| Thomas Grover migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
Contents |
Thomas Grover was mostly likely born in Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England and baptized on 26 Nov 1615, the son of Lazarus Grover and Godsgrace King.[1] What little direct evidence there is and all secondary, acceptable derivative works and circumstantial evidence comes to this conclusion (See Research Notes for discussion of disputed origins). Therefore, they should be listed as his parents BUT tagged as "uncertain" until further evidence is obtained.
Thomas, from Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England, is recorded as arriving in Charlestown between 1620 and 1650.[2] Unfortunately, the ship and arrival date are not known. It has been written that Thomas was part of John Winthrop's fleet of 11 ships that sailed from England and landed in Salem, Massachusetts on 12 Jun 1630 and that Thomas took part in the founding of the first church in Charlestown in 1632.[3][4] This may be true but no corroborating source for this arrival has been found and could just be political puffery for the biography of his 5x grandson, LaFayette Grover, the 4th governor of Oregon. Regardless, by 1630, Salem could not feed or shelter an additional 700 to 800 colonists so on 17 Jun 1630 they left for Charlestown. On the opposite side of the Charles River, they would lay the foundation of Boston.[5][6]
The first available record of Thomas in Charlestown was in 1638, when he is mentioned in a land transaction with William Frothingale for 1 cow common and a quarter. He would have been about 23 years of age.[7] (Note: John Greene became Town Clerk in 1645-6 and made numerous interlineations for 1638 land records to clarify the specific points of the legal contracts. There had been a hiatus of about 11 years of recording the town proceedings before the time John Greene became the town clerk.) Thomas was a "planter" (farmer) and early land holdings in Boston and Charlestown show he was a property owner in 1640.[8]
Thomas married Elizabeth (some say maiden name is Smith) about 1640. They had nine children, three of whom died in the epidemic of 1674:[8]
Grace died before Thomas wrote his Will. Andrew, Elizabeth and John died during the epidemic of 1674. Simon, Mathew and Stephen were not named in their father's Will but did receive their portion of the farm land as they came of age and had other dealings with their brothers (See discussion under Will and Research Notes).
In August 1675 the Constable of Malden (unknown if at this time it was Philip Atwood, the second husband of Elizabeth, who was a Constable) was ordered to impress “ten able horses, well shod, with bridles and saddles ... fit for the Country’s service.” Those who furnished horses include Thomas' sons Thomas, Simon and Stephen Grover.[19]
By 1649, Malden (also known as the "Mystic side" of the Malden river) incorporates as a separate town from Charlestown and land owned, where Thomas settled, is mentioned on 10 Dec 1649 (10 day 10 month 1649) bounding, to the southwest, the sale of 5 acres from Ralph Hall to William Luddingtonin. On 12 Jun 1652 (12 day 4 month 1652) land owned by Thomas is mentioned bounding, to the east, land being sold by William Harris to a carpenter, John Greenland and in 1657 land owned by Thomas is bounding, to the north, 10 acres sold by Edward Carrinton to Job Land.[7]
Early records of Charlestown show Thomas Grover's home was located where the present streets of Bow, Main, and Prescott adjoin, in the "old" Charlestown section (near the Navy Yard) and by the time of his death an inventory of his estate showed he owned 45 acres of land.[8]
Thomas died 8 Oct 1661 at Malden, Massachusetts.[10][16] Where he was buried is unknown. On 17 Dec 1661 the inventory of his estate was filed by his widow Elizabeth and eldest son Lazarus who were appointed administrators.[8][16]
The filing shows a value of 157 Pounds after 34 Pounds of debt were paid.[8][20]
Wife's Remarriage
On 7 Apr 1675, Thomas' widow Elizabeth married Philip Atwood, a "planter" and Constable of Malden.[21] Upon her remarriage, Lazarus was named sole administrator of his father's estate which was still open after 14 years. He was also made the "guardian of his minor brothers" to assure their receiving their full shares.[8] The very month of her second marriage, Elizabeth and her son Lazarus' family along with new husband Philip and other families moved west to a new settlement now known as Worcester County. Within three months the families returned to Malden due to skirmishes with the Native Americans and there Elizabeth died in October 1676.[22]
Will and Estate
While the location of the will of Thomas Grover is uncertain, the most recent information, based on his Will, states that sons Lazarus, Thomas, Andrew, and John and daughter Elizabeth are named in the document. Simon, Matthew and Stephen are not named. Why Thomas did not name these three additional children is unknown. They were minors (roughly aged 7, 6 and 3, respectively) but so was John (about 5), who was named on the Will. English civil law had no requirement to endow all of the children in the Will. Regardless, through the administration of the Will by Lazarus, these three sons, Simon, Matthew and Stephen received a share of the 45 acre farm land. It appears that Thomas' estate was divided into nine, 5 acre shares and distributed to each child, except Lazarus, who received a double portion as the eldest child. Elizabeth, the widow, received the dwelling house with all furnishings and household goods. Grace had died in 1658, before her father. Andrew, Elizabeth, and John died in the epidemic of 1674 and the inventories of their estates each showed a 5 acre parcel of property, probably from their father's estate.[8]
It is claimed by almost all books (public and private), genealogist, family trees and websites that Thomas Grover the immigrant to Charlestown/Malden, Massachusetts is the Thomas Grover who was baptized 26 Nov 1615 at Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England and a son of Lazarus Grover and Godsgrace King.
