no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Emma (Conteville) d'Avranches (abt. 1029 - 1103)

Emma d'Avranches formerly Conteville aka de Conteville
Born about in Conteville, Calvados, Basse-Normandie, Francemap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Wife of — married 1044 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 74 in Avranches, Manche, Basse-Normandiemap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Medieval Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Apr 2011
This page has been accessed 21,019 times.
Medieval Project
Emma (Conteville) d'Avranches is managed by the Medieval Project.
Pre-1500 certified?
Join: Medieval Project
Discuss: Medieval

Contents

Biography

Enter known and documented facts about Emma de Conteville here

Research Notes

Did she marry Richard le Goz?

Cockayne states that Hugh d'Avranches was the son of Richard le Goz, Vicomte d'Avranches, and that his mother was Emma de Conteville. [1]

Was Emma a daughter of Herluin de Conteville?

Cawley observes that a manuscript relating to St Werburgh’s Chester records that “Hugo Lupus filius ducis Britanniæ et nepos Gulielmi magni ex sorore” transformed the foundation into a monastery and states that this suggests that the mother of Hugues may have been a uterine sister of King William, and therefore daughter of Herluin de Conteville. However, no indication has been in other primary sources which supports the contention that Hugues was the son of a duke of Brittany. It is assumed therefore that both lines of his parentage have been romanticised in this document to improve his status and reputation. [2]

Reflecting this more recent thinking, C. P. Lewis, writing in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, refers to Hugh's mother as "an unknown mother formerly identified on the basis of unsatisfactory evidence as Emma, supposedly a half-sister of William the Conqueror. [3]

Keats-Rohan thinks there is other evidence which makes it very likely that the wife of Richard and mother of Hugh was a half sister of William the Conqueror. She mentions that the source we have for her name Emma is Dugdale, who is also the source for her parents being Herleve and Herluin. It is because Dugdale is not a medieval source that her name, and her parents, are considered uncertain.[4]

Based on this, the link to Emma Conteville as the mother of Hugh d'Avranches has been disconnected.

She is not listed by Cawley (2006) or Wikipedia as a daughter of these parents.

Sources

  1. G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, pages 164-165. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. Cited by Darryl Lundy. The Peerage: Hugh Avaranches of Chester Last edited 15 January 2017. Accessed November 14, 2017. jhd
  2. Charles Cawley. Foundation for Medieval Genealogy. Medieval Lands Database. Earls of Chester Accessed November 13, 2017 jhd
  3. C. P. Lewis.Avranches, Hugh d', first earl of Chester (d. 1101) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004. Article available on subscription basis only. Article credits C. P. Lewis, ‘The formation of the honor of Chester, 1066–1100’, Journal of the Chester Archaeological Society, 71 (1991), 37–68 [G. Barraclough issue, The earldom of Chester and its charters, ed. A. T. Thacker] · C. P. Lewis, ‘Gruffudd ap Cynan and the Normans’, Gruffudd ap Cynan: a collaborative biography, ed. K. L. Maund (1996), 61–77 · Ordericus Vitalis, Eccl. hist. · A. Farley, ed., Domesday Book, 2 vols. (1783) · D. Bates, William the Conqueror (1989) · F. Barlow, William Rufus (1983) · L. Musset, ‘Les origines et le patrimoine de l'abbaye de Saint-Sever’, La Normandie bénédictine au temps de Guillaume le conquérant, ed. J. Daoust (1969), 357–67 · C. P. Lewis, ‘The early earls of Norman England’, Anglo-Norman Studies, 13 (1990), 207–23 · G. Barraclough, ed., The charters of the Anglo-Norman earls of Chester, c.1071–1237, Lancashire and Cheshire RS, 126 (1988), 23 [no. 13]. Cited by Gordon Banks. [http://www.gordonbanks.com/gordon/family/2nd_Site/geb-p/p301.htm Gordon Banks Family Site. Accessed October 4, 2018 jhd
  4. Keats-Rohan, Domesday People, p. 258

See also:





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Emma's DNA have taken a DNA test. Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I apologize in advance for being a bit snarky, but at the moment there is nothing at all entered under "Biography" which is where anything we know about Emma that is not controversial should go. All that we have so far is properly under Research Notes and I added a couple of the questions that our current discussions seek to address.

