upload image

About Frauds and Fabrications Categories

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Date: [unknown] [unknown]
Location: [unknown]
Surnames/tags: fraud disproven_existence
Profile manager: Ellen Smith private message [send private message]
This page has been accessed 2,251 times.


Contents

How to Use this Page

This page is intended to assist contributors in creating and working with categories to document genealogical frauds and fabrications.

If you discover a fraud or fabrication with no subcategory in Category: Frauds and Fabrications, follow the steps below:

Post about it to the G2G discussion group.

Posting to the G2G discussion group raises WikiTree awareness, creates web visibility for the problem, and can get you help with the cleanup.

Create a new Frauds and Fabrications category for it.

We generally name these after the perpetrator, if there is one. If the fraud itself has a very well-known name, use that. Otherwise, name it after the major affected family or families; location + affected family also makes sense. See the existing sub-categories for examples.
A new category tag looks like:
[[Category:My Egregious Genealogical Fraud]]
or
[[Category:Preposterous Family Fabrication]]
You create the fraud/fabrication category you want by putting the tag on a profile page; save, switch to profile view, and click the red link. That brings you to the edit page for your new category.
Now, to make it a subcategory of Frauds and Fabrications, just put the following text on your category:
[[Category: Frauds and Fabrications]]

Add a description to the new category page

Describe the situation:

Who perpetrated the fraud, wrote the fictitious genealogy, or made the error.
What and Where: So far as you can, list affected sources, and explain how they were affected. If a published source has described the fabrication or fraud, provide reference citations.
Insert the following text (customized for the particular fraud or fabrication) to explain that profiles in the category are not necessarily fraudulent or fabricated:
This category is a location to identify the profiles of people whose biographies or family histories have been affected by [Named fraud] (Insert Name and identify it as fraud or fabrication). "Affected" is the operative word -- listing in this category does NOT mean that the profile itself is fraudulent; hopefully it is listed because the [fraud or fabrication] has been identified and corrected.

Add profiles to your subcategory

  • Include profiles for people whose genealogy may be affected by the fraud
  • Include profiles for real people who have some false information or connections from the fraud.
  • Include false or fraudulent profiles.
  • Even if the current profile is clear of fake or fraudulent information, it is beneficial to add the profile to the category to alert others to the possibility that the information they have found (and may want to add to WikiTree) may be fabricated.

To add a profile to the category, paste the sub-category tag into the profile at the top: [[Category:Preposterous Family Fabrication]]

Clean up the affected profiles

  • Detach entirely false profiles from real ones, and document the problem in the affected profiles
  • Put your documentation about the fraud or fabrication at the top of the text section of the profile, before the Biography section.
  • If a profile for a person is part of a project or eligible for a project, ask for it to be made project-protected (or do that yourself.) This helps protect it from further false connections.
WikiTree retains profiles for fabricated people to document the fabrication and help prevent new profiles from being created for these people. The profiles will show up on web searches, and if someone tries to recreate one on Wikitree, it should show up as a match or a duplicate, thus alerting its creator to the existence of an issue.

Uncertain and Disproven Existence

Some persons who were the object of frauds really existed, but there is fraudulent information or connections about them which need to be highlighted.

Other persons, however, may never have existed. In this case, it is good to add the {{Uncertain Existence}} template to the file. When you are confident that the person never existed, post a G2G Disproven Existence Notification. This invites others to provide documentation that the person actually existed. If a week passes without such a response, the template {{Disproven Existence}} can replace the Uncertain Existence template, and the fraudulent person be severed from all connections to other profiles. You should also contact the Disproven Existence Project so that they can put the project template on the profile and add the project as co-manager of the profile.

WikiTree generally does not delete files. The value of keeping a fraudulent profile of a non-existent person on WikiTree is that someone later who seeks to create the same profile will be alerted that it already exists.





Collaboration
  • Login to edit this profile and add images.
  • Private Messages: Send a private message to the Profile Manager. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
  • Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)


Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bonnie, I share your discouragement and also I understand that, as a species, homo sapiens is less than sapiens (wise). As long as humans are, well, human, we have a problem with combatting excessive ego, lack of knowledge, emotional attachment to internal imaginations. So, do we give up? I'm probably a fool, but, similar to Sancho Panza, I like to believe that somehow it all makes sense. (And, even if it doesn't, well, it makes me feel better to act as if it does. I'm not meaning to preach here, but to perhaps give you support and encouragement.)
posted by Robin Anderson
I've been sitting on the fence these past months deciding whether WikiTree has a future and can meet it's goal of "an accurate single family tree using DNA and traditional genealogical sources". My expectation, based on years of research, is a significant percentage of genealogists compile, and fabricate trees without sources, adequate research, and documentation. And they are being posted to WikiTree.

The rest of my message is here -

https://weisel-usa.com/home/genealogy/fraudulent-genealogy/

https://weisel-usa.com/genealogy/fraudulent-genealogy/

I conclude WikiTree will never be one accurate, sourced tree given the prevalence of inaccurate and unreliable data. I see no easy way to correct these errors that exist in just my ancestry.

-Bonnie [email address removed]

posted by BD Weisel
WikiTree is certainly a good deal better and more accurate that most online genealogy sites (have you looked at Family Search?). At least here the dubious genealogies and downright lies are challenged and quarantined away from the properly sourced histories. The problem is the people who add the inaccurate data, not WikiTree itself. Why not join a suitable project and get your perceived problems with your ancestry sorted out and project protected?
posted by Jo Fitz-Henry
I would disagree with putting documentation about the fraud or fabrication "above the Biography section." My understanding of WikiTree Style is that no text should go before Biography.

, However, a person who never existed, has no biography. I have been putting a statement like "this person never existed" as the only item in the biography section, and putting everything else about the fraud under Research Notes.

posted by Jack Day
@ Linda - sorry for the confusion. In order to keep track of which profiles have been "project boxed," a parallel category was created. We are currently moving all of the Goodman Genealogy FabricationS profiles to Goodman Genealogy Fabricaton as they are added to the Adjunct project.

With a half dozen volunteers working simultaneously, a spreadsheet just wasn't practical.

In the end, all profiles will be in the second category and the first will be deleted.

We started migrating the more then 2,800 profiles just after New Years and as of the writing of this message, 1,934 have been moved. I anticipate that the "Fabrications" category will be deleted some time in March.

I will annotate both category pages to reflect this in order to avoid any confusion.

posted by SJ Baty
No tag has been "anointed" for this topic. After searching G2G to see what's been used, I decided on "fraud".
posted by Ellen Smith
What tags should be used in the G2G post about a genealogy fraud?
posted by Debi (McGee) Hoag