Logie: entry for 13th May 1735 Saturday reads: the which day upon production of a testimonial from Kincardine, Robert Buchanan in the said parish, and Janet Monteith in this parish, enrolled their names here to be proclaimed in order to marriage, and William Bryce in Coldhome became cautioner for their pawnes, which is ten shillings.[2]
Kincardine: entry for 7 Jun 1735 reads: Robt Buchannan parochner & Janet Monteath in Logie - marryed 17 July afterwards[3]
↑Baptism: 7 March 1708, Church of Scotland Parish Births and Baptisms (1553-1855), 07/03/1708, 364, 10/17, Kincardine. Robert, son to Robert Buchannan and Helin Musthol. Witnesses John Ramsay and David Thomson.
↑ Proclamation 13 May 1735 Robert BUCHANAN (Kincardine) & Janet MONTEITH, from Logie Parish Register, image available ScotlandsPeople 374 /20 252
↑Marriage: 17 Jul 1735 Robt BUCHANNAN & Janet MONTEATH (Logie), from Kincardine, PER parish register, image available ScotlandsPeople 364/ 10 194
↑ 4.04.1 Church of Scotland: Old Parish Registers - Births and Baptisms
National Records of Scotland, Parish Number: 364; Ref: 10/47 ScotlandsPeople (accessed 29 July 2023) Rot & Alexr Buchannan baptised 28 Apr 1738, twins of Rot Buchannan & Janet Monteath, in Kincardine, Perthshire, Scotland. Wit.: Rot Buchannan & David Douny.
↑ 'Church of Scotland: Old Parish Registers - Births and Baptisms.
National Records of Scotland, Parish Number: 364; Ref: 10/51 ScotlandsPeople (accessed 29 July 2023) Helin Buchannan baptised 15 Aug 1742, daur of Rot Buchannan & Janet Monteath, in Kincardine, Perthshire, Scotland. Wit.: Thos: ?Glasses? & David Douny
Is Robert your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Robert by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Robert:
Buchanan-10488 and Buchanan-4941 appear to represent the same person because: These are one and the same husband / wife / children.
Shifting a family from an existing profile (Buchanan-4941) to an identical newly created one (Buchanan-10488) then renaming the original person from Robert to John and giving him a different birth makes nonsense of assorted links, both internal and external to WikiTree.
Shifting a family from an existing profile (Buchanan-4941) to an identical newly created one (Buchanan-10488) then renaming the original person from Robert to John and giving him a different birth makes nonsense of assorted links, both internal and external to WikiTree.