It depends on what you mean by "rare" really. I assume it is what Frank showed above, a comparison to all other haplogroups... So yes in that sense.
The answer isn't that simple though imho. We have to take demographics into consideration. How many men are actually available to test in the first place. Spencer noted in his paper Macrogenealogy (
http://scaledinnovation.com/gg/ext/NYG&B_webinar.pdf) a testing bias involving Americans because of the unprecedented population growth over the past 200 years. The difference being about 200 to 1 available testers...
He also noted the Power Law that kind of describes the situation as well; "The big get bigger: families/tribes/clades with more people have more children, then more grandchildren, etc, etc"
If you were to compare the number of testers in your haplogroup to the number actually available to test, it might not be rare at all...
Finally the unknown factor... it could simply be people in your haplogroup just are not as interested as those in other haplogroups...lol
If you catch the fever like the rets of us, you might consider starting a Group at FTDNA to answer those questions, maybe one devoted to your country?