It is nearly impossible to find many primary, first hand records for Thomas Grover. During the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 nearly all the Charlestown records were lost to antiquity when almost half the town burnt down, ignited by British cannon fire (flaming hot shot).
What little direct evidence that is available is as follows:
1) Thomas Grover, of Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England was baptized on 26 Nov 1615.[1]
2) Thomas Grover, of Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England, arrived in Charlestown between 1620 and 1650.[2]
3) Thomas Grover was recorded in Charlestown by 1638.[7]
While thin, this is the first piece of evidence that shows a direct line of Thomas Grover of Chesham to Charlestown.
This then leads to the use of acceptable secondary evidence. This includes well referenced books such as the 1967 seminal work by Joel Grover, “Ancestry and genealogy of our Thomas Grover family : descendants of Thomas Grover and Elizabeth of Chesham, Bucks., Eng., 1514-1580” (1967) in 2 volumes,[8][23] and Mary Ferris’ “Dawes-Gates Ancestral Lines" (1943).[12] Of these two, Grover is the most reliable and should be considered the Gold Standard for Grover family history. It not only builds upon his previous work in 1960[24] and that of Ferris but also includes an extensive list of pertinent Deeds, Wills, Probates and a Bibliography of 185 sources including paid research by professional genealogist and Genealogical Societies. Of course, no work is without error and all should be cross referenced and verified when possible. There are a few cases where work done by professional genealogists for Grover, whether looking at microfilm in England or America, has to be taken at face value. The evidence from Grover (1967) displays a direct line from Thomas Grover of Chesham to Charlestown. Additional well researched books include "Topographical Dictionary of 2885 English Emigrants to New England, 1620-1650"[2] by Charles Edward Banks and "The Great Migration",[25] by Robert Anderson.
Most other acceptable works and indexes from Genealogical Societies, such as The Genealogist, professional genealogist and respected authorities such as Torrey's Marriage Index, Sanborn’s Third Supplement are derivative from Grover, Ferris or direct evidence. For example, Sanborn's Third Supplement not only has marriages but birth and death dates that reference The Great Migration or an article from The Genealogist[26] but The Genealogist article will then reference back to Grover, Ferris or Chesham parish registers. The Genealogist article also concludes a direct line from Thomas Grover of Chesham to Charlestown.
Finally, there is circumstantial evidence that ties Thomas of Chesham with Thomas of Charlestown/Malden, Massachusetts by the use of family names. All the names of his children are names used by his ancestors in Chesham and Aldenham, England. Lazarus was the name of the father of Thomas of Chesham, and is the name of Thomas of Charlestown's firstborn son. The other names of his children are the same as the brothers and sisters of Thomas of Chesham and frequently used by aunts, uncles and grandparents.
When all available evidence, direct, secondary, derivative and circumstantial is taken together as a whole, this Thomas Grover is most likely the Thomas Grover, of Chesham, son of Lazarus and Godsgrace. Below is additional research dealing with loose ends and other areas of concern.
According to Banks, a Thomas Grover from Aldenham, Hertsfordshire, England also came to Charlestown.[2] Who is this Thomas? It is known that Lazarus and Godsgrace, the parents of Thomas born in Chesham, moved to Aldenham (which is located about 9 or 10 miles east southeast of Chesham) between Feb 1619[27] and Feb 1620.[28] Thomas would have been about 4 or 5 years old at the time. The only recorded birth of a Thomas Grover around this time period in Aldenham wasn't until 1635 and much too young to be the Thomas that immigrated to Charlestown and married Elizabeth about 1640. Finally, the only other Thomas Grover known to have lived, married or died in Charlestown/Malden was his second son. The most logical explanation is a double accounting of the same Thomas Grover that moved with his parents from Chesham to Aldenham.
