Thomas Latham (abt. 1396 - 1455)

I was reading Omerod as well, it's a little confusing to read (the way that it is). And I see Robert Lathom ("; and Parnel Daniell, married Robert Lathom of Congleton, 4 Hen. vii. 1489").

It looks to be reading that 1st Katherine (Daniell) married a Rodger Millington.. The second line of family has another Thomas (who marries a Katharine de Middleton (Milneton?). Is Ormerod proposing three lines of Thomases?

Ormerod

but the dates aren't right. 6 Hen VI is 1427-8, 1 Ric III is 1483-5, 14 Hen VII is 1498-9.

Perhaps Henry VI should be Hen VII - 6 Hen VII would be 1490-1. That would be consistent with the date of the Lathom-Daniel marriage, given here as 4 Hen VII (1488-9): Vol. 1, p. 366.

Link 1 (Royal Collection Trust) [1] Link 2 (same book, via google books; viewable) [2] Another source: Portfolio of Fragments Relative to the History and Antiquities, Topography and Genealogies of the County Palatine and Duchy of Lancaster (page 242 shows) "PEDIGREE OF THE FAMILY OF LATHAM, WILL BE FOUND IN THE HARLEIAN MSS. M.B. Nos. 1549 & 6159; TESTIFIED AS TRUE By wV. FLOWER, NORROY KING-OF-ARMS, 6th APRIL 1578, 20 ELIZ.; WITH ADDITIONS FROM “..." THIS MARK."

There is also other information on the family (and cites sources throughout).

Reviewing a questionable Magna Carta and Royal line from Latham-33 to this Latham-58 and back to Lathom-47 and on to Magna Carta surety barons and other royal lines. Thomas was born 56 years after his 'father' Latham-37's death.

Please help us remove dubious connections like this, which are obviously wrong.

Thanks