- Profile
- Images
Surnames/tags: Van Couwenhoven Van Kouwenhoven Gerritsz
Posted for discussion. Received via e-mail March 23, 2014:
The LNAB of http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Van_Couwenhoven-19 is incorrect. As I have said / stated 'van Kouwenhoven / Van Couwenhoven' as with many Dutch surnames did not include the suffixes and placenames until later in the 17th and 18th centuries. The https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1942-33029-18410-76?cc (entry for marriage - left corner at the top) clearly indicates that the incorporation of the 'from' / 'of' followed by placename did only become a formal part of the surname until after registration for disembarkation / registration in the colonies.
This LNAB should be 'Gerritsz', the AKA field having the Van Kouwenhoven / van Couwenhoven. This should be the leading thought when dealing with the LNAB's during this transition period.
A few things should be understood:
1) The patronymic system of noting down baptisms for centuries (when people started noting down births / baptisms - this varies from region to region and town to town) DIT NOT include Van / Van der / Van den / De / Du in the LNAB until the 17th and 18th centuries. People did however call someone Wolftert (first name) and if neccesary (Gerritsz) to indicate that Gerrit was the father and only then if neccesary 'of Amersfoort' or 'from [the] Couwenhoven' to indicate where that specific person was from. It was not part of the LNAB, but was often written down in registers to make an indicatory note (such as 'from Amersfoort' or 'vroom' - devout).
2) It is only when the global colonisation and trading gets going and people are being registered in ports of entry that they get noted down as for example Wolfert Gerritsz from Kouwenhoven. This is important but it still does not mean that it is part of the LNAB.
3) In general 1 generation later the children MIGHT get baptised with LNAB such as Jacob Wolphertsen Van couwenhoven, but it is still (in this specific case) unlikely because this child was born in Holland and not the new colony. Even if born in the first few years of (a) new colony the patronymic system was still in full use - meaning the whole Van Kouwenhoven was intended as an explanatory addendum.
4) Next: As a rule the following generation gets the full name where the patronymic convention gets slightly changed where the previous LNAB would become the second name, and the VanCouwenhoven (the explanatory addendum with all its' 'mistakes' and spelling variations) is noted down as the LNAB.
5) After the English takeover the Dutch (as you well know yourself) gets Anglised. Brouwer becomes Brower becomes Bower etc. Sometimes the trade / occupation that a person had became the surname (in this case 'Brewer' = 'Brouwer'). In England this was a tradition much longer history - Baker, Smith, Potter etc.
6) In Europe is was only after Napoleon (1812) that taking a proper (full) surname became obligatory which saw the end of the patronymic system as it was still used here in Europe. In the colonies this process had already taken place because of the masses of migrants and settlers from all over Europe.
I apologise for not having been quicker to explain this in the G2G commentary.
Sincerely, Philip
See my previous post on -19: even this source does not include the V.. K..... in the LNAB (the childrens' name are in bold):
Source (seen March 22, 2014): http://www.conovergenealogy.com/Pages/newinfor.htm
From NYGBR "[...] This is the last document pertaining to Wolfert Gerritse that has been discovered in the archives of Amersfoort.
on Jun 11, 1623. He was a baker and then later a bleacher (bleaching laundry on a grassfield in the sun) before 1624. He immigrated between 1624 and 1625 to New Amsterdam, Kings Co. Long Island, NY. He and Neeltgen Jacobsdochter immigrated in Jun , 1625 to New Netherlands; or July 1625, with his wife and family on a ship of the Dutch West India Company which saled in the expedidition that was comprsed of the ships Mackerel, Horse, Cow and Sheep. Wolfert returned to the Netherlands in 1629. He retruned from the Netherlands on board "De Endracht" (the Unity) on May 24, 1630. There exists a letter from Kiiaen van Rensselaer to Wolfert which I have to get from sources. At this time Wolfert was in the Netherlands and the letter had to do with terminating Wolfert's contract with van Rensselaer and mentions that Wolferts wife was unhappy living in New Netherlands. In the letter van Rensselaer states he would not want someone who was not happy working for him to remain in his employ under the circumstances. It was a friendly letter. According to the source there are several letters fo Wolfert from Van Rensselaer. The letter above was read over the phone to me and I have yet to recieve the exact copy and don't take short hand in 1632. He purchased "Keskateuw" located on Long Island from the Indians. Here was established the first kown white settlement on Long Island. Wolphert called his "plantation" Achterveldt, shown on the Manatu Map of New Netherlands as farm No. 36 near the Indian long house to the Kestachau tribe. Wolphert's house surrounded by palisades, was the focal pont of the village of New Amersfoort, later called Flatlands on Jun 30, 1636. He got "Smal Civil Rights" on Apr 18, 1657. Wolfert Gerritsen Van Couwenhoven was named in a suit filed by Frans Jansen regardin a dispute ofver a contract in which Jansen was to buy land from Wofert. This was the first time the name Van Couwenhoven was mentioned in referenc to Wolfert on Oct 20, 1661.
Children of Wolphert Gerretse2 Van Kouwenhoven and Neeltgen Jacobsdochter were as follows:
4. i. Gerret Wolfersen, born circa 1610 at Amersfoort, Ultrecht, Netherlands; married Aeltje Cornelis Cool.
5. ii. Pieter Wolphertse, born circa 1614 at Amersfoort, Netherlands; married Hester Daws; married Aeltje Sibrants; married Josynthe Thomas.
6. iii. Jacob Wolphertse, born 1615 at Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands; married Hester Jansen; married Magdaleentje Jacobs Van Amsterdam. Generation Three
4. Gerret Wolfersen3 Van Kouwenhoven (Wolphert2, Gerritt1 Couwenhoven) was born circa 1610 at Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands. He married Aeltje Cornelis Cool, daughter of Cornelius Lambertse Cool and (Unknown) (Unknown), circa 1635 at Flatlands, Long Island, NY. He died circa 1648 at Flatlands, Long Island, NY; Was probably after patent issued [...]."
Memories: 1
- Login to edit this profile and add images.
- Private Messages: Contact the Profile Managers privately: Steven Mix and Kimball Everingham. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
- Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)
The marriage record is not from the (second) marriage with Neeltgen Jacobsdr but it was from the first marriage with Aeltgen Jansdr, so I corrected her name.
I added a copy a while ago to their profiles, which perhaps is more easy to read ?
Many people or genealogies have him with just one wife and with the patronymics of both, so one wife named Neeltgen Jacob Jans or something, but in fact there were two seperate wifes, first Aeltgen Jans and second Neeltgen Jacobs. We still are looking for the marriage record of Wolphert and Neeltgen, they are mentioned in a lot of deeds but so far still no marriage record.
Greets, Bea
http://www.hetutrechtsarchief.nl/beeld/Atlantis/349/_500/29349.jpg
part 1: http://www.historischekringhoogland.nl/pagina92.html part 2: http://www.historischekringhoogland.nl/pagina96.html
In the case of this family line, it seems that in just 100 years the patronymic LNAB has been completely abandoned.
All the children of Neeltje gets the surname Vanderbilt (originally meant to indicate the town of 'De Bilt' in the Netherlands where they came from, now a full LNAB in own right).
Lena, Neeltje's sister, marries Benjamin Van Cleef. Once again, all her children has as LNAB Van Cleef.
In both cases with a capital V.
In the Netherlands (Europe) and in South Africa the convention would dictate lower cases if following a first name and if necessary spaces between the 'tussenvoegsels'; if speaking of a family in a generic genealogical sense, it would be with a capital.
For example: the Van der Walt-family. But I write my name as: Philip Johan van der Walt.