Several other researchers and I have gone back and forth over the interpretation of this record for years. Advice needed. Dunning's Mother was Tuscarora, a NC Nation, most of whose members migrated North to join the Haudenosaunee Confederacy after the War of 1713.
My interpretation of this census has always been that the two 'Other Free' were Tuscarora relatives living with Dunning & his family, but maybe I don't understand how a family was enumerated if the HoH was Native. Other researchers insist the OF must have been Dunning and his wife, or one of his siblings.
Dunning's wife at the time was a Mercy/Macy ??? [[Unknown-608339]]. Because of matches to his next neighbour Andrew Priestley's descendants we cannot otherwise account for we suspect she might have been Andrew's daughter, and thus a Priestley, but we have not explored this idea further and I don't know if it holds water. If so it would have been his second marriage and mother of only his last two children.
In 1790 both Andrew and John Priestley were Dunning's next neighbours. Andrew was father of Charles who married Dunning's daughter Mary "Polly". Andrew's son John married Dunning's daughter Margaret. Andrew was German, but he also has an OF in his HH.
How would a family like this be enumerated? Any thoughts?
Camden District - Lancaster County SC 1790 federal census; page 25
Head of Household
Priestly Andrew : 1 m 16+ 1 m -16 2 f 1 other free
Priestley Jno: 2 m 16+ 3 m -16 4 f
Cashilaw, Dunnan: 1 m 16+ 1 m -16 6 f 2 other free
Thank you for any thoughts on the matter!