upload image

Y-DNA E-M35.1 (formerly E3b) Subclades found in WikiTree

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Date: 5 Apr 2015 [unknown]
Location: Cyberspacemap
Profile manager: Peter Roberts private message [send private message]
This page has been accessed 1,796 times.

Home

Y-DNA E-M35.1 (formerly E3b) subclades (redirects to E-M215) shown by YCC shorthand naming (i.e. major haplogroup - SNP name) of DNA testers found in their WikiTree profiles which include results in YSearch.

For the hierarchy of these subclades see M35.1 at Y-DNA Haplogroup E and its Subclades.

Y-DNA E-M35.1 (formerly E3b) Subclades Found in WikiTree

In SNP name order. WikiTreers are encouraged to add to this list. Please show only one example per subhaplogroup.

  1. E-CTS2500 ->->-> -
  2. E-BY4994 ->->->
  3. E-BY172399 ->->-> *
  4. E-L117 ->->-> -
  5. E-L143 ->->-> *
  6. E-L241 ->->-> *
  7. E-L542 ->->-> -
  8. E-L791 ->->-> *
  9. E-M84 ->->-> -
  10. E-M123 ->->-> *
  11. E-M183 ->->-> -
  12. E-PF6748 ->->-> *
  13. E-PF6751 ->->-> -
  14. E-S9725 ->->-> *
  15. E-V13 Wikipedia ->->-> *
  16. E-V22 ->->-> *
  17. E-Z17264 ->->->
  18. E-Z17696 ->->-> *




Collaboration
  • Login to edit this profile and add images.
  • Private Messages: Send a private message to the Profile Manager. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
  • Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)


Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hello WIlliam, I agree. I will work on using this rewording on this page and similar wording for the other pages for the subclades (subhaplogroups). Thanks.
posted by Peter Roberts
It would be more correct to list this as :

Y-DNA E-M35.1 (formerly E3b) Subhaplogroups found in WikiTree The term E3b is archaic & obsolete and should be referenced today only as an indicator of past nomenclature change. The less often this old term is used the sooner it will disappear from everyday usage, which would be for the better.

posted by William Harvey