One of the biggest area of confusion and error for researches over the past century are the different wives named Elizabeth. This causes their birth and death dates to be confused with the wrong spouse. What makes matters worse is that most, if not all, of their maiden names are not know and one person, Philip Atwood, had 3 wives two of which were named Elizabeth. The first Elizabeth being the widow of Thomas Grover. For example, this caused respected Indexes like Torrey's and Sanborn to have the death date of the wife of Thomas as 1688 on page 121 and as 1676 on page 10 when she remarried Philip Atwood all within the same index based on two different sources. Here is a list of the pertinent names with the best-known information.
1) Elizabeth (some say Smith), b. abt. 1618 in England, d. Oct 1676, Malden, Mass[22] married (1) Thomas Grover abt 1640, (2) Philip Atwood on 7 Apr 1675
2) Elizabeth (maiden unknown), d. 3 Apr 1688[22] married as 3rd wife of Philip Atwood. aft 1676 (possible 1678?)
3) Elizabeth (maiden unknown), b. abt. 1606 in England, d. Nov 1688 “80 yrs”,[23] Boston (Rumney-Marsh), Mass married John Grover (b. abt 1606, d. Dec 1686) abt 1634-35 in England
4) Elizabeth (maiden unknown), d. 22 Feb 1688,[10] married (abt 1676/bef 1678) as 2nd wife of Lazarus Grover, son of this Thomas Grover
The most recent research shows that Ferris was mistaken in implying that "Oulde Goodwife Grover" was "highly probably" the mother of Thomas. There was zero evidence of Thomas' mother coming to America for Ferris to make this claim. To the contrary, documentation shows the identity of "Oulde Goodwife Grover" as the wife of Thomas Grover. The confusion occurs with the Charlestown church records and the wives named Elizabeth as discussed earlier. The Elizabeth admitted to the church on 10 Sep 1644 was the wife of "a" John Grover, who was an inhabitant of Charlestown since 1640,[13][29] not the wife of Thomas Grover. In "The Genealogies and Estates of Charlestown" Elizabeth, the wife of Thomas, is listed as marrying (1) Thomas and (2) Philip Atwood, then called "Oulde Goodwife Grover" admitted to the church on 30 Nov 1643.[13][29] Who the John Grover and his wife Elizabeth (maiden name unknown) are, listed in "The Genealogies and Estates of Charlestown", requires further research.
On 29 May 1675, Mathew Grover sold a small piece of property to John Greenland Jr.[8] This property was most likely the land his father, Thomas, owned that bounded, to the east, land originally purchased on 12 Jun 1652 by John Greenland.[7] The deed for this land bears the signature of Mathew and his older brother Lazarus (by mark).[8] As the eldest son, Lazarus was then the sole administrator of his father's estate, and "guardian of his minor brothers." It appears that Mathew was still a minor at the date of the sale of this small piece of property and it was necessary to have Lazarus approve the transaction and sign the document with him to make it legal, though the deed does not plainly show this. Lazarus evidently signed it as administrator of his father's estate and this is accepted as adequate proof that Mathew was one of the "minor brothers" (along with Simon and Stephen) of Lazarus and thus a son of Thomas Grover and Elizabeth. The description of the property bounds shows that this piece of property adjoined other lands of "Thomas Grover, deceased", and thus indicates it may possibly have come to Mathew directly from his father, or from his father's estate, or possibly from the estates of the two brothers (John and Andrew), and/or sister Elizabeth, who had died just the preceding year of 1674.
Simon and Stephen were minors, as was Matthew, at the time Thomas wrote his Will. Thomas is the only possible (known) father of these two young boys, according to their apparent ages (from approximated birth dates, as judged from marriage and death records). The only other possible Grover of age at that time living in the area was a John Grover (mentioned earlier) and his wife Elizabeth. However, their children were named John, Elizabeth and Lydia.[8][13]
Simon and Stephen were frequently in league with their brothers Lazarus and Thomas. In 1674, the Quansigamond Plantation, which later became the city of Worcester, was purchased from the local Nipmuc Indians. On 27 May 1674 a group of men from Maiden, Charlestown, Boston and Watertown, petitioned the General Court at Boston, for additional farm lands. Simon and Stephen, with their brothers Lazarus and Thomas where among those, including their mother's second husband Philip Atwood, whose petition was granted. In Apr 1675 the land was surveyed into lots ranging in size from 25 to 100 acres.[8][12][30] They were driven out during the King Philip's War of 1675-76 which comprised of numerous Indian tribes including the Wampanoag, Nipmuc, and Naragansett.