Without further evidence that there was in fact a woman named Emma who did any of the things attributed to her, should we add "Uncertain Existence" to her credits?

posted by Jack Day
I am a bit concerned about this reasoning: "Alternate date of birth (no source given): 30 Apr 1039. This date doesn't work with the bulk of the children listed for her...". I guess we have no real birth year information for those children?

More generally I can't follow the logic of disconnecting her from her son, but not her husband. I think the comment I just added from Keats-Rohan also put a different spin on it: it seems to be mainly her name and other details which are doubted. There is no competing theory or disproof. Don't we then keep the attachment but mark things as uncertain?

posted by Andrew Lancaster
edited by Andrew Lancaster
I've removed the 1039 DOB reference. I think it was a typographical error anyway and was supposed to be 1029.
The Keats-Rohan's argument Andrew refers to, that the mother of Hugh, Earl of Chester, must be at least a relative of William 'the Conqueror' if not his half-sister is in more detail in her own article 'The Prosopography of Post-Conquest England: Four Case Studies' published in Medieval Prosopography vol 14 (1) in 1993. It is based on a Bishop of Le Mans (she names him Helinand in Domesday People, but Hildebert in the article) who objected to a proposed marriage of William of Mortain (the son of Robert of Mortain, William the Conqueror's half-brother) to a daughter of Walter of Mayenne. Keats-Rohan seems to think the only way they can be related is via 'Emma'. (Her article is available in JSTOR if you have access to that)

However Peter Stewart in a discussion on gen.medieval, points out that if Hugh was the son of Emma de Conteville (or another half-sister of William the Conqueror) then the marriage of Hugh's son Richard, and Matilda, the daughter of Stephen, Count of Blois and Adela, William the Conqueror's youngest daughter, would be a marriage of second cousins, so well within prohibited consanguinity, but there were no objections to that marriage taking place. He also cites a David Douglas publication from 1944 which states the same thing https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/wgrfjBvtAnw/m/bO_Iss4TKz4J

Also the Addenda volume of The Complete Peerage, vo. 14, p. 170 removes all reference to Emma being the daughter of Herluin de Conteville, and Herleve.

I think these sources represent good grounds for removing Herluin and Herleve as Emma's parents.

posted by John Atkinson
Thanks John. I've also noted this on Hugh's profile so we can aim to have this better explain here and there one day. But I guess this means Emma was also not the wife of Richard?
posted by Andrew Lancaster
Exact birth dates as in day/month/year are almost unknown in this time period (we don't even know for sure the exact year William the Conqueror was born) so unless there is a specific source for 30 Apr 1029 I think it needs to be ignored.

Ancestry is a poor source for pre-1500 profiles anyway.

posted by John Atkinson
Richardson, Royal Ancestry (2013) Vol. 5, p. 488, cites Keats-Rowan (Domesday People 1 (1999) p. 258) saying that the lady is named as Emma by Dugdale (Baronage, Vol. 1, p. 32). But Dugdale doesn't appear to give a name. Neither does Nicolas (1825), Vol. 1, p. 124 or Courthope (1857), p. 104, these being updated summaries of Dugdale.

Cokayne, 1st edn, p. 222 calls her Emma and gives her parentage. He may have taken this from Planche, Vol. 2, p. 19. Planche doesn't say where he got it from.

posted by [Living Horace]

This week's featured connections are American Founders: Emma is 22 degrees from John Hancock, 22 degrees from Francis Dana, 29 degrees from Bernardo de Gálvez, 22 degrees from William Foushee, 21 degrees from Alexander Hamilton, 27 degrees from John Francis Hamtramck, 22 degrees from John Marshall, 21 degrees from George Mason, 24 degrees from Gershom Mendes Seixas, 24 degrees from Robert Morris, 24 degrees from Sybil Ogden and 20 degrees from George Washington on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

C  >  Conteville  |  D  >  d'Avranches  >  Emma (Conteville) d'Avranches