no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Daniel Bacon (abt. 1615 - 1691)

Daniel Bacon
Born about in Suffolk, Englandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1639 in Colchester, Essex, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 76 in Newton, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 4,337 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Daniel Bacon migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Biography

Daniel Bacon, son of Michael Bacon and Alice (---) Bacon, was born about 1615, possibly in Winston, Suffolk, England.[1] The first known record of him is when he signed a compact on 18 December 1640 when the town of Woburn, Massachusetts Bay Colony, was organized. He would have been at least 21. His older brother, Michael, also signed.

Daniel married Mary Reed about 1640. Their son Daniel's estimated age based on court records is 1641, possibly 1640.[2] Where they married isn't obvious since there isn't any evidence of where either of them were about 1640 other than Daniel being in Charlestown, Massachusetts Bay Colony, when the Woburn document was signed very late in that year. When they came to New England is also unknown. Michael, Jr., and Daniel likely came together about 1640, given their joint signatures. This was also the first record of Michael, Jr., in New England.

Daniel took the Masachusetts Bay Colony freeman's oath on 26 May 1647.[3] No town of residence is given. He is on a 1655 tax list in Woburn.[4] The births of his children Thomas, John and Isaac are recorded there.[5]

Daniel, Mary and probably all of their children except Daniel, Jr., moved to Bridgewater, Plymouth Colony, by 1665, when Daniel, Sr., bought and was granted land there.[6] The claim that he was a surveyor of highways there in 1664 has no evidence to support it. It probably originated in an 1840 history of the town[7] and was often repeated since. This is the only reference to surveying highways in Bridgewater in 1664 in manuscript and published sources, suggesting it was a mistake. He was a constable there in 1666.[8]

The family moved to the Cambridge Village area of Cambridge, Massachusetts Bay Colony, (now Newton), probably in 1668, when Daniel bought several pieces of land there. [9] These included a homestead with a house bought from Gregory Cook on 15 June 1688. He was elected a surveyor of highways for Cambridge in 1669.[10] In 1672 he served as a constable there.[11]

In 1678 Daniel exchanged real property with his nephew Michael Bacon, Jr. For his Bridgwater land, Daniel was given property in Woburn.[12] This nephew found himself in court several times.

2 Sep 1671 To Constables of Cambridge or Watertown. Order to arrest Michael Bacon who broke prison last night and probably will pass this night over ye Bridge at Watertown to his Uncle Daniel Bacons.[13]

Daniel and Mary's children Rachel, Jacob and Lydia's births were recorded in Cambridge. This came about when the town clerk accounted for records for the family in 1674.[14] Thomas and John's births were already recorded in Woburn. Isaac is recorded in both towns, his father perhaps forgetting he was in the Woburn account. There is no evidence the family was in Cambridge between 1650-1645, and the 1655 rate list for Woburn mentions his taxable "person & estate."

Daniel died on 7 September 1691 in Cambridge Village, shortly before it was incorporated as "Newtown," and later Newton.[15] An inventory of his estate was taken on 29 September 1691, which was valued at 143 lbs., 17 shillings and 6 pence.[16] Daniel, Jr., and Michael Bacon bonded themselves as administrators on 23 November 1691.

As discussed above, all the children were evidently born in Woburn except maybe Daniel:[17]

  1. Daniel Bacon b. abt. 1641
  2. Thomas b. 13 April 1645 ("13th 2nd mo 1645")
  3. John Bacon b. 8 September 1647 ("8th of 7th mo 1647")
  4. Hannah Bacon is erroneously given in a Newton vital records transcript (with no birthdate) as one of their children (see below)
  5. Isaac Bacon b. 4 or 14 April 1650 ("4th of 2nd mo 1650," Middlesex court record of Woburn return; "April 14, 1650," Cambridge town record as published)
  6. Rachel (Bacon) Pierce b. 8 June 1652
  7. Jacob Bacon b. 2 June 1654
  8. Lydia (Bacon) Pierce b. 6 March 1655/56

The transcribed and annotated Newton vital records, [18] which were used for the published version, [19] attempt to include records from before the town was created. The beginning of the volume says they were taken from the parent town, Cambridge, and annual Middlesex and Suffolk County returns of vital records, but it's left to the researcher to figure out the origin for any particular record before 1678. The Bacon children were included apparently because Daniel and Mary lived there later in life, but the records are mishandled.

