For access to Josh Baker's full information you must be on Josh's Trusted List. Please login.
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships by comparing test results with Josh or other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Josh Baker:
Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 700 markers, haplogroup R-BY61595, FTDNA kit #B76717, MitoYDNA ID T11728[compare]
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Josh Baker:
Family Tree DNA mtDNA Test Full Sequence, haplogroup H1c3, FTDNA kit #B76717, MitoYDNA ID T11729[compare]
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Josh:
100.00% 100.00%
Josh Baker:
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch A313233[compare], Ancestry member jbbaker28
We have been unable to deliver email to you so we changed your email settings to reduce the number of messages we send. If we can't reach you soon your account will need to be closed.
I know what you mean by brick wall. My current project is documenting down through all gr-grandchildren+spouses of Elijah Kingsbury of Boonville, NY (Kingsbury-290).
I was working on the Amick family, and all I had (or anybody had) was the 1850 census - "Mary F Amick, age 4". Since mother was widowed with 2 girls, I figured it was quite possible she died young. But while documenting the sister Ann (Mrs. Reese) in Kansas, I stumbled up a remote clue that opened up more research (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/64423433). After trying to match that Nora Comer as a niece of Mr. Reese (no luck), I figured I may have found Mary's family. Nora's F-A-G entry actually slowed me down, as it says parents are George Sanders (not Charles), and Martha (not Mary). Eventually finding Charles' obituary, it says he married Fannie Baldwin (that gave me a whaaaat?). But I stayed persistent to identify Charles' wife/Nora's mother and finally figured out that Fanny Amie was the same person.
Somehow I had missed the "Fannie Amick" in the Missouri marriage records early on. I guess since it wasn't "Mary F.", I went right past it.
FYI - I have merged them on FamilySearch, so others can find them that way as well.
We have been unable to deliver email to you so we changed your email settings to reduce the number of messages we send. If we can't reach you soon your account will need to be closed.
Please 1.) click this link now to let us know you received this message and 2.) make sure that you can receive email at the email address on your profile. See the help page for more information.
Thank you!
I know what you mean by brick wall. My current project is documenting down through all gr-grandchildren+spouses of Elijah Kingsbury of Boonville, NY (Kingsbury-290).
I was working on the Amick family, and all I had (or anybody had) was the 1850 census - "Mary F Amick, age 4". Since mother was widowed with 2 girls, I figured it was quite possible she died young. But while documenting the sister Ann (Mrs. Reese) in Kansas, I stumbled up a remote clue that opened up more research (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/64423433). After trying to match that Nora Comer as a niece of Mr. Reese (no luck), I figured I may have found Mary's family. Nora's F-A-G entry actually slowed me down, as it says parents are George Sanders (not Charles), and Martha (not Mary). Eventually finding Charles' obituary, it says he married Fannie Baldwin (that gave me a whaaaat?). But I stayed persistent to identify Charles' wife/Nora's mother and finally figured out that Fanny Amie was the same person.
Somehow I had missed the "Fannie Amick" in the Missouri marriage records early on. I guess since it wasn't "Mary F.", I went right past it.
FYI - I have merged them on FamilySearch, so others can find them that way as well.