Source: S50 "Census images for England and Wales,"
↑ Source: #S44 England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975; batch I04543-1 film 90584 Bap. 21 Mar 1830 Bridget d/o Thomas & Margaret LAIDLOW
↑ Source: #S50 1841 England Census; HO107; Piece: 170; Book: 18; Civil Parish: Wetheral; CUL; ED: 6; Folio: 4; Page: 2; hsehold of Thomas LAIDLOW indexed on ancestry as LARDLOW
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Roslyn Runciman for creating WikiTree profile Laidlaw-163 through the import of RUNCIMANRos4WikiTreeOct2013.ged on Oct 21, 2013. Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Roslyn and others.
Is Bridget your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Bridget by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Bridget:
Does anyone know what happened to Bridget after the 1851 census? The marriage and death indexes in England/Wales are silent apart from a possible marriage in 1853 Qtr 4 Salford, Lancashire to either Andrew BROUGHTON or Patrick McHALE, and a possible matching death in the same qtr of a Bridget BROUGHTON.
At least one Patrick and Bridget McHALE in census records are of a Bridget nee McHALE born Ireland.
Australia, where at least two siblings went, also doesn't appear to have any immediate suspects.
At least one Patrick and Bridget McHALE in census records are of a Bridget nee McHALE born Ireland. Australia, where at least two siblings went, also doesn't appear to have any immediate suspects.