Daniel and Mary's children's records in the Newton transcription volume titled "Births, marriages, deaths 1626-1852:"[20]

Bacon

Isaac s. of Daniel & Mary 2 month 14.1650 [taken from the Cambridge record, not the Woburn return in the county records]

Rachel 4 [month] 8.1652

Jacob 4 [month] 2.1654

Lydia 1 [month] 6.1656

Hannah, Daniel 2.13.1645 [birth date for Thomas] John 6 [month] 7.1647 [incorrect]

The published Newton vital records used this information with the annotation "town copy with additions" and transferred the errors for Daniel and John, includes Hannah with no birth date and leaves out Thomas. Hannah has been given the arbitrary birth year of 1649 on the internet. There is no other evidence to support her existence, including the vital records that were sent by the town to the county clerk annually - which is the only credible source for the children born before 1650. The Cambridge town records[21] include Isaac, Rachel, Jacob and Lydia and they agree with the county court record with the exception of either missing or adding a 1 to Isaac's birth day, so with all these sources to go by, it's baffling that whoever compiled the Newton records, regardless of the mistake of including the Bacon children in the first place, managed so many errors.

Research Notes

Unsourced birth date: This profile previously stated that Daniel was born before 18 December 1619, but without source.

Sources

  1. Baldwin, Thomas Williams, "Bacon Genealogy: Michael Bacon of Dedham, 1640 and his Descendants" (Cambridge, MA: 1915), 111-114.
  2. citation review at Doug Sinclair's Archives (http://dougsinclairsarchives.com/bacon/danielbacon2.htm): "Three of the court records say "about," so it isn't obvious who gave his age. The other age is specificly given. If any of them are to be believed, only the latter puts his birth possibly well into 1642 (Oct 1641-Oct 1642). The other three combined encompass a date span between Feb 1640 and Jan 1642, so 1641 is the most plausible circa date. Sources: 4 Feb 1678/79, about 38, Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, Massachusetts [hereafter ECQC], vol. 7 (Salem, MA: Essex Institute, 1919), 246; 30 Jan 1671/72, about 30, "Colonial [Middlesex] county court papers, 1648-1798," familysearch.org database online (Salt Lake City, UT: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1974), Court papers - Folios 27-60 1647-1672, folio 59, group 1, image 1237 of film 7902664; 7 June 1681, about 40 and wife about 36, ECQC, vol 8 (1921), 109; 29 Oct 1716, age 75 (see note 4)."
  3. Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, vol. 1 (Boston:1853), 294.
  4. "Colonial [Middlesex] county court papers, 1648-1798," "Court papers - Folios 27-60 1647-1672," folio 59, group 1, image 1255 of film 7902664.
  5. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, Woburn, Births, marriages, deaths 1641-1843, images 9 & 10 of film 007011120.
  6. Middlesex Co., MA, deed records, 4:180; Records of John Carey, etc. (Brockton, MA: 1889), 8.
  7. Mitchell, Nahum, History of Bridgewater, Massachusetts (Boston, MA: 1840, reprinted Bridgewater, MA: 1897), 106.
  8. Records of the Colony of New Plymouth, etc. (also known as Plymouth Court Records), ed. Nathaniel Shurtleff, vol. 4 (Boston, MA: 1855), 123.
  9. Middlesex Co., MA, deed records, 3:375, 4:95.
  10. The records of the Town of Cambridge (formerly Newtowne), Massachusetts, 1630-1703 (Cambridge, MA:1901), 181.
  11. Ibid, 205.
  12. Middlesex Co., MA, deed records, 9:467.
  13. Middlesex Co., MA, court record abstract: Abstracts of Court Files on AmericanAncestors$, 1649–1675. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2003), (Unpublished abstracts by Thomas Bellows Wyman, "Abstract of Middlesex court files from 1649," n.d.)
  14. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, image 143.
  15. Vital Records of Newton, Massachusetts: To the Year 1850 (Boston: 1905), 421.
  16. Middlesex Co., MA, probate records, 7:346, transcription of the original. The transcription, while not verbatim, is accurate (see Middlesex Co., MA, probate case file 632).
  17. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, Woburn, Births, marriages, deaths 1641-1843, images 9 & 10 of film 007011120; Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, image 143.
  18. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, Births, marriages, deaths 1626-1852, image 16 of film 007009513.
  19. Vital Records of Newton, Massachusetts: To the Year 1850 (Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1905), 14-15.
  20. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," familysearch.org database online (Provo, UT: 2020), Middlesex, Newton, Births, marriages, deaths 1626-1852, image 12.
  21. Vital Records of Cambridge, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850 vol. 1 (Boston, MA: 1914), 31-32.