See also:
Featured Eurovision connections: Thomas is 30 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 23 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 24 degrees from Corry Brokken, 17 degrees from Céline Dion, 23 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 25 degrees from France Gall, 26 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 25 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 19 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 30 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 28 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 16 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
I'm uncertain about the 2nd point in the research notes: "Thomas Grover, of Chesham, Buckinghamshire, England, arrived in Charlestown between 1620 and 1650" citing Topographical Dictionary. I believe the Topographical Dictionary is the publication that was done posthumously from Banks' manuscript. and what were often just notes of names he found in England that matched what was known about New England immigrants and not necessarily intended by him to be conclusively connected (although that's not at all apparent in the publication). Let me look that up.
I think it's worth reviewing the comments in the profile related to what's presented in the Topographical Dictionary. I think what appears in the Dictionary are just notes of English records of interest, and not actual proof of connection between a location in England and a specific New England immigrant.
I do think that the naming evidence shouldn't be ignored. Son Lazarus is potentially named after his paternal grandfather, and it's a very unusual name. That certainly suggests that this is likely the right family line. If we're "following Anderson," my guess is that he would say something like: "it's likely, but more evidence would be welcome." It could be the correct family of Grovers, but not the right branch (or twig). (The recent issue of NEHGR includes a case study that addresses using naming patterns, and unusual names: "The English Origins and Family of Brothers William1 French and John1 French of Cambridge, Massachusetts). As part of their evidence they included the frequency and locations of the name "Jacob" occurring in record searches for "French" in the time period).
One question I also didn't see specifically addressed is if there was a search for later records in England for Thomas Grover, and whether Lazarus his father left a will.
It would be interesting to get some feedback from some members of the England Project on this.
Edited to add: You've done excellent job reworking this profile. And I'm not really taking a position one way or the other. Just making sure that if we attach parents that we are being thorough in making the case.
Also adding there is an open g2g on the question of parents: https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/1389044/the-parents-of-thomas-grover-1615-1661
edited by M Cole
Thank you for supporting WikiTree and for your work on this profile.
FYI -- Noting that I am thrown by Banks claim, as I understand the research notes, that there is/is another man of the name early of Charlestown. Banks' work is appreciated by all of us, but in my experience, he could be liberal in his interpretation of probabilities and was often followed by others.
Have any records been discovered about Thomas at New England that would provide his age?
Narrative includes statement, "Additional well researched books include ...and "The Great Migration", by Robert Anderson." Might you have a publication date and page number for the Anderson article where we might find relevant information?
I agree presumably you and with M. Cole that the name Lazarus is a great lead. I'm just not familiar enough with the work that was done to survey English records about, in her words, the branches and twigs.
Thank you again for supporting WikiTree. --Gene
Thanks for the deep dive and all the excellent sourcing.
One thing that comes to mind is that Thomas Grover is not in Great Migration Directory, which suggests that there isn't a record of him in New England through May 1641. Just glancing at the land transaction in the Charlestown records [currently citation # 6], it looks like the reference to Thomas Grover isn't part of the original record from 1638, but a note added later by John Greene who was town clerk starting in 1645-6. See introduction.
I'm not sure whether that changes the meaning, but Just something to look at.
If you're confident that his arrival was during the Great Migration, you should consider submitting the documentation to the GM Study Project. From the Introduction to the Directory: "If, however, you believe you have reliable documentation for a Great Migration immigrant not included in this volume, please let us know by emailing [email address removed] as we will be collecting additions and corrections for future publication."
I've seen this done before. The Project did not accept the suggested new immigrant but did provide an enlightening answer that helped us better interpret the document in question.
There was a hiatus of about 11 years of recording the town proceedings before the time John Greene became the town clerk in 1645-6. So not all of the records made in 1638 may have been entered. It may be possible that the entries by Greene were to back fill some of the transactions that occurred during the 11 year hiatus that may not have been recorded. If not, why would Greene make an entry for 1638 when he was the clerk in 1645? Could he had made that entries in 1638 just not in his capacity as clerk? It is interesting.
edited by John Sigh Jr.
Jen
(Not answering for Jen, just pointing to the cats)