| Thomas Brownell migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 46) Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
Contents |
Thomas Brownell was son of Robert & Mary (Wilson) Brownell who were married 1605 at Sheffield in the West Riding of Yorkshire.
[Sister?:]
Thomas Brownell was apprenticed to his uncle Thomas Wilson:
Thomas Brownell m. Anne Bourne at St. Benets & St. Peters, Paul's Wharf, London March 20,1637/38[4] and came to New England about 1640. (Transcript - Mar.16,1640) (see published registers).
Thomas and Anne Brownell were the first members of the Brownell family to emigrate to America. Most Brownells in the United States and Canada are descended from them. They arrived in New England in 1638, on board the ship Whale. According to the ship's passenger list, they had lived in the London parish of St. Mary Colechurch before making the journey to America.
Thomas and Anne Brownell settled first in Mt. Wollaston (later known as Braintree) Massachusetts, where Thomas was a "planter" or farmer. The first record of him there is in the notebook or legal memoranda of Thomas Lechford. He sold "a house, a garden and six acres of arable land in Braintree" to Deodatus Curtis. The deed is undated, but occurs between entries of 26 May and 11 June 1640.
Sometime between 1639 and 1641, Thomas and Anne moved to the settlement of Portsmouth on Rhode Island (currently known as Aquidneck Island) . Since their first child, Mary, was born in Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1639, and their second child, Sarah, was born in Rhode Island in 1641, the timeframe seems plausible. See below for more about early Rhode Island.
It was among these "heretics" that Thomas and Anne chose to make their permanent home in America. While there are no records which state that the Brownells moved to Portsmouth in 1640, the record of the sale of their house in Braintree in 1640 would make that a logical conclusion. Their remaining eight children are said to have been born in Portsmouth; although, as in Braintree, there are no records to substantiate this.
On the afternoon of 24 September 1664, Thomas Brownell, then age 56, was killed in an accident while on his way from his farm at the northwest end of Rhode Island to Portsmouth. (The Brownells, as was typical of most settlers at that time, probably did not live on their farm. They would also have had a small lot in Portsmouth where they built their home and lived, going to their farm during the day to work.) Thomas left behind a wife, Anne, and nine children, ranging in age from nine to twenty-five years.
According to the testimony of Daniel Lawton, Brownell had stopped at the home of Lawton's father, Thomas Lawton, and upon leaving, invited Daniel, aged 21, to ride with him the rest of the way to Portsmouth. The ride soon became a race when Thomas put his horse to a gallop as they came down the hill near William Wodel's property, located about halfway between the Brownell farm and the town of Portsmouth. The younger man soon caught up with and passed Thomas.
As he continued the race to Portsmouth, Lawton looked back to see where Brownell was. Seeing his riderless horse running towards a swamp he immediately turned his horse around and caught Brownell's horse.
He then retraced his way until he came upon Brownell lying on the ground near a tree. He called out to him, but received no response and so dismounted to check on him. Taking him by the arms and seeing the great amount of blood on the ground, Lawton realized that Thomas Brownell was dead.
The following day a coroner's jury, with Samuel Wilbur as foreman, made an inquest into the accident. Testimony was taken from Daniel Lawton and details about the scene of the accident were given.
The jury's conclusion was that Brownell, riding furiously down the hill, was either thrown against or hit the tree. The broken reins of his bridle had been found next to the body and there was blood and hair sticking to the tree. His skull was broken and his "brains came out," thus causing his death.
(The above narrative is based on the following records found in Rhode Island Historical Society Collections, Vol. XXV [July 1932], "The Lands of Portsmouth, RI, and a Glimpse of Its People," by Edward H. West, pp. 77-78 Internet Archive, as well as in the E.E. Brownell Collection.).
On 9-16-1665, c. 1 year after Thomas’s death, Portsmouth’s Town Council, acting as a Probate Court, awarded his widow Anne a life estate in half of the intestate decedent’s realty (the widow to choose her half) and awarded to eldest son George the remainder interest plus the other half of the realty, said half to vest when he came of age (in about 2 years). [6] This division followed applicable law of intestate succession except that a widow’s right of dower was a life estate in one-third, not one-half, of her husband’s realty. The Council’s Order appointed the widow administrator of Thomas’s estate and imposed on her the obligation to pay legacies of 10 shillings to her two married daughters Mary and Sarah and 20 pounds to each of her 6 other children (see “Children” below) except George when they married (or attained age 21 if male). The Order required Anne to post a bond of 200 pounds to secure her performance of those obligations.
There is no record of any inventory of the estate. However, the amounts of the legacies suggest the estate’s total value was substantial.