Is Daniel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Daniel's DNA have taken a DNA test. Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
There are many mistakes in this biography. Aspects of his birth, marriage and immigration are unsupportable. These and other problems mostly come from relying very heavily on secondary sources and what other people have said in their personal databases uploaded to familsearch.org. I've reviewed these sources, and more importantly, available primary sources, and I can make improvements unless someone objects.
posted by Doug Sinclair
Thank you Doug. Yes, please feel free to proceed.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Thank you, Doug,

Any corrections or additions to Bacon-846 will be appreciated Jim McAndrew-102

posted by Jim McAndrew Jr
Doug, thanks for your edits. As part of the PGM activity feed check I changed the death location to "Newton, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony" only because WikiTree standards say not to include alternate name locations in the data fields. What you put was accurate (Newtown, later Newton) but explanatory text about the history of the location was already in the bio, so the change I made was just to avoid data doctor flags and to adhere better to standards.
posted by Brad Stauf
Hi Brad, I asked about why Prov. of MA Bay wasn't an option at G2G and several people said the drop downs were from familysearch and were only suggestions. Frustrating, since wikitree, from what you're saying I assume, will insist on calling everything in what is now Massachusetts "MA Bay Colony" between 1691 and 1776, which is a very big mistake.
posted by Doug Sinclair
Hi Doug,

The location names suggested by WikiTree (for use in the data field) are just that, suggestions.

In my case, when I have used a different descriptor in the data field, another collaborator would often edit the profile to standardize the name. For a time, I edited the profile to revert the change, but changed my practice.

Now, most of the time I just select the best option in the data field--BUT, in the narrative, I'll use what I think is a better place name.

Admittedly, I don't usually type out "Province of ..." in the narrative, but I do include other details. When important for other reasons, I'll elaborate and provide references--such as when now Vermont wasn't Vermont, or when the area Bass River was separated from Salem and then become Beverly, or why the vital record referring to someone of "Cheshire" was referring to a person of "Chester (New Hampshire)."

For the record (or a record), see HistoryofMassachusetts.org for the entry (quoting),

The Province of Massachusetts Bay was a royal colony in Massachusetts in the 17th and 18th century.
The province was originally a charter colony called the Massachusetts Bay Colony until 1684, when its charter was revoked due to repeated violations of its terms, and it was converted into a royal colony in 1691.
British control of all 13 colonies in North America, including the Province of Massachusetts Bay, was eventually overthrown during the American Revolution in the late 18th century.
The Province of Massachusetts Bay then became the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1780.

Part of the reason I let the data fields standardize is a belief, right or wrong, that it may improve search results.

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
Doug, I'm far from an expert on exactly when the different parts of Massachusetts were colonies, provinces, when Plymouth Colony was independent and when it was absorbed into Massachusetts etc. I generally go with the dropdowns and try to match the year with the description, so "Duxbury" for example will give different results depending on the year of the event. New Towne, Cambridge, Newton are good examples of problems with these limited data fields. Are those date drop downs really accurate? I don't know, I've seen some interesting discussion on "who was the naming authority at the time" or "from what documents do you take the name when they are contradictory" etc on G2G. Obviously it's a whole world unto itself and like Gene said, mostly we just try to clarify through text in the bio.
posted by Brad Stauf
I didn't understand the reasons behind it, but now I do. I don't know of any waffling when it comes to the charters. One (Prov of MA Bay) superceded the others (MA Bay Colony, Plymouth Colony, etc.) For instance, I don't recall ever seeing a deed referring to someone living in MBC or PC after the charters were discontinued. It looks like this was an oversight at familysearch. It is what it is!
posted by Doug Sinclair
Bacon-6583 and Bacon-846 do not represent the same person because: everything about these two is different. Perhaps the wrong ID?
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Beacon-41 and Bacon-846 do not represent the same person because: Daniel Bacon is NOT the father of John who married Susanna Draper.
posted by Patrick Griffith
@ David Hughey: Daniel Bacon is NOT the father of John Beacon who married Susanna Draper, which is the John who died 7 Apr 1678 in Charlestown. See my comment on Bacon-774.

Proposing the same merge that was already rejected is, quite simply, pointless.

posted by Patrick Griffith
Beacon-41 and Bacon-846 appear to represent the same person because: Same child, same death date and place, similar bio facts
posted by David Hughey Ph.D.
Beacon-41 and Bacon-846 do not represent the same person because: This is an attempted merge of Daniel Bacon with John Bacon, not remotely the same person. For John Bacon/Beacon see origins unknown TAG: 82: 2007: p. 92
posted by Chris Hoyt
Beacon-41 and Bacon-846 appear to represent the same person because: same child, ather's name is Bacpm/ Please double wife's name...
posted by David Hughey Ph.D.
Bacon-2488 and Bacon-846 appear to represent the same person because: These Daniel Bacon entries have the same spouse and appear to be one individual
posted by Jim McAndrew Jr

Featured German connections: Daniel is 15 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 20 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 22 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 18 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 19 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 21 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 24 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 16 degrees from Alexander Mack, 32 degrees from Carl Miele, 17 degrees from Nathan Rothschild, 20 degrees from Hermann Friedrich Albert von Ihering and 18 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

B  >  Bacon  >  Daniel Bacon

Categories: Puritan Great Migration Adult Child | Puritan Great Migration