I am the admin of the Beasley Surname Study (Registered at the Guild of One-Name Studies since 2010) and Beasley YDNA Project at FTDNA (Revitalized in 2008). WikiTree is an important part of my work, but I have much more information than I am able to get onto WikiTree. I want to make the available information accessible, but that has been a challenge. Lately, I've been making some progress.
1. I've been developing a central information website at
https://beasgen.net. There is a lot of work yet to be done, but you can get an idea of various links where information can be found. I'm also working on a Beasley communication network for people to find each other with common interests. (Links to resources mentioned in this message can be found at the website.)
2. All of my working Beasley trees are at Ancestry. I have about 140 of them. I'd have a lot more, but I was getting more than I could manage so I had to quit making so many new ones. The trees at Ancestry are Private but Searchable. They are private because I have some speculative work there and I don't want people namelessly copying possible errors. I am happy to share with people with caveats. It is my goal to sort through it all and make more trees public. That's a "work-in-progress". Finding people among all these trees can be difficult especially with the different spellings of the name and having hundreds of Johns and Williams. A solution is in the TNG website at
https://beas-trees.beasgen.net. All of the Ancestry trees are archived there and I've recently been getting them updated and hope to keep it current. The advantage is that searches can be made across all trees. There is no editing done at Beas-Trees. It is archive only. But it IS POSSIBLE to figure out where to find people. This is only an outline of information and sources available.
Because I have so many trees, there is a naming convention for each tree. I welcome inquiries but if you are able to find someone at Beas-Trees of interest to you, give me the details including the name of the Tree in which they are located.
3. The entire project is organized according to YDNA lineages as established by a Y-STR testing. We have 10 confirmed YDNA haplotypes that are identified by color names. More information about that is available at the website noted and at the Project Pages at WikiTree.
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Beasley_Name_Study. Of late, we have been making some great progress into Y-SNP testing, particularly with the Blue Group. (So far).
4. I hope to have a future announcement for a clearinghouse at WikiTree for connecting people interested in Beasley lineages. I watch for all Beasley activity on WikiTree and wherever possible, I try to connect families with the larger lineages. That is hit and miss. It is my watchword that "all Beasleys are connected" somehow and I'd be happy to make that real wherever possible.
5. Of the "Worldwide" Beasleys but 70% are in the US, though all came from England. My work outside of the US is unfortunately lacking. I hope to, eventually, find project partners in England, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada to expand the work. I don't presently have a good coordination mechanisem, but if there are any volunteers, I'll wing it. I'm also interested in partners specializing in Black heritage Beasleys and in application of Autosomal testing. Just sayin'.
6. Understanding that I'll never get ALL project Beasleys into WikiTree nor will I get ALL WikiTree Beasleys into the project, I do have certain objectives. Among these are to assure that all YDNA confirmed lineages are completely documented at WikiTree using MitoYDNA. Again... "work in progress". To that end, I have a categorization system within the project where I tag all identified lineage "Patriarchs" and all YDNA "Tested" men... at least, all I can get. To see the categorization system (work in progress), see
https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Category:Beasley_Name_Study.
6. I have had hundreds of contacts over the years, far outpacing my memory or ability to keep track. But I have kept every genealogy email for nearly two decades and I can look it up. Chances are, I have corresponded with many of you at WikiTree. Chances are, that if we corresponded last week I've forgotten and will need to rely on my email lookup. Your patience is appreciated.