| Daniel Bacon migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
Daniel Bacon, son of Michael Bacon and Alice (---) Bacon, was born about 1615, possibly in Winston, Suffolk, England.[1] The first known record of him is when he signed a compact on 18 December 1640 when the town of Woburn, Massachusetts Bay Colony, was organized. He would have been at least 21. His older brother, Michael, also signed.
Daniel married Mary Reed about 1640. Their son Daniel's estimated age based on court records is 1641, possibly 1640.[2] Where they married isn't obvious since there isn't any evidence of where either of them were about 1640 other than Daniel being in Charlestown, Massachusetts Bay Colony, when the Woburn document was signed very late in that year. When they came to New England is also unknown. Michael, Jr., and Daniel likely came together about 1640, given their joint signatures. This was also the first record of Michael, Jr., in New England.
Daniel took the Masachusetts Bay Colony freeman's oath on 26 May 1647.[3] No town of residence is given. He is on a 1655 tax list in Woburn.[4] The births of his children Thomas, John and Isaac are recorded there.[5]
Daniel, Mary and probably all of their children except Daniel, Jr., moved to Bridgewater, Plymouth Colony, by 1665, when Daniel, Sr., bought and was granted land there.[6] The claim that he was a surveyor of highways there in 1664 has no evidence to support it. It probably originated in an 1840 history of the town[7] and was often repeated since. This is the only reference to surveying highways in Bridgewater in 1664 in manuscript and published sources, suggesting it was a mistake. He was a constable there in 1666.[8]
The family moved to the Cambridge Village area of Cambridge, Massachusetts Bay Colony, (now Newton), probably in 1668, when Daniel bought several pieces of land there. [9] These included a homestead with a house bought from Gregory Cook on 15 June 1688. He was elected a surveyor of highways for Cambridge in 1669.[10] In 1672 he served as a constable there.[11]
In 1678 Daniel exchanged real property with his nephew Michael Bacon, Jr. For his Bridgwater land, Daniel was given property in Woburn.[12] This nephew found himself in court several times.
Daniel and Mary's children Rachel, Jacob and Lydia's births were recorded in Cambridge. This came about when the town clerk accounted for records for the family in 1674.[14] Thomas and John's births were already recorded in Woburn. Isaac is recorded in both towns, his father perhaps forgetting he was in the Woburn account. There is no evidence the family was in Cambridge between 1650-1645, and the 1655 rate list for Woburn mentions his taxable "person & estate."
Daniel died on 7 September 1691 in Cambridge Village, shortly before it was incorporated as "Newtown," and later Newton.[15] An inventory of his estate was taken on 29 September 1691, which was valued at 143 lbs., 17 shillings and 6 pence.[16] Daniel, Jr., and Michael Bacon bonded themselves as administrators on 23 November 1691.
As discussed above, all the children were evidently born in Woburn except maybe Daniel:[17]
The transcribed and annotated Newton vital records, [18] which were used for the published version, [19] attempt to include records from before the town was created. The beginning of the volume says they were taken from the parent town, Cambridge, and annual Middlesex and Suffolk County returns of vital records, but it's left to the researcher to figure out the origin for any particular record before 1678. The Bacon children were included apparently because Daniel and Mary lived there later in life, but the records are mishandled.
Daniel and Mary's children's records in the Newton transcription volume titled "Births, marriages, deaths 1626-1852:"[20]
Bacon
Isaac s. of Daniel & Mary 2 month 14.1650 [taken from the Cambridge record, not the Woburn return in the county records]
Rachel 4 [month] 8.1652
Jacob 4 [month] 2.1654
Lydia 1 [month] 6.1656
Hannah, Daniel 2.13.1645 [birth date for Thomas] John 6 [month] 7.1647 [incorrect]
The published Newton vital records used this information with the annotation "town copy with additions" and transferred the errors for Daniel and John, includes Hannah with no birth date and leaves out Thomas. Hannah has been given the arbitrary birth year of 1649 on the internet. There is no other evidence to support her existence, including the vital records that were sent by the town to the county clerk annually - which is the only credible source for the children born before 1650. The Cambridge town records[21] include Isaac, Rachel, Jacob and Lydia and they agree with the county court record with the exception of either missing or adding a 1 to Isaac's birth day, so with all these sources to go by, it's baffling that whoever compiled the Newton records, regardless of the mistake of including the Bacon children in the first place, managed so many errors.
Unsourced birth date: This profile previously stated that Daniel was born before 18 December 1619, but without source.
Featured German connections: Daniel is 15 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 20 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 22 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 18 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 19 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 21 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 24 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 16 degrees from Alexander Mack, 32 degrees from Carl Miele, 17 degrees from Nathan Rothschild, 20 degrees from Hermann Friedrich Albert von Ihering and 18 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
Categories: Puritan Great Migration Adult Child | Puritan Great Migration
Any corrections or additions to Bacon-846 will be appreciated Jim McAndrew-102
The location names suggested by WikiTree (for use in the data field) are just that, suggestions.
In my case, when I have used a different descriptor in the data field, another collaborator would often edit the profile to standardize the name. For a time, I edited the profile to revert the change, but changed my practice.
Now, most of the time I just select the best option in the data field--BUT, in the narrative, I'll use what I think is a better place name.
Admittedly, I don't usually type out "Province of ..." in the narrative, but I do include other details. When important for other reasons, I'll elaborate and provide references--such as when now Vermont wasn't Vermont, or when the area Bass River was separated from Salem and then become Beverly, or why the vital record referring to someone of "Cheshire" was referring to a person of "Chester (New Hampshire)."
For the record (or a record), see HistoryofMassachusetts.org for the entry (quoting),
Part of the reason I let the data fields standardize is a belief, right or wrong, that it may improve search results.
edited by GeneJ X
Proposing the same merge that was already rejected is, quite simply, pointless.