looking at it, shouldn't Van Diemen's Land be merged with Tasmania? It is the same location in different times.

https://plus.wikitree.com/function/WTShowTable/Table.htm?table=Countries&filter=AUS
Merging them into the same report would make a lot of sense to me, particularly as Tasmania is used for numerous profiles that are actually dated to the Van Diemen's Land period.

Making it unofficial is fine.

Done. They are now all under Tasmania. I also merged reports for Tasmania and Van Damien's Land.

Can you let me know which locations are official (yes in 4th column), Which are not without a suggestion (no in 4th column) and which should make a suggestion (61x in 4th column) I can also adjust the dates in 5th column, since eventually they will generate a suggestion.

Tasmania, Australia Total Off Timeframe
Tasmania, Australia 104098 Yes
Tasmania 7376 Yes
Colony of Tasmania 856 Yes 1856-1900
Van Diemen's Land 547 Yes 1826-1856
Tasmania, Australian Colonies 58 Yes
Van Diemen's Land, Colony of New South Wales 12 Yes -18251203
Van Diemen's Land, Australian Colonies 6 Yes -1856
Van Diemen's Land, Australia 1816 No -1856
Tas 257 616 abbreviation
Tas Australia 3 616 abbreviation
Tasmania Australia 902 617 no comma

Aleš, your table is good to go.

I suspect the omission of “Van Diemen’s Land, Australia” from acceptable place names is just an oversight as it agrees with the accepted formats for the other states/colonies.

It certainly shouldn’t be a suggestion.

I left it set to No as it was before. 

Now I am matching all Australian locations to the Jim's suggestion. Although I am seeing some strange lines like
Colony of New South Wales, Australia is ok while New South Wales, Australian Colonies (which is used more) is not. I will follow the Project's choice.

I have a few detailed questions:

In Victoria Australia I have a line
"Port Phillip District, Colony of New South Wales"
Is that correct?

"Swan River Colony" is not used on any profile.

I am done with the table update. Can someone doublecheck it.

The Australia Project has formats that are "Acceptable" (as listed) and "Not Acceptable" (abbreviations and a lack of commas), and then a bunch of usages that are not classified as one or the other.

Please note there are no "Preferred" formats defined by the Australia Project. Last time this was discussed people essentially agreed to disagree on the "best" place formats.

The British called all of the eastern seaboard "New South Wales" at one point.

"Port Phillip District" was a subdivision of New South Wales that later became Victoria.

"Swan River Colony" is legitimate, but would apply to no more than about 250 profiles, being only in use from 1829 to 6 February 1832. A while back there used be about 50 profiles with this usage, but almost all were used outside the relevant time period, so were corrected.

Re "Australian Colonies", I look at the counts here pretty often and the numbers for this usage only ever go down, never up. I think it probably used to appear in a drop down list, if not on familysearch, then somewhere else.

Related questions

+15 votes
2 answers
+9 votes
0 answers
+12 votes
2 answers
+14 votes
0 answers
+20 votes
4 answers
+19 votes
1 answer
+13 votes
0 answers
+21 votes
3 answers
+15 votes
1 answer
+9 votes
0 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...