| Magna Carta Surety Baron Descendant (see text). Join: Magna Carta Project Discuss: magna_carta |
Contents |
Eve (or Eva) de Clavering was born between 1295 and 1305, daughter of Sir John FitzRobert de Clavering, 2nd Baron Clavering and Hawise de Tiptoft (or Tiptot).[1] She was age 40 and more in 1345.[2]
Eve married (1) about 1305 Thomas de Audley, 7th Lord Audley, son of Sir Nicholas de Audley and Katherine Giffard, no issue.[2]
Eve married (2) before 2 December 1308 Sir Thomas de Ufford, son of Sir Robert (Peyton) de Ufford, Justiciar of Ireland and Joan,[2]
Eve married (3) before 1 November 1319 Sir James de Audley[3], son of Sir Hugh de Audley, Lord Audley and Iseult le Rous.[2]
Eve married (4) in 1335 Sir Robert de Benhale, no issue.[2]
She died September 20, 1369[4] and was buried at Langley Abbey, Norfolk, with her four husbands.[2]
The distribution of Eve's property was ordered in a writ of precipmus on 10 July 1371 and an inquisition was taken at Stafford on 6 August 1371, which included "Audelegh. The manor and Endon. A third part of the manor" and "both the above she held for life in dower of James de Audelegh, lord of Heeleye, as of the castle and manor of Alveton, by service of a pair of gilt spurs at Michaelmas, by endowment of Thomas de Audelegh, her late husband, the reversion after her death belonging to the said James as kinsman and heir of Thomas. The castle and manor of Alveton are assigned in dower to Joan late the wife of Thomas de Fournyvall ... the said James has had possession of the manor and third part ever since her death as heir of the said Thomas."[4]
1334 seal of Eve:[5]
Cokayne's Complete Peerage suggests that Eve lived with, but did not marry, James de Audley, "possibly owing to some difficulty in obtaining a dispensation, or to avoid the fine which she would have had to pay on marriage".[6]
In a discussion in soc.genealogy.medieval, started in April 2007, Douglas Richardson gave evidence for his conclusion that they did in fact marry.[7] Among the sources which he gave as evidence for this marriage were:
There is also a settlement of the manor of Stratton, Oxfordshire in 1330 by James de Audley and his wife Eve. The Victoria County History for Oxfordshire, which refers to this, goes on to say that Eve was James's mistress rather than his wife, and that James died without legitimate issue, but the only source given for this statement is Cokayne's Complete Peerage. The manor of Stratton did, though, pass not to James's sons by Eve but to his younger brother Hugh Audley, and that might appear to cast doubt on whether the sons were legitimate.[14]
In the soc.medieval.genealogy discussion, Rosie Bevan referred to two documents which might also cast doubt on the legality of Eve's marriage to James de Audeley.[15] By a deed of 1 November 1319 James de Audley leased a third of the manor of Cold Norton, Staffordshire, which he "ad du donn dame Eve Doufford a terme de la vie la dite dame Eve" ["acquired by the gift of lady Eve Doufford for the term of life of the said lady Eve"], with Eve confirming the deed on 11 November 1319.[16] Rosie Bevan stated that this demonstrates that James had acquired this property by gift of Eve, not by his rights as her husband: she suggested that if they were legally married there would have been no need for Eve to give separate confirmation. Eve is referred to as "Doufford" (de Ufford) not "de Audley".
In a 1909 article, Josiah Wedgwood referred to the 11 November 1319 document and commented, "It will be noticed that Sir James and Eve do not speak of each other as husband and wife, but that they have some mutual interests in each others' lives." He went on, "Eve de Clavering was a wealthy heiress and could not marry without paying a large fine. She possibly preferred an illegitimate match." But the document is sealed by Eve with a seal containing the arms of both Ufford and Audley, which may point to her being formally married to James de Audley.[17]
Rosie Bevan also said that, because of Eve's previous marriage to Thomas de Audley, Eve and James would have needed a papal dispensation for their marriage and suggested that they lacked the resources and influence to have gone to the trouble and expense of seeking one, with no guarantee of success. But, given that Eve was a wealthy heiress, as mentioned by Josiah Wedgwood, this surmise may be questionable. There is also a question about whether a dispensation would have been needed. Eve appears to have been married to Thomas in fairly early childhood; he died in 1307, when she was probably under 12, and possibly some years younger than that, so the marriage was almost certainly not consummated: the Church may well not have regarded it as confirmed in canon law, thus leaving her free to marry James.
The Dictionary of National Biography entry for Eve's son James de Audley describes him as son of Eve and James. It does not say explicitly that Eve and James were married - but it does not normally spell out that parents were married.[18] The same is true of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry for Eve's son James de Audley.[19] Neither suggests that her son James was illegitimate.
Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: Eve is 28 degrees from 今上 天皇, 22 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 24 degrees from Dwight Heine, 29 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 25 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 24 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 24 degrees from Sono Osato, 36 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 25 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 27 degrees from Taika Waititi, 23 degrees from Penny Wong and 20 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
C > Clavering | D > de Benhale > Eve (Clavering) de Benhale
Categories: Quincy-226 Descendants | Clavering-13 Descendants | Magna Carta
NOTE: This profile has been the most challenging one yet, mainly due to the controversy surrounding her third "relationship" which may or may not have been a marriage. It may require some edits to make it all read better for whoever reviews the profile.
After reviewing every single source, I would lean that they were not married as the Wedgwood observations combined with the IPM not mentioning James as her late husband and instead mentioning Thomas are convincing to me. Whatever decision is made regarding that I'm fine with, married or no.
Darrell
I do not regard her IPM as evidence one way or the other as to whether she married James de Audley. It relates solely to specific property which she received in dower from her first marriage. In my view, it does not indicate that she was not married to James de Audley (just as the absence of a reference in the IPM to her marriage to Thomas de Ufford does not give evidence that she did not marry Thomas de Ufford).
edited by Michael Cayley
Edward was her third son with Sir Thomas de Ufford, who was slain at the Battle of Bannockburn, 24 June 1314.
She died in 1369.
I could not determine why Richardson set 1295 as the earliest birth year of the range. Although I changed her birth year to about 1300 (the center point of Richardson's range), it is likely she was born 1297 or earlier (keeping in mind that she died 1369).