A possible privacy "leak" concerning a living person...?

+6 votes
272 views
Not going to name real names, so let's pretend I know of a living woman with the birth name Janet Doe who was found in a census record from when she was a child. She is the daughter of John Q Doe, a distant cousin of mine (who is deceased).

I also know that Janet Doe is the daughter of Marjorie Doe (deceased), who was once married to my distant cousin John Q Doe. In fact I am the profile manager for both Marjorie and John Q. Y'all with me so far?

Janet Doe's daughter, Marjorie's granddaughter, created a profile for her mother, identified only as "Living Doe" and the decade in which she was born. (Perhaps I should note that I am NOT on the trusted list for Janet's profile, and she is NOT listed as the daughter of Marjorie and John Q on their profiles, which I do manage.)

I ran a profile search for "Janet Doe"--and the search results turned up her "Living Doe" profile.

And that was when I put it together that Janet Doe and "Living Doe" are the same person, and because I knew both ends, although I didn't know how they connected, I found the middle, despite not being on the trusted list.

Now, I don't think anybody is going to actually mind that I know that Janet is that living Doe, in fact I've corresponded privately with a family member... but might this constitute a privacy breach? Just curious....
in WikiTree Help by Carolyn Comings G2G6 Mach 5 (53.8k points)

2 Answers

+9 votes
Only Living Doe's PM and Trusted List will be able to see anything about her, so I don't think there is a breach of privacy.
by Ros Haywood G2G Astronaut (2.0m points)
Agreed. If you look at a list of "unlisted" profiles, you can see essentially nothing, except last name. On some searches you can see decades when they were born. But you cannot see relationships, biography data, source data, or any other information at all. If you have some additional points of reference, you can make an educated guess about some of the unlisted profiles, but that's all it is - an educated guess. I've got to the point where I'm generally more right than wrong, but I still get it wrong often enough that the privacy is working the way it should.
+6 votes
I agree with Ros that the only way could discover this is with your additional information. John Q. Doe would remain anonymous to the general public.
by Marty Franke G2G6 Pilot (795k points)

Related questions

+14 votes
6 answers
+17 votes
3 answers
+6 votes
3 answers
369 views asked Oct 24, 2018 in Policy and Style by Karen Lorenz G2G6 Pilot (133k points)
+7 votes
3 answers
+14 votes
1 answer
248 views asked Feb 10 in Policy and Style by Danielle Liard G2G6 Pilot (675k points)
+5 votes
1 answer
274 views asked Apr 17, 2020 in Genealogy Help by Richard Rosenberger G2G6 Mach 3 (36.6k points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...