The Council’s Order directed the administrator to honor a contract made before Thomas’s death. It also provided for various contingencies, e.g., an heir’s death before that heir’s interest had vested or the widow’s death before her obligations imposed by the Order were satisfied.
The Town Council’s Order proves the identity of the 9 Brownell children named including Susanna who was not found among some genealogical lists of Thomas’s children. The order in which the male heirs were listed in said Order (George, Robert, William, Thomas) suggests the 3 younger sons were born in that order, not the order in which they are listed in some family histories.
Several transcripts of this document (decree of the Town Council of Portsmouth?) are incomplete because of the condition of the original. The document had been folded in half twice and the words at each fold are rather difficult to make out. By enlarging a photocopy of the document, the wording becomes more clear and thus we are able to get a complete and accurate transcript of the document. The original is on file at the Portsmouth Town Hall.
Unsourced birth years range from 1639 to 1655 (Birthdates are unknown - - no birth records. Following are their dates of death. WHAT IS THE SOURCE FOR DATES OF DEATH?
In 1638, Portsmouth was settled by a group of supporters of Anne Hutchinson who had been banished from Boston after excommunication from the Boston Church. With the help of Roger Williams the Island of Aquidneck was purchased from the Indians and a settlement was established at an area called Pocasset. The name was changed to Portsmouth the following year.
The settlements of Newport and Portsmouth were situated on what is commonly called Aquidneck Island today, but it was called Rhode Island in Colonial times. Providence Plantation was the name of the colony founded by Roger Williams in the area now known as the city of Providence. This was adjoined by the settlement of Warwick; hence the plural Providence Plantations.
In 1644, Providence, Portsmouth, and Newport united for their common independence as the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, governed by an elected council and "president".[citation needed]
See also:
Wilbur-403 11:16, 8 February 2017 (EST)
Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: Thomas is 21 degrees from 今上 天皇, 15 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 21 degrees from Dwight Heine, 19 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 17 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 17 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 14 degrees from Sono Osato, 29 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 20 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 22 degrees from Taika Waititi, 20 degrees from Penny Wong and 14 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
B > Brownell > Thomas Brownell
Categories: Puritan Great Migration Project Needs Inline Citations | Puritan Great Migration Project Needs Research | Puritan Great Migration Project Needs Format Improvement | George Brownell Lot, Portsmouth, Rhode Island | Rawmarsh, Yorkshire | Rhode Island, Immigrants from England | Founders and Settlers of Rhode Island | Puritan Great Migration
edited by Charles Clark
1. The narrative states there are no actual birth records of the children, yet specific birth dates are given for most of the children. If the source of the specific birth dates is Ancestry, FamilySearch or the like, the dates of b. should be removed from this profile. That would shift responsibility for the life span of each child down to descendants of each individual child, where it should lie. 2. I believe that Geo. Brownell’s 1910 reference did give Susannah as a ninth child, based on the T.C. record settling the estate of Thomas Brownell. 3. The narrative’s statement “Thus those who made the will and those who approved it would not have made mistakes in that regard” makes no sense since Thomas died intestate. If the point is that the Town Council’s order of male children is probably a true chronological order of their births, it could be stated differently. 4. The functions of a probate court were performed by Town Councils in early Rhode Island. It is common for a probate court to require the executor to post a bond while significant duties remain executory, as in this case. It is not unusual for an estate to take one year to settle, allowing a reasonable time for claims against the estate to be proved (due process is needed before barring claims vs. the estate). 5. The law of primogeniture applied only to real property and all appurtenances thereto (plus peerage titles).. The Town Council’s division did not follow the law of primogeniture nor the law applicable to a widow’s property rights. The widow’s expected remaining life span (perhaps 20 years) together with her right of dower could have made alienating the deceased’s property difficult during the widow’s lifetime. The Council’s division reflected a pragmatic judgment and needs no other commentary. If it is deemed necessary to explain why the eldest son was awarded half of the realty when he came of age and other children got none of the realty, I suggest “The division of realty reflected the Town Council’s judgment re the relative present values of the respective rights of decedent’s widow and his eldest son and financial obligations the Council imposed on the widow.
edited by Charles Clark
On 24 July 1629 Thomas Brownell of Yorkshire, son of Robert Brownell, farmer, of Rawe Marsh, Yorkshire was apprenticed to Thomas Wilson of the Company of Clothworkers for a term of 7 years.
FYI: not everyone on the Trusted List edits the profile; being on the TL is the only way wikitree has to follow changes/updates to a profile. More likely, the state of the current profile came from multiple merges over the years. Perhaps someone else on the Trusted List or one of the PGM project volunteers will take on rewriting this profile.