Heidi Hafeken
Privacy Level: Private (Red)

Heidi Hafeken

Honor Code Signatory
Signed 3 Apr 2013 | 468 contributions | 7 thank-yous | 64 connections
Following DE HUNGERFORD LISLE ROOD
Wiki Genealogist Honor Code Signatory August 2011 Club 100
[view badges]
Ms. Heidi A. Hafeken
Born 1960s.
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Heidi Hafeken private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 789 times.

Only the Trusted List can access the following:
  • Heidi's formal name
  • full middle name (A.)
  • e-mail address
  • exact birthdate
  • birth location
  • images (1)
  • biography
  • family tree
  • father's name
  • mother's name
For access to Heidi Hafeken's full information you must be on Heidi's Trusted List. Please login.


Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile. If you prefer to keep it private, send a private message to the profile manager. private message
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Felch-7 Robin (Felch) Wedertz
Greetings. This profile has been identified by the Database Errors Project as having an event take place in the future! Please help us keep WikiTree accurate, and input a correct date. Even if it's an estimate or guess! Thank you.
posted by Robin (Felch) Wedertz
Hill-11959 S (Hill) Willson
Hi Heidi,

Ebenezer Mason-1523 is in my direct family line. Would you please add me to his trusted list so that I can keep informed of updates to his profile?

Thank you, Sharon

posted by S (Hill) Willson
Hafeken-1 Heidi Hafeken
I only found this again bc I ran a google of myself. I ceased using wikitree years ago so I'm not updating anything here. Good luck with your research.
posted by Heidi Hafeken
Hafeken-1 Heidi Hafeken
I see some misunderstanding of how to list dates recorded in colonial records before 9/1752(under the Julian calendar). One lists the ORIGINALLY RECORDED DATE BUT MAY ADD A SLASH FOR THE ADJUSTED DATE - ONE NEVER uses only the 'adjusted' date. I choose to use the originally recorded date - changing the date to months later to "adapt" to the calendar change is bad genealogical practice since those who know how the dating works are aware that the date is the originally recorded date. To do otherwise calls our research into question and causes unnecessary confusion.
posted by Heidi Hafeken
[Living McCann]
357 contributions!?! What a great start!

Crystal - WikiTree Community Assistant

posted by [Living McCann]

H  >  Hafeken  >  Heidi Hafeken