William Field, b. probably in Ardsley, England; m. Mrs. Jane (Sotwell) Burdett. William Field, executor of his mother's will. He married Jane, dau. of Rev. John Sotwell, and widow of George Burdett, of Carhead, then described of Thurnscoe. Rev. John was vicar of Peniston. Mrs. Jane Field was buried Oct. 21, 1623, in the parish of Silkstone. He d. in 1623. Res. Thurnscoe, England.
The will of Jane, widow of John Field, is dated July 17, 1609, and she was buried at East Ardsley, Aug. 3, 1609. They had nine children — Richard, born in 1562; Matthew, born in 1563; Christopher, born in 1565; John, born in 1568; 'William, born in 1570'; Thomas, born in 1572; James, born in 1574; Martin, born in 1577; Ann, born in 1580. The oldest, Richard, was disinherited by his father. Matthew, lord of the manor of Thumscoe, named in his mother's will, died June 2, 1631. Letters of administration granted to his son, Matthew, Aug. 4, 1631. Christopher not named in his mother's will. John not named in his mother's will. 'William of Thumscoe, executor of his mother's will'. Thomas named in his mother's will, in which she calls him her third son. James, Martin, or Ann are not named in their mother's will. By their not being named, Mr. Osgood Field thinks they were not living, which is a matter of doubt, as they may have espoused the Puritan cause and left England.
In his book, Sweet Lands of Liberty, (2004), William S. Field states, "The astronomer's son, John, purportedly the father of Zechariah the emigrant and alleged ancestor of David Dudley Field, and Marshall Field, along with his brother Christopher, died young and so could not have been Zechariah's father." His conclusions are based in part on a letter to the NEHGR, vol. 22 pp. 166-173 by Osgood Field which states in part, "As for the assertion...that John Field, the son of the astronmer, had a son named Zechariah, and that William and John Field (1616-1686), the early settlers of Rhode Island, were sons of William (1556-1623) and grandsons of the astronomer, they are not entitled to the slightest credence, not being supported by a shadow of evidence." Osgood Field could not find any children for William (1556-1623) in English records.[1]. DNA matches among the descendants will determine if the relationships are true, see http://www.worldfamilies.net/surnames/fields.
Featured German connections: William is 19 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 22 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 25 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 20 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 21 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 22 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 24 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 16 degrees from Alexander Mack, 34 degrees from Carl Miele, 16 degrees from Nathan Rothschild and 18 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
edited by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
It looks as though William had a son John, but the son was born in 1568, much to early to be this John.
Osgood Field could not find any children for William (1556-1623) in English records.[1]
Is this the same man as William Field (abt. 1570 - 1623)?
And is Osgood FIELD saying that John FIELD (1616-1686) of Providence, RI is not the grandson of the astronomer?