Should these be merged?

Question

I’ve been looking at the Tucker profiles for awhile now. Most of this branch of family is unsourced. I came across the visitation of Kent that gives a short family tree. In it gives the daughter Josea with (Isota) next to the name.

Wikitree has Josea as one profile and Isota as the other profile. Aren’t they one and the same person? They have an attached husband correct however I believe that maybe the Isota and the Josea should be merged.

The visitation also only shows three children. I’m not sure where Thomas came from but it looks as if they should both be merged as well  I’m not sure if they belong to this Family of Tuckers. Maria is the same, I’m not sure that she belongs here  

Any suggestions?

eta, their father has been sourced with the visitation of Kent pic that I put there. Could someone with access please add the link into a bio stating this and take off the unsourced banner.

Second edit , I’m looking at the book Decendants of William Tucker of Throwleigh Devon and it says that the had the following children, George, John, Thomas, Josea. So Thomas should be there.

Comments

I have added the source Visitation of Kent to the profile of https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Tucker-730

As you say, Visitation of Kent indicates that Josea/Isota was one person. I would go with Isota.

Thomas Tucker comes from the book by Ephraim Tucker. Source attached to Tucker-730. Whether that is right or not is another matter, further evidence required.

As to the approximate year of birth of William Tucker, without further evidence we are in guesstimate territory.

---

Thomas should be in there as well. He shows up in Descendants of William Tucker from Throwleigh Devon. Not all of the kids show up in the visitation.

Thanks for adding it to Isota.

Eta I put the things on the Thomas profile. The one that had the correct year of